Some Rational, Reasonable, Truthfully Logical, Cognitive Thought Regarding CTE

[French Roots]

Some rational, reasonable, truthfully logical, cognitive thought regarding CTE.

Mentally take that "ball set" with those lines between the defined points of CTE & ETB & then move that "ball set" anywhere else on the table.
Do the points on the balls & the lines between them change because of where that "ball set" is on the table. The answer is an emphatic NO!

Move that "ball set" 1/2 to 1 diamond forward. Do the points on the balls & the lines between them change because of that different location on the table? The answer is an empathic NO!

Move that "ball set" 1/2 to 1 diamond closer than its original location. Do the points on the balls & the lines between them change because of that different location on the table?
The answer is an empathic NO!

So, given that the points on the balls & the lines on the balls do NOT change regardless of where they are on the table, then how can a DIFFERENT outcome angle be achieved by looking at the Same thing & doing the SAME thing?
The emphatic answer is that a DIFFERENT outcome angle can NOT be achieved by looking at the SAME thing & doing the SAME thing.

Yet that is what Mr. Shuffett & the vocal CTEers here on AZB say can be done.

To say such is irrational, unreasonable, & illogical... & untruthful.

Now... I am not saying that they do not "believe" what they say. I am just saying that what they "believe" & say is inaccurate.

 

[Patrick Johnson]

...how can a DIFFERENT outcome angle be achieved by looking at the Same thing & doing the SAME thing?

You're overlooking the well known fact that CTE is from another dimension and was never supposed to be.

pj
chgo

 

[The_JV]

[insert]poop.gif[/insert]

Since you saw it already I'll show your thread more respect then you showed mine.

 

[French Roots]

View attachment 597486

So... You are not what I first thought you were. You now seem to be what I later suspected.

 

[cookie man]

You're overlooking the well known fact that CTE is from another dimension and was never supposed to be.

pj
chgo

Exactly. We agree again

 

[French Roots]

You're overlooking the well known fact that CTE is from another dimension and was never supposed to be.

pj
chgo

We both know that you are being sarcastic. However, some newbie may not realize that. I will amend your post to make it more clear for such a newbie. Perhaps you should do the same to your original post.

You're overlooking the well known SUPPOSED fact that CTE is from another dimension and was never supposed to be.

pj
chgo

 

[The_JV]

So... You are not what I first thought you were. You now seem to be what I later suspected.

and you my friend are exactly what I thought you were.

 

[Patrick Johnson]

We both know that you are being sarcastic.

So does everybody else with more than one brain cell.

pj
chgo

 

[French Roots]

and you my friend are exactly what I thought you were.

I doubt that we are or will wind up "friends".

 

[French Roots]

So does everybody else with more than one brain cell.

pj
chgo

However, a newbie can get disoriented & just read & take things on face value. I would rather that not happen

 

[cookie man]

We both know that you are being sarcastic. However, some newbie may not realize that. I will amend your post to make it more clear for such a newbie. Perhaps you should do the same to your original post.

Yea PJ you better listen to the bully. His way or the highway. Didn't we used to say that about someone a few years ago.

 

[The_JV]

However, a newbie can get disoriented & just read & take things on face value. I would rather that not happen

Dude... I cannot think of a better description of you

 

[Boxcar]

Dude... I cannot think of a better description of you

JV,

Did you buy the book? Did you read the entire book? If the answer to those questions is "yes," would you be kind enough to post a comprehensive and objective review for the benefit of the members here at AZB?

 

[BC21]

Imagine this, and I'm not sure if this is how it works....

Knowing those two lines in the picture will use the same references on both balls when you move them up 1/2 a diamond, what prevents a player from looking at these references from a slightly different visual perspective, like favoring the left eye instead of their normal vision center?

From this different perspective the player's body is more to the right. Then when using their vision center to focus on ccb from that particular perspective, the player would be cutting the ob thinner than the initial setup. This means different shot angles can be obtained using the same references for each shot, but changing how you look at those references.

Imma grab another chair for JV and pop some more popcorn! Lol

 

[French Roots]

Dude... I cannot think of a better description of you

I am no newbie. I have been reading AZB forums for may years & playing for much longer.... DUDE!

 

[French Roots]

[insert]poop.gif[/insert]

Since you saw it already I'll show your thread more respect then you showed mine.

Notice that I did not whine & complain. I know what happens to threads, especially when CTEers are involved.

 

[French Roots]

Imagine this, and I'm not sure if this is how it works....

Knowing those two lines in the picture will use the same references on both balls when you move them up 1/2 a diamond, what prevents a player from looking at these references from a slightly different visual perspective, like favoring the left eye instead of their normal vision center?

From this different perspective the player's body is more to the right. Then when using their vision center to focus on ccb from that particular perspective, the player would be cutting the ob thinner than the initial setup. This means different shot angles can be obtained using the same references for each shot, but changing how you look at those references.

Imma grab another chair for JV and pop some more popcorn! Lol

Nothing prevents a player from doing something "different". Where in DVD1 or DVD2 or the many YouTube Videos did it say to do such? The instructions were to move until the player saw the visual... the same visual. It was supposed to look the same but BE "different" because of the supposed Phenomena & the supposed Mathematical Connection to the 2:1 table.

What I said in post #1 should be proof for any rational, reasonable, truthfully logical individual that those assertions are false.

How about closing one eye? What is there that "objectively dictates" how much off to one side should a player move their "PERSPECTIVE" for each of the many different angle shots?

 

[The_JV]

Notice that I did not whine & complain. I know what happens to threads, especially when CTEers are involved.

I noticed your and quickly showed your effort to drum up the tired old arguments more respect then you did for my thread that was scripted to entice conversation rather than take shots at the CTE crowd.

..but since you don't have a problem with it:

 

[The_JV]

JV,

Did you buy the book? Did you read the entire book? If the answer to those questions is "yes," would you be kind enough to post a comprehensive and objective review for the benefit of the members here at AZB?

No I have not.... and I will not be. I don't have enough need for an aiming system to warrant the $100 asking price.

My comments about CTE techinques were driven by viewing Stan's videos on Youtube.

 

[French Roots]

I noticed your and quickly showed your effort to drum up the tired old arguments more respect then you did for my thread that was scripted to entice conversation rather than take shots at the CTE crowd.

..but since you don't have a problem with it:
View attachment 597490

Hey, that is more of a reflection on you than it is me. I did not say that I do not have a problem with it or liked it. I said that I did not whine or complain to you about it like you did regarding my civil words.