My brother had a pool room for a couple of years; I was a counterman there during that time. In that time, I only met a handful of people that used CTE including myself. The people that were using it were very good pool players, two or three I would consider pro caliber. From my experience,
that would put the percentage of users at just a fraction of a percentage point.
I've tried to explain/teach the system to a few people, but was unsuccessful in getting anyone to adopt it, except for one person who was a total beginner. Why was I able to teach that person? I think that since she didn't have any other experience that I had to train over, there was no mental conflicts with how the aiming process/sight picture should be. During the time she came to the poolroom, I went over other concepts of aiming: ghostball, contact point, fractional. After using other aiming methods, she felt she was more comfortable with CTE. Her skill level? She plays APA and is a three, which isn't too bad considering that's all the pool she plays. I did see her occasionally and asked if she was still using CTE; she said she was. Is she still using it? Don't know, room closed in August; haven't seen her since.
Why other people couldn't/wouldn't grasp/use CTE; I think it's because people consciously/subconsciously compare what they already know about aiming. Since it's quite a bit different from other methods of aiming, they become confused/frustrated and decide to stop and go with what has been successful. Myself, I played pool for over twenty years, before I started using it. I wasn't satisfied with my level of play and was looking for a way to advance some. I came upon CTE when I joined AZB in '04 and followed the discussions on it for a few years, until I met one of the people that was involved. He gave me a general overview. I took that and any other information I could come across and applied it to my game. Was I totally successful with it from the beginning? No, since the system information I had was very basic, it took me quite a bit of time, to figure out how to successfully utilize it. One thing I did that most people didn't/won't, I stuck with it. Did I get frustrated? Sure, but I kept looking for answers to improve. A couple of things that helped were understanding the perceptions in 90/90 and Pro-One. No matter what system you use, if you don't put the time in practicing at the table and HAMB, all this discussion is mute:groucho:
It really is a shame that so few people use CTE, as a system it works rather well.
You do realize that without the name of the pool hall and the names of the five supposed CTE players there, that constitutes a pretty weak claim, don't you? To take it a step further, would you like to share the predictive algorithm you used to make the leap from five guys in Arkansas to 1,000 CTE users? Lastly, BS is Stan's son. Not all endorsements are created equal, with one coming from a son ranking about as low as possible.
Granting you five guys in AR, and BS, and throwing in the half dozen cult members here, and even Stan himself, you're still 988 players short.
Lou Figueroa
just sayin'