Starting right now. and afterwards fats is playing lassiter on the same chanel
It like a nightmare isnt it. --- Keith mcready
It like a nightmare isnt it. --- Keith mcready
TXsouthpaw said:Starting right now. and afterwards fats is playing lassiter on the same chanel
It like a nightmare isnt it. --- Keith mcready
jay helfert said:It was interesting to watch a piece of TCOM again. I see what I did and didn't like about it. The script was mediocre, the acting tepid (except for Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) and the dialogue contrived. What was good was the Cinematography or camera work. They made pool look exciting with the sounds and movement of the balls. The accompanying music was great too.
I cringed when Newman throws open his case, almost dropping it on the table. He bangs his cue around like he's playing pick up sticks, both when putting it together and taking it apart. And when he and Cruise lag, they actually bump cues. OMG! They were somewhat clueless about how a pool player treats his equipment, especially his cue. Someone dropped the ball when it came to coaching these guys in this aspect of the game. I mean these are "supposed" to be professional pool players being depicted here, and they treat their cues like strange foreign objects.
The great scenes of flying balls with cool sound effects and music save the movie. Not one of Scorsece's best.
jay helfert said:It was interesting to watch a piece of TCOM again. I see what I did and didn't like about it. The script was mediocre, the acting tepid (except for Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) and the dialogue contrived. What was good was the Cinematography or camera work. They made pool look exciting with the sounds and movement of the balls. The accompanying music was great too.
I cringed when Newman throws open his case, almost dropping it on the table. He bangs his cue around like he's playing pick up sticks, both when putting it together and taking it apart. And when he and Cruise lag, they actually bump cues. OMG! They were somewhat clueless about how a pool player treats his equipment, especially his cue. Someone dropped the ball when it came to coaching these guys in this aspect of the game. I mean these are "supposed" to be professional pool players being depicted here, and they treat their cues like strange foreign objects.
The great scenes of flying balls with cool sound effects and music save the movie. Not one of Scorsece's best.
jay helfert said:It was interesting to watch a piece of TCOM again. I see what I did and didn't like about it. The script was mediocre, the acting tepid (except for Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) and the dialogue contrived. What was good was the Cinematography or camera work. They made pool look exciting with the sounds and movement of the balls. The accompanying music was great too.
I cringed when Newman throws open his case, almost dropping it on the table. He bangs his cue around like he's playing pick up sticks, both when putting it together and taking it apart. And when he and Cruise lag, they actually bump cues. OMG! They were somewhat clueless about how a pool player treats his equipment, especially his cue. Someone dropped the ball when it came to coaching these guys in this aspect of the game. I mean these are "supposed" to be professional pool players being depicted here, and they treat their cues like strange foreign objects.
The great scenes of flying balls with cool sound effects and music save the movie. Not one of Scorsece's best.
There were gafs far worse than these in the movie. A lot of ball positions changed from frame to frame during the movie. In the opening game sequence, when Cruise is running the rack, he ends up with perfect shape on a ball in the side pocket. The camera pans away, then comes back, and now the shot is a dead bank into the opposite side. Also, when Cruise is playing Mozelle at Chalky's, he ends up with an angle on the 5 into the corner. When the camera comes back, it's dead straight, and Cruise is able to shoot the shot no hands with the cue and his chin. There are other ones during the movie, but these are HUGE. Sigel should have at least said something about these, being the technical advisor. Every time I come to these two spots, I cringe.jay helfert said:It was interesting to watch a piece of TCOM again. I see what I did and didn't like about it. The script was mediocre, the acting tepid (except for Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) and the dialogue contrived. What was good was the Cinematography or camera work. They made pool look exciting with the sounds and movement of the balls. The accompanying music was great too.
I cringed when Newman throws open his case, almost dropping it on the table. He bangs his cue around like he's playing pick up sticks, both when putting it together and taking it apart. And when he and Cruise lag, they actually bump cues. OMG! They were somewhat clueless about how a pool player treats his equipment, especially his cue. Someone dropped the ball when it came to coaching these guys in this aspect of the game. I mean these are "supposed" to be professional pool players being depicted here, and they treat their cues like strange foreign objects.
The great scenes of flying balls with cool sound effects and music save the movie. Not one of Scorsece's best.
Shawn Armstrong said:There were gafs far worse than these in the movie. A lot of ball positions changed from frame to frame during the movie. In the opening game sequence, when Cruise is running the rack, he ends up with perfect shape on a ball in the side pocket. The camera pans away, then comes back, and now the shot is a dead bank into the opposite side. Also, when Cruise is playing Mozelle at Chalky's, he ends up with an angle on the 5 into the corner. When the camera comes back, it's dead straight, and Cruise is able to shoot the shot no hands with the cue and his chin. There are other ones during the movie, but these are HUGE. Sigel should have at least said something about these, being the technical advisor. Every time I come to these two spots, I cringe.