Stats -- Efren Reyes vs. Earl Strickland "Color of Money" 9-Ball Race to 120, November 1996

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some results from the Efren Reyes vs. Earl Strickland "Color of Money" 9-ball match played at Ridgway's Bar & Restaurant in Hong Kong in November, 1996. Ostensibly, the match was for $100,000, winner take all. Reyes won the match 120 - 117 after coming back from a 17-game deficit at 87 - 104.

The primary sponsor of the match was the room owner, Bob Moore. The commentators were Mark Wilson from the USA and Edgar Picson from the Philippines. The primary referee was Neil Martin. At that time, Reyes was age 42 and Strickland was age 35. DVDs of the full match are available from Accu-Stats.

This match was a race to 120 game wins played over 3 days. Here are the scores at the end of each day, with Reyes' score first:
Day 1 -- 32 - 35​
Day 2 -- 31 - 35 (2-day total 63 - 70)​
Day 3 -- 57 - 47​
Total -- 120 - 117​

Conditions -- The conditions for this event included:
- 9-foot Brunswick Gold Crown table with generous pockets (I didn't hear any mention of pocket sizes);​
- new blue cloth (I didn't hear any mention of the brand);​
- Brunswick Centennial balls with a red circle cue ball;​
- wooden triangle rack;​
- referee racked with the 1-ball on the foot spot, the 2-ball at the back, and the 3- and 4-balls on the wings;​
- winner breaks from anywhere behind the head string;​
- 3-foul rule in effect (did not happen);​
- foul on all balls;​
- no jump cues used (Strickland jumped a handful of times with a full cue);​
- no shot clock; and​
- all slop counts.​

■ Reyes broke 120 times -- successful 74 times (resulting in 51 game wins and 23 losses), 11 fouls (2 wins, 9 losses), and 35 dry (14 wins, 21 losses).

■ Strickland broke 117 times -- successful 95 times (resulting in 59 game wins and 36 losses), 6 fouls (2 wins, 4 losses), and 16 dry (3 wins, 13 losses).

■ Accu-Stats Total Performance Averages (TPAs) -- Reyes .911, Strickland .912 (Source: Accu-Stats product catalog)

For the following four measures, stats are shown for Reyes first, then Strickland, then combined.

Successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
............................Reyes....................Strickland.....................Both
Day 1 -- 52% (17 of 33)........74% (25 of 34)........63% (42 of 67)
Day 2 -- 52% (16 of 31)........77% (27 of 35)........65% (43 of 66)
Day 3 -- 73% (41 of 56)........90% (43 of 48)........81% (84 of 104)
Total .-- 62% (74 of 120).....81% (95 of 117).....71% (169 of 237)

Breaker won game:
............................Reyes....................Strickland.....................Both
Day 1 -- 48% (16 of 33)........53% (18 of 34)........51% (34 of 67)
Day 2 -- 48% (15 of 31)........54% (19 of 35)........52% (34 of 66)
Day 3 -- 64% (36 of 56)........56% (27 of 48)........61% (63 of 104)
Total .-- 56% (67 of 120).....55% (64 of 117).....55% (131 of 237)

Break-and-run games -- on all breaks:
............................Reyes....................Strickland......................Both
Day 1 -- 24% (8 of 33)..........29% (10 of 34).........27% (18 of 67)
Day 2 -- 26% (8 of 31)..........43% (15 of 35).........35% (23 of 66)
Day 3 -- 43% (24 of 56)........31% (15 of 48).........38% (39 of 104)
Total .-- 33% (40 of 120).....34% (40 of 117)......34% (80 of 237)

Break-and-run games -- on successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
............................Reyes....................Strickland.......................Both
Day 1 -- 47% (8 of 17)..........40% (10 of 25)..........43% (18 of 42)
Day 2 -- 50% (8 of 16)..........56% (15 of 27)..........53% (23 of 43)
Day 3 -- 59% (24 of 41)........35% (15 of 43)..........46% (39 of 84)
Total . -- 54% (40 of 74).......42% (40 of 95)..........47% (80 of 169)

