Prior to the onset of the WPC, I expressed grave concern that the fact that American pro events are contested on such loose equipment would hurt the chances of the American contingent. This would have concerned me even if the WPC were contested on loose equipment, but when I learned tight equipment would be in use my concern grew even more. Now that the curtain has closed on the WPC for all but two magnficent players from Taiwan, it seems a good time to reflect on whether the American contingent was or wasn't hurt by the fact that the don't compete on tough equipment on the UPA, the qualifying tour for the WPC.
It is my considered opinion that America HAS PAID A PRICE for conducting its top pro events on loose equipment, and that price is that we are no longer the best ball pocketers in the world. Some of our top pros practice almost exclusively on tight equipment, but there's no substitute for competing on tight pockets.
Some of our pros, Grady Matthews in particular, have posted about how ridiculous these tournaments played on loose equipment really are, but until the governing organizations of American pool see the light, we're not on the road back to true prominence on the world stage. Without a switch to tougher equipment, I believe the pedigree of American pool will remain in decline.
We've had only one of the last eight in each of the last three WPC events and not a single finalist. Will we Americans make excuses or will we make the fixes that will give our best a greater chance to succeed? I hope it's the latter.
I'd like to hear from others on this. Has loose pocket competition reduced the pedigree of the elite American pool players or not?
It is my considered opinion that America HAS PAID A PRICE for conducting its top pro events on loose equipment, and that price is that we are no longer the best ball pocketers in the world. Some of our top pros practice almost exclusively on tight equipment, but there's no substitute for competing on tight pockets.
Some of our pros, Grady Matthews in particular, have posted about how ridiculous these tournaments played on loose equipment really are, but until the governing organizations of American pool see the light, we're not on the road back to true prominence on the world stage. Without a switch to tougher equipment, I believe the pedigree of American pool will remain in decline.
We've had only one of the last eight in each of the last three WPC events and not a single finalist. Will we Americans make excuses or will we make the fixes that will give our best a greater chance to succeed? I hope it's the latter.
I'd like to hear from others on this. Has loose pocket competition reduced the pedigree of the elite American pool players or not?