statement to larry

blud

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
STATEMENT TO LARRY,

I, just received a PM from FL. [tired to send him a PM, he will not except them] strange, one way street....real strange.

larry, It's been real nice without you hammering on me and my so called dealers you refer to, and others here on AZ..

Nice week here at AZ, we have had, not a single fuss or fight.

You have been reading this forum. You can see how nice it is without your comments to one and all.

If you are allowed to come back, come on, just treat us with the respect were due,and keep your comments, rumors, name callings and such to yourself. By doing this, you will be treated with "RESPECT".

A lot can be learned from you, if you just keep it clean, Larry.

Post good stuff, not your usual crap. Just post. There's no need to post over and over again as you do. Then come with your bragging how great you are with every post, over and again. That's BS. We know how you are....

larry, I owe you no apology for what i have said in the past. You did sir, spread a rumor about me that is not true. I would think as an adult, you would not carry a message as you put it. Nothing but rumors....
I defened myself. I will continue to do so....

You think that your opinion is the only one that counts. Your wrong....

You bring to wrost out of me and many others. You should be proud for that..

That being said, larry, I have abd will continue to leave you alone. you should follow suit, [based on your e-mail to me].LEAVE ME ALONE, SIR..........

no wars guys...please....it's over...........and said.....
blud
 
And the reason for your post?

Such a nice week, as you say, and you couldn't leave it alone?

I guess the truth is you really do miss FL.

Or is it maybe even bad publicity about your cue business by FL is better than no publicity.

Actually, it has been a pretty nice week. No FL. No Blud. No bickering. No fighting.

Jake
 
jjinfla said:
And the reason for your post?

Such a nice week, as you say, and you couldn't leave it alone?

I guess the truth is you really do miss FL.

Or is it maybe even bad publicity about your cue business by FL is better than no publicity.

Actually, it has been a pretty nice week. No FL. No Blud. No bickering. No fight

Yes, it's been real nice. I just answered him, pal. I never left. I wasn't banned, he was.
blud
 
blud said:
jjinfla said:
And the reason for your post?

Such a nice week, as you say, and you couldn't leave it alone?

I guess the truth is you really do miss FL.

Or is it maybe even bad publicity about your cue business by FL is better than no publicity.
blud

I guess my question is why do fl threads continue to pop up. I did make that public apology after he had read it the first post which I realized was kind of mean spirited, but other than that, I do wonder why this stuff keeps coming up.

Why not just see how things are when he returns and go from there?

Laura
 
reply

Bluewolf said:
I guess my question is why do fl threads continue to pop up. I did make that public apology after he had read it the first post which I realized was kind of mean spirited, but other than that, I do wonder why this stuff keeps coming up.

Why not just see how things are when he returns and go from there?

Laura

Hi Laura, the only reason i replied was he will not take PM. He sent me two. I only answered him in public. Needed to be said. now we can move on.OK?
blud
 
stop

catscradle said:
Boredom????


For those who do not like me answering larry, it's simple. stop writting.BTW,[ it was to larry]..
I did ask nice not to fuss or fight.
thanks for your consideration
blud
 
blud said:
For those who do not like me answering larry, it's simple. stop writting.BTW,[ it was to larry]..
I did ask nice not to fuss or fight.
thanks for your consideration
blud
Larry has posted his email address about a thousand times here and I'm sure you can reach him through his website. www.fastlarrypool.com

I think it would have been more appropriate for you to keep it private.

I don't want to get in the middle of your fight, but with Larry not here to stand up for himself, it is hardly proper for you to reply to his PM publically.
 
Colin Colenso said:
Larry has posted his email address about a thousand times here and I'm sure you can reach him through his website. www.fastlarrypool.com

I think it would have been more appropriate for you to keep it private.

I don't want to get in the middle of your fight, but with Larry not here to stand up for himself, it is hardly proper for you to reply to his PM publically.

Tap tap tap.
 
larry

recoveryjones said:
Tap tap tap.
Hey, I sent the message to larry with his automatic returned e-mail, on the pm. I did not have his other e-mail address.

What was said hurt no one. I really don't care what anyone thinks. it's my reputatrion on the line here . If you guys don't like it "ignore it" it's that easy.

I did what I had to do. What was said needed to be said in public. Most here feel the same way as what I have written. You guys have no guts to stick up for what's right. so don't come here and tell me what you think is correct.
I don't need a manager.