Fouls and foul rates: [Note: "games at the table" means total games less opponent's B&R games.]
Reyes -- 30 fouls (including 11 on the break) in 197 games at the table (a rate of 1 foul for every 6.6 games at the table)
Strickland -- 23 fouls (including 6 on the break) in 197 games at the table (a rate of 1 foul for every 8.6 games at the table)
Total -- 53 fouls in 237 games (1 per 4.5 games)

Missed shots (est.):
Reyes -- 32 misses in 197 games at the table (a rate of 1 for every 6.2 games at the table)
Strickland -- 44 misses in 197 games at the table (a rate of 1 for every 4.5 games at the table)
Total -- 76 misses in 237 games (1 per 3.1 games)

Run-outs from first shot after break:
By Reyes after his own successful break -- 40 of 74 (54%)
By Reyes after Strickland's failed break -- 10 of 22 (45%)
By Reyes, total -- 50 of 96 (52%)

By Strickland after his own successful break -- 40 of 95 (42%)
By Strickland after Reyes' failed break -- 19 of 46 (41%)
By Strickland, total -- 59 of 141 (42%)

Total for Reyes and Strickland -- 109 of 237 (46%)

Run-outs from first shot after Reyes' break:
By Reyes -- 40 of 74 (54%)
By Strickland -- 19 of 46 (41%)
Total -- 59 of 120 (49%)

Run-outs from first shot after Strickland's break:
By Strickland -- 40 of 95 (42%)
By Reyes -- 10 of 22 (45%)
Total -- 50 of 117 (43%)

Balls Pocketed:
Reyes -- 127 on the break, 864 not on the break, 991 in total
Strickland -- 162 on the break, 884 not on the break, 1,046 in total
[Includes balls pocketed on breaking fouls (16 by Reyes and 8 by Strickland) and on fouls after the break (5 by Reyes and 4 by Strickland).]

Average number of balls made on the break:
Reyes -- 1.1 on all breaks, 1.5 on successful breaks
Strickland -- 1.4 on all breaks, 1.6 on successful breaks
Total -- 1.2 on all breaks, 1.6 on successful breaks

Break-and-run packages:
Reyes' 40 B&R games consisted of six 3-packs (1 on Day 1, 1 on Day 2, and 4 on Day 3), four 2-packs and 14 singles.
Strickland's 40 B&R games consisted of one 5-pack (on Day 3), one 4-pack (Day 2), two 3-packs (1 on Day 2 and 1 on Day 3), four 2-packs, and 17 singles.

Games with 1 or more safeties (est.):
30% of all games and 46% of games that were not B&Rs

Number of innings:
62% (146 of 237) of the games ended in one inning -- 80 games on the breaker's first inning (B&R games) and 66 games on the non-breaker's first inning
27% (64 of 237) of the games ended in the second inning.
11% (27 of 237) of the games went beyond the non-breaker's second visit to the table, with the longest game ending on the breaker's 6th visit.

Distribution of consecutive game wins, i.e. winning streaks. Counts are given for Reyes first, then Strickland, then the total.
1 game -- 24 times, 25 times, 49 times​
2 games -- 9, 12, 21​
3 games -- 11, 6, 17​
4 games -- 5, 4, 9​
5 games -- 2, 4, 6​
6 games -- 1, 0, 1 [Reyes' wins 90 through 95 (Day 3)]​
7 games -- 0, 2, 2 [Strickland's wins 8 through 14 (Day 1) and 82 through 88 (Day 3)]​
9 games -- 1, 0, 1 [Reyes' wins 96 through 104 (Day 3)]​

Biggest leads each day by each player:
Day 1 -- Reyes led by 2 at 3-1; Strickland led by 6 at 8-14
Day 2 -- Reyes never led; Strickland led by 11 at 50-61
Day 3 -- Reyes led by 4 at 117-113; Strickland led by 17 at 87-104

Lead changes and tied scores:
Day 1 -- 8 lead changes; score tied 17 times (with the last tie at 28 games each)
Day 2 -- no lead changes; no tie scores
Day 3 -- 1 lead change (at 112-111); score tied twice (at 111 and 117). [Note: after Strickland's 17-game lead at 87-104, Reyes won 24 of the next 31 games (including16 wins by B&R on his 23 breaks in this stretch) to tie the score at 111.]

