APA7 said:Sometimes I wonder if you just make a lot of shiit up![]()
Brian
I believe him, it's happened to me as well!
APA7 said:Sometimes I wonder if you just make a lot of shiit up![]()
Brian
Colin Colenso said:The key is the Magic Red dots in my diagrams.
The first system as introduced by this thread just happens to have its magic dot at the no.2 diamond. On my table it is actually a few inches from here, at the edge of the rail beside the diamond.
If you can remember the locations of these spots for the several systems I have diagrammed, and quickly adjust the positions with a few tests on new tables, you have a comprehensive system that doesn't require looking for diamonds or doing any math.
btw: Bob's comments on locating the distance are spot on. Test at the two extremes and connect the lines. Where they join is the magic distance point for each aim location. Usually comes out to about 8 feet from the table edge for me. That usually puts you close enough to make the hit anyway.
Colin,Colin Colenso said:Here is another system I am working on. Again, lines are projected out about 8 feet from the table.
The spots for a touch of english and maximum english are drawn. They may change a bit for some tables.
Hi Tracey,RSB-Refugee said:Colin,
Just so I better understand, could you draw the lines of your system to the drawing, that I added a new cue ball and a striped object ball?
Thanks,
Tracy
The system begins a lot like a system called the "Opposite 3" which is described in Byrne's "Wonderful World of Billiards" book, except that system uses running english. The idea there is that if you hit opposite "3" on the long rail (your system goes "through" 2) the cue ball will land on the third rail exactly across from your starting location. The interesting extension in your system is the spot on the wall to allow other cue ball origins.supergreenman said:I came across this 3 rail kick system a couple of weeks ago and have tried it out at several different places. ...
APA7 said:Sometimes I wonder if you just make a lot of shiit up
Bob Jewett said:The system begins a lot like a system called the "Opposite 3" which is described in Byrne's "Wonderful World of Billiards" book, except that system uses running english. The idea there is that if you hit opposite "3" on the long rail (your system goes "through" 2) the cue ball will land on the third rail exactly across from your starting location. The interesting extension in your system is the spot on the wall to allow other cue ball origins.
I tried your system today. The reference point on my table is not diamond 2. Instead it is a point about 4 inches off the table pretty much along the 2-2 line that you illustrated. A good test shot is to shoot from the side pocket and try to go to the opposite side pocket. On my table, diamond 2 has no chance to work for this.
Also, if the cue ball starts from the end rail, it always ends up too long, so some additional correction is needed.
In all, the system is much more accurate than I expected. Most 3-rail systems use running english allegedly for consistency, but this seems to be about as accurate as the normal corner-5 system if you have figured out the adjustments.
On most pool tables, the "opposite 3" system reference point is on the cloth between the second and third diamonds. On a carom table, the nominal reference point is the rail groove at diamond 3. The pool table case and some other diamond systems are described in the BD article at http://www.sfbilliards.com/articles/1999-12.pdf
Billy_Bob said:Perhaps I am just an "inkblot"?
The Rorschach Test...
http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/rorschach.php