Dave...as ANT812 suggested, shot speed ought to be a function of nothing more than the shape required on the next shot.
Of course, there are often several ways to get shape. Soquet typically uses minimal CB travel and will take a longer/harder shot by moving the CB 1 foot, instead going 2 rails to create an easier shot.
On the other hand, Earl seems to like to run it 3 rails seemingly for no reason other than he CAN! (-:
In your case, based on what you posted, it seems to me that...for example...you might choose a stun run through on a longish shot to send the CB forward a diamond rather than to roll it.
That's fine. Stun run throughs are one of my most practiced shots. I too don't like rolling shots partly because the stroke can feel contrived as you suggest and partly because of table/cloth imperfections.
But as far as slow paced shots feeling contrived, I was taught by a very top player to severely shorten my bridge length...move the grip hand forward to achieve a perpendicular forearm....and then be able to take a "full backstroke" all the way back to my bridge hand...BUT...due to the short bridge, that full backstroke is sometimes only an inch or two.
Stroked that way, slow paced shots feel fine...featuring a true, smoothly acceleration forward stroke but one which is so short that the accelleration is not allowed to generate much speed.
But bottom line...the questions are:
1. How often do you miss makable shots and
2. When you do miss, would a slower pace have avoided it.
For 99% of all amateur players, the answers to the above two questions would be...1. Too often and 2. Yes.
Regards,
Jim
Of course, there are often several ways to get shape. Soquet typically uses minimal CB travel and will take a longer/harder shot by moving the CB 1 foot, instead going 2 rails to create an easier shot.
On the other hand, Earl seems to like to run it 3 rails seemingly for no reason other than he CAN! (-:
In your case, based on what you posted, it seems to me that...for example...you might choose a stun run through on a longish shot to send the CB forward a diamond rather than to roll it.
That's fine. Stun run throughs are one of my most practiced shots. I too don't like rolling shots partly because the stroke can feel contrived as you suggest and partly because of table/cloth imperfections.
But as far as slow paced shots feeling contrived, I was taught by a very top player to severely shorten my bridge length...move the grip hand forward to achieve a perpendicular forearm....and then be able to take a "full backstroke" all the way back to my bridge hand...BUT...due to the short bridge, that full backstroke is sometimes only an inch or two.
Stroked that way, slow paced shots feel fine...featuring a true, smoothly acceleration forward stroke but one which is so short that the accelleration is not allowed to generate much speed.
But bottom line...the questions are:
1. How often do you miss makable shots and
2. When you do miss, would a slower pace have avoided it.
For 99% of all amateur players, the answers to the above two questions would be...1. Too often and 2. Yes.
Regards,
Jim