9-balls on the break -- 5 times: 4 by Reyes and 1 by Strickland -- 2.1% of all 237 breaks.

Match length -- Approximately 13½ hours, for an average of 3.4 minutes per game. This includes racking and brief timeouts but excludes several 30-minute breaks.
 
Last edited:

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
what are all the stats needed for
or just a hobby?
Stats on pool tournaments and challenge matches are not really "needed," but they are interesting (to some of us) and can be useful. Yes, I guess doing the stats has been a hobby of mine. I've never worked for anyone in doing it, although I have been asked to do so several times.

This Reyes/Strickland match is one of history's most famous. But I had never seen or heard any statistics on the match other than comments about the size of Reyes' comeback. So I decided to take the time to watch the match and produce some stats.
 

fjk

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
One miss every 6.2 games. Seems low to me. How does that compare to today's top guys?
1714499294236.png
 

King T

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Stats on pool tournaments and challenge matches are not really "needed," but they are interesting (to some of us) and can be useful. Yes, I guess doing the stats has been a hobby of mine. I've never worked for anyone in doing it, although I have been asked to do so several times.

This Reyes/Strickland match is one of history's most famous. But I had never seen or heard any statistics on the match other than comments about the size of Reyes' comeback. So I decided to take the time to watch the match and produce some stats.

Me and many of my friends have argued about the match for years so this will rekindle the who is the greatest debate..., and I cant wait! Thanks!
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
I seem to remember Earl missed a relatively easy 9 ball when he had huge lead on day 3 and then it turned into the Efren show for quite a while.
Yes, Earl missed that 9-ball when he had a 12 game lead at 93-105. Efren had to bank the 9-ball straight back to win the game. Earl led by 17 games 8 games before that, at 87-104. That missed 9-ball was in a stretch where Efren won 8 of 9 games, taking the lead down to 10. Earl then won 4 in a row to lead by 14, but Reyes won 16 of the next 18 games to reach a tie at 111-111. Then they each won 6 games to take it to the last tie at 117-117.
 

lfigueroa

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
My recollection, from conversations with someone who was there, there was lots of behind the scenes drama at that match in addition to what was going on on the table.

Regardless, it is a classic and if you love pool it's worth a watch.

Lou Figueroa
 

Poolmanis

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Stats show clearly that Earl had huge advantage on breaks. Reyes just ran out a lot higher rate when got chance.
So Efren was superior at table after break!
He was so good back then he just won even he gave up a lot handicap to best breakers.
Of course he had decent break but not like best breakers.
 

JoeyInCali

Maker of Joey Bautista Cues
Silver Member
My recollection, from conversations with someone who was there, there was lots of behind the scenes drama at that match in addition to what was going on on the table.

Regardless, it is a classic and if you love pool it's worth a watch.

Lou Figueroa
The promoter was dead the year after that.
Apparent suicide.

Some of Efren's backers didn't even show up on the third day because Efren was getting blown out.
Earl scratched on the break at 117 all then lost his marbles.
 
Last edited:

kling&allen

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Stats on pool tournaments and challenge matches are not really "needed," but they are interesting (to some of us) and can be useful. Yes, I guess doing the stats has been a hobby of mine. I've never worked for anyone in doing it, although I have been asked to do so several times.

This Reyes/Strickland match is one of history's most famous. But I had never seen or heard any statistics on the match other than comments about the size of Reyes' comeback. So I decided to take the time to watch the match and produce some stats.

I think you are familiar with Charlie Ursitti’s work on pool and billiard tournaments of the golden era. It’s the main source of data for entire generations of play.

Have you compiled all your stats into a single database that you could publish?
 
Top