Stan Shuffet Center to Edge

[Mr. Wilson]

<snip> The problem is that Stan is not a scientist or engineer trained in designing experiments, which is what those particular videos really are, so very often the video actually proves the opposite of what he is trying to demonstrate. .

Dan, until you are a scientist with empirical evidence to show in specific measure that his claims are in fact wrong, then you have nothing but an opinion.

You have been gracious enough to share your opinion many, many...many times.

Now that your opinion is so well known, there simply isn't a need for you to participate in any further conversation regrading CTE on any level or portion of this forum again.

Any further participation will be considered antagonistic.

 

[BeiberLvr]

Dan, until you are a scientist with empirical evidence to show in specific measure that his claims are in fact wrong, then you have nothing but an opinion.

You have been gracious enough to share your opinion many, many...many times.

Now that your opinion is so well known, there simply isn't a need for you to participate in any further conversation regrading CTE on any level or portion of this forum again.

Any further participation will be considered antagonistic.

I don't think you need to be a scientist to know the claims aren't 100% true.

 

[Mr. Wilson]

I don't think you need to be a scientist to know the claims aren't 100% true.

That is an opinion.

 

[Patrick Johnson]

I don't think you need to be a scientist to know the claims aren't 100% true.

You don't even need to be particularly bright.

And why aren't those who make and defend the unscientific claims being held to any standard of "opinion without empirical evidence"? Not to mention that their responses are much more inflammatory than anything posted by Dan.

pj
chgo

 

[SpiderWebComm]

You don't even need to be particularly bright.

And why aren't those who make and defend the unscientific claims being held to any standard of "opinion without empirical evidence"?

Who or what is the "source" of this empirical evidence". YOU? The evidence comes from those who USE the system because they KNOW the system as taught which includes amateurs and PRO PLAYERS alike. You have no clue and never did.

pj
chgo

Don't forget to include YOUR inflammatory responses for the LAST 20 YEARS.

You've gotten a multiple year BAN for them in the past. You're also the ACE #1 INITIATOR of all this crap starting back 20 years ago on RSB. Your biggest fear is being knocked from the top of the totem pole as the initiator and primary dissenter of CTE starting back 20 years ago. Your "legacy" will go down the tubes.

What a friggin' LEGACY to be proud of!!

 

[SpiderWebComm]

I don't think you need to be a scientist to know the claims aren't 100% true.

Correct. All you need to be is a non-user who never learned it as taught. Then you can make claims they are untrue and false.

Can you even come close to explaining the steps as to what you should see and how to set up?

If so, please do. We users and Stan will critique your knowledge that you think gives you the right to claim they don't work and are untrue. It should take all of about 20 seconds of your time and ours to figure it out.