You don't have to agree with me, what is done is done. duh

None of you have the right to judge me when it comes to my reputation, none of you.....It's me defending my reputation.

It's over.........

Now, will you guys have enough respect to just drop it as I ask, in my responce to larry.[ remember, no wars, fussing or fighting ]....

blud
 
blud said:
Hey, I sent the message to larry with his automatic returned e-mail, on the pm. I did not have his other e-mail address.

What was said hurt no one. I really don't care what anyone thinks. it's my reputatrion on the line here . If you guys don't like it "ignore it" it's that easy.

I did what I had to do. What was said needed to be said in public. Most here feel the same way as what I have written. You guys have no guts to stick up for what's right. so don't come here and tell me what you think is correct.
I don't need a manager.

You don't have to agree with me, what is done is done. duh

None of you have the right to judge me when it comes to my reputation, none of you.....It's me defending my reputation.

It's over.........

Now, will you guys have enough respect to just drop it as I ask, in my responce to larry.[ remember, no wars, fussing or fighting ]....

blud



You wrote: I don't need a manager.
Reread what you wrote, yes, you need a manager. :D
 
blud said:
Hey, I sent the message to larry with his automatic returned e-mail, on the pm. I did not have his other e-mail address.

What was said hurt no one. I really don't care what anyone thinks. it's my reputatrion on the line here . If you guys don't like it "ignore it" it's that easy.

I did what I had to do. What was said needed to be said in public. Most here feel the same way as what I have written. You guys have no guts to stick up for what's right. so don't come here and tell me what you think is correct.
I don't need a manager.

You don't have to agree with me, what is done is done. duh

None of you have the right to judge me when it comes to my reputation, none of you.....It's me defending my reputation.

It's over.........

Now, will you guys have enough respect to just drop it as I ask, in my responce to larry.[ remember, no wars, fussing or fighting ]....

blud

Hi Blud,Since Larry's automated return email on the pm doesn't currently work (because of the fact he's banned), he didn't get your intended private message to him to be able to respond.

Having said that, I've got nothing against you and nothing against Larry. I'm on no-ones side regarding your indifferences.Even thought the masses may be on your side against Larry, I'm not intimidated by the masses and don't agree with the wolf pack, let's gang up on Larry philosiphy. I'm not a people pleaser.

If you were banned and Larry took the opportunity to say something about you without you being able to defend yourself, I would have sent a "tap tap tap" response to him as well.You support your right to defend yourself by your recent post(without Larry being able to defend) and I disagree with it. No problem as it's different strokes for different folks.I respect your desicion for you to decide what you think is right hopefully you'll respect my right to respectfully disagree.

In summary we've all got our good and bad sides and Larry got villified for his.There are many others who aren't innocent in this quarrel and as you well know it takes two to tangle.RJ
 
recoveryjones said:
Hi Blud,Since Larry's automated return email on the pm doesn't currently work (because of the fact he's banned), he didn't get your intended private message to him to be able to respond.

Having said that, I've got nothing against you and nothing against Larry. I'm on no-ones side regarding your indifferences.Even thought the masses may be on your side against Larry, I'm not intimidated by the masses and don't agree with the wolf pack, let's gang up on Larry philosiphy. I'm not a people pleaser.

If you were banned and Larry took the opportunity to say something about you without you being able to defend yourself, I would have sent a "tap tap tap" response to him as well.You support your right to defend yourself by your recent post(without Larry being able to defend) and I disagree with it. No problem as it's different strokes for different folks.I respect your desicion for you to decide what you think is right hopefully you'll respect my right to respectfully disagree.

In summary we've all got our good and bad sides and Larry got villified for his.There are many others who aren't innocent in this quarrel and as you well know it takes two to tangle.RJ

I got a news flash for you. FL is still reading this board. He wrote me a pm just the other day. Evidently, he read one of my posts about him and wanted to reply. He did it through one of his aliases.
 
Rickw said:
I got a news flash for you. FL is still reading this board. He wrote me a pm just the other day. Evidently, he read one of my posts about him and wanted to reply. He did it through one of his aliases.

Hi Rick, Larry may or may not have aliases, however, Blud sent his private message (the one in question) to his FAST LARRY name and not to one of his supposed alias names so therefore he wouldn't have got that particuliar meassage because his Fast Larry identity has been banned. Take care, RJ
 
This is the most worthless drivel I've read in a while.

I find people don't want to be told what to do or what to post. I find people don't generally want unsolicited advice. Do you?
 
Back
Top