dogginda9 said:I've seen all kinds of crazy games made, but the toughest spot I ever gave out was the old "playing with a broom handle" spot. I even put a toilet plunger head on the end instead of the usual bristles. I had a pretty average player give me 20 balls to 50 in straight pool and then he gave me the wild 8 playing 9 ball. He was just totally intimidated and found a way to lose.
The 4 out call and the breaks is the biggest normal spot I've ever outrun before. I won $1200 or so. Funny part is we started out playing $5 a game 8 ball and he just kept escalating things until we got to the 4 out and the breaks.
The biggest spot I ever got was the 7 and breaks from a champion. That didn't go well for me. Also, 2 hit and the pick 9-8 playing one pocket from a very strong player. That went well. The most fun game I ever got was from Marco Marquez. We had been playing with me getting the breaks and I think the last 2. Back and forth we go. He was a little ahead I think and I call it a day. He talks me into playing a new way. We play 9 ball, winner breaks, and he gets to break and take 1 shot per rack right handed. All other shots are left handed!! He confirmed what I had heard before. His game only drops a relatively small amount. Watching him spin the cue ball off handed like that was pretty impressive. These are just a few of the weird games I've seen over the years.
The broom handle/plunger game is for dead go offs that can't ever run out. Even though you ARE the Worst_7_ever, you do not qualify for such a game.:thumbup:Worst_7_ever said:That reminds me Jeff...I saw Nevel play bookie Bob with the mop handle before back at 63rd street soon after Bob bought the place. There were some other stipulations invloved as well, but it was wild watching him stroke the ball with the mop handle. He was allowed to "rough up" the handle point, and use chalk on it. I am fairly sure Bob one that one.
I would give you the same spot if your willing to play with the broom handle![]()
Gerry said:One of the biggest spots I have ever seen was "80 no count" straight pool. It means the guy giving the spot (who also was my teacher) has to run 80 or more balls for his score to count!...yup, run 79 and miss and you are at ZERO.
He pounded the guy senseless running 100's all day! I was working the counter watching this every couple of weeks. Can you imagine losing 80 no count going to 100.....whats next?![]()
Bobby said:I've seen two players play 100 no count, it took about 2 hours before one ran a 100...there was a 71 ball run in there as well as a 63. this was on a loose pocketed table but still impressive.
Johnny Ervolino used to tell me how when he was just a kid he used to watch the great James Evans and Johnny "Irish" Lineen play 75 no count on a 5 x 10 table with very tight pockets. Now that's insane!
sjm said:Abe Rosen, grand old man of pool, and a mentor to Johnny Ervolino, used to ask for 99 on the wire in a straight pool race to 100 as well as a provision that there would be no deductions for his scratches.
The catch was that Abe shot every shot with the sharp end of a pencil. Abe usually won. I believe Abe would have turned 100 this year if he'd lived. Even a shot like the one ball below was unmakeable because Abe couldn't hit the cue ball more than about 18-24 inches.
dogginda9 said:p.s. I kid. You're not the Worst-7-ever...................
Haven't personally "witnessed" this one, but here's a crazy spot: the "hand span" spot -- where you get ball in hand anywhere within a hand span's distance of the cue ball's last position on the table:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=eX1jmGbpnPU
This particular spot was given by Scott Frost in a One Pocket match up.
Pretty inventive spot!
-Sean