i agree it's not pointless but i prefer live sports. when they put filler vs svb on the railbird table in the latter stages of the 1p last year, that was really annoying. especially since they put a low level 9-ball match on the accustat table
Streaming 2025 Derby City
- Thread starter Brookeland Bill
- Start date
i agree it's not pointless but i prefer live sports. when they put filler vs svb on the railbird table in the latter stages of the 1p last year, that was really annoying. especially since they put a low level 9-ball match on the accustat table
Badpenguin
Well-known member
I have to eat my words a little bit, they added commentary and posted some of their videos in March, 1-2 months after the event. For example the SVB vs Joshua Filler 13th round 1P match. Unbelievable that match wasn't on a main streaming table.
and you know for certain that isn't criticism they'll take in
QR Code Scanner & Decoder - QR Code To Text Online | QRCodeRaptor
QRCodeRaptor.Com is the ultimate QR code scanner & decoder tool. With our online web application, you can scan and decode QR codes with just a few clicks. Simply use your webcam to scan the QR code, or upload a QR code image to read and extract the text. QRCodeRaptor.Com is fast, accurate, and...
qrcoderaptor.com
Badpenguin
Well-known member
An event page on digitalpool.com is out there, maybe they are trying to do live scoring this year. It shows 473 players in banks.
Badpenguin
Well-known member
Looks like they are going all out with scoring on digitalpool. It can't be easy to come up with a way to track results of the DCC buyback system, but it looks like they are trying. Hopefully the players will cooperate and actually keep score during their games, and the network/internet at the location will cooperate also.
Looks like WNT TV will stream (only) the 9-Ball tournament. streaming starts on the 22nd:
From the Derby website:
Attachments
Badpenguin
Well-known member
Badpenguin
Well-known member
Well this is pointless, lol.
jax_joe
Well-known member
The schedule they posted a couple of days ago on Facebook shows Banks at 10:00 and Bigfoot at 1:00.
Trying to watch Banks on billiardnet. Looks like they are using AOL dial-up
Fyi guys, live banks action here:
Badpenguin
Well-known member
Strreaming ladies matches:
www.youtube.com
LFR Live
Billiards & Pool Live Streaming Welcome to the official LFR Live Channel. Streaming all things pool related. Bringing top talent & some of the most exciting billiard players straight to your TV. LFR is an abbreviation for Lonnie Fox Raymond, your host. She has been competing at a high...
www.youtube.com
Bigfoot bracket out, yet?
Badpenguin
Well-known member
Well, it was fun while it lasted. Attempting to cast the feature table to my tv makes it unwatchable, just freezes up every 10-20 seconds.
Is anyone able to watch the feature table on a TV?
Is anyone able to watch the feature table on a TV?
Badpenguin
Well-known member
DigitalPool - Bridging the gap between player and technology
Create and manage your own pool leagues and tournaments and challenge other players from around the pool world.
TPA mistake?
In the Filler/De Luna Bigfoot match just played, they didn't show any TPAs as the match proceeded, but then at the end they posted .869 for Filler and .663 for De Luna. I believe both of the numbers are wrong by a lot.
By my counts, Filler pocketed 86 balls and De Luna 54 (but he gets credit for only 53 because of fouling on the break for one of them). With those ball counts, an .869 for Filler would mean he had 13 errors (86/99 = .869) and a .663 for De Luna would mean he had 27 errors (53/80 = .663). That just didn't happen. Filler had a miss in Game 13 that probably counted as 2 errors for being easier than a spot shot, and he had a shot in Game 4 that was either a miss or a safety error. He also had a couple of position errors and perhaps another error somewhere along the way but I don't see a total of13 errors. And I think De Luna had, perhaps, a dozen errors, but not 27.
This mistake is a shame, because Filler's true TPA in that match may turn out to be the best of the event (although Corteza is already in with a .930).
In the Filler/De Luna Bigfoot match just played, they didn't show any TPAs as the match proceeded, but then at the end they posted .869 for Filler and .663 for De Luna. I believe both of the numbers are wrong by a lot.
By my counts, Filler pocketed 86 balls and De Luna 54 (but he gets credit for only 53 because of fouling on the break for one of them). With those ball counts, an .869 for Filler would mean he had 13 errors (86/99 = .869) and a .663 for De Luna would mean he had 27 errors (53/80 = .663). That just didn't happen. Filler had a miss in Game 13 that probably counted as 2 errors for being easier than a spot shot, and he had a shot in Game 4 that was either a miss or a safety error. He also had a couple of position errors and perhaps another error somewhere along the way but I don't see a total of13 errors. And I think De Luna had, perhaps, a dozen errors, but not 27.
This mistake is a shame, because Filler's true TPA in that match may turn out to be the best of the event (although Corteza is already in with a .930).
Last edited: