Billy_Bob said:Are there some tournaments where picture taking is not allowed?
I assume flash pictures are a no no?
Any picture taking advice/warnings when doing this at a tournament while players are shooting?
Billy_Bob said:Are there some tournaments where picture taking is not allowed?
I assume flash pictures are a no no?
Any picture taking advice/warnings when doing this at a tournament while players are shooting?
TX Poolnut said:One other thing: Don't try to get that picture of a shooter aiming directly at the camera while in the middle of a match, even from ten feet away. Standing in the line of a players' shot is likely to get you an evil look. Wait till the game is over and then get the player to "pose." That's the only time I've ever accidently disturbed a shooter. Lesson learned.
Billy_Bob said:Are there some tournaments where picture taking is not allowed?
I assume flash pictures are a no no?
Any picture taking advice/warnings when doing this at a tournament while players are shooting?
No offense, but that's a great way to get crappy pictures. After all, they're going to be at the resolution of your camera, and a picture that looks great moving at 30 fps isn't going to look so great still-framed. By the way, that resolution is:sizl said:I have a Sony DCR-PC9 Mini DV Camcorder. It is perfect for taking pictures at any live event. It has the capabilities of taking pictures off of the video you have recorded. You can record a video and go frame by frame until you get the shot you want and take the pic. Great for MPEG's as well.
So 0.7 megapixels. Hardly something you can print and stick on a wall, at any size. Maybe in your wallet... maybe.sizl said:Advanced HAD™ CCD 1 / 4" CCD with 680,000 Pixels.
FWIW, avoid looking at the digital zoom when you buy a camera. It's useless. You can just crop and enlarge in photo editing software and get better results. That's all the camera is doing - cropping and enlarging - in its "digital" realm. Perhaps applying a bit of an unsharp mask, too, but again software is better and more flexible here. Only look at optical zoom.sizl said:10X Optical/120X Digital Zoom.
iacas said:No offense, but that's a great way to get crappy pictures.
Again, you're limited to .7 megapixels. Typically around your NTSC or PAL scale, too, so 720 x 480 or 640 x 480 (etc.).sizl said:I am not going to get into a debate about this as I am in no way an expert (or even close.) All I know is that I have got some pretty good results from taking pics of of the video I have shot. I will let you be the judge, here are some action shots I took off of video.
Brian, thank you for the kind words.Brian in VA said:Rich R. who posts on here occasionally and frequently on BD, is a master at pool photography and can give you many insights. He took some shots at our Virginia 9 Ball Championships last year and they were terrific. He even made me look like I can play.PM him or post on BD and I'm sure he'll give you some ideas. He's very giving with his help.
Brian in VA
Sizl, you did get some decent results, however, all of the pictures you provided are scenes in full sun with a large amount of light. In general, pool tournaments are very low light situations. I'm not too familiar with the process of getting still pictures from videos, so I have to ask, can you get good results in extreme low light situations? Also, do you get enough resolution for 8X10, or larger, prints?sizl said:I am not going to get into a debate about this as I am in no way an expert (or even close.) All I know is that I have got some pretty good results from taking pics of of the video I have shot. I will let you be the judge, here are some action shots I took off of video.
I love it!
iacas said:Again, you're limited to .7 megapixels. Typically around your NTSC or PAL scale, too, so 720 x 480 or 640 x 480 (etc.).
If you want to shoot video, shoot video with a video cam. If you want still pictures, shoot stills with a still photo camera.
Lots of cameras offer the ability to do both, but they always do the secondary one pretty "crappily." The optics for video don't need to be anywhere near as good as they do for photography and the resolution used in photography is way too high to use the optics efficiently for video (in any device under, oh, $150k or so anyway).
Your opinion of "pretty good" may differ from mine, but those pictures aren't of good quality. I'd have not said more, but I don't want the original poster thinking he can go shoot video and get "good" stills from it.
For comparison's sake, look at these. These are just a high-level amateur's photos shot with some pretty good equipment, but the images have been scaled down dramatically.
Rich R. said:I'm not too familiar with the process of getting still pictures from videos, so I have to ask, can you get good results in extreme low light situations? Also, do you get enough resolution for 8X10, or larger, prints?