I get that some ppl want to see CTE proven thru math. We all want to know how something works on some level.
The main controversy stems from those who want to disprove something bc it goes against their so called "beliefs" or bc they themselves can't or aren't willing to do it.
Obviously I stand on the side of CTE, Hal and Stan's work on the topic has been tremendous. Let me start by saying this upfront though. Although I know the ins and outs of the system it does not mean that I'm a world beater or that I can make every shot everytime.
Knowing the system is one thing execution is another. But the main point is that what Stan has discovered is so revolutionary and profound that I think it's a bit of shock and if ur not ready for it then u should probably wait till ur a little more grown up to learn it.
I see a lot of ppl bring up fractional aiming and ghost ball as a direct comparison to CTE and what it represents. Ghost all and fractional aiming is a physics/math explanation of what occurs at the pool table when spheres collide.
CTE or ProOne is an explanation of how the human body and vision execute a pool shot. No different from an explanation of how to stand or stroke a ball.
I find that the argument everyone seems to use of fractions or ghost ball is how the body sees and executes is ridiculous. It's the same as if a student driver was handed a manual of how the car engine works and be expected to drive based on that.
Stan's work is the first and only to explain how the body is able to make a pool shot. What most of the world sees when they line up a shot is pretty close to the precise visuals that we use in CTE. But why aren't they able to make the ball aside from stroke errors? Bc what most of us see at ball address is the shotline without a calculation for CIT or throw.
When u don't know how to move into the CB you are essentially hitting the ball where u want but that doesn't account for throw. Therefore you miss and are perplexed as to why bc u swear that's where it supposed to be contacted.
When u say that ghostball or fractions is the way to aim then why hasn't anyone said how to arrive at that aim? How do u move into the shot? How do I line up the edge of the CB to make that perfect overlap? And once I find that how or when do I adjust for the CIT?
See the folly in the argument? CTE ProOne is a professional aiming system. It's what the pros are doing whether they know it or not. Just the same as professionals are making the spheres collide at the perfect fraction or ghostball.
One is physics and math. The other is the human body. I never heard an argument that a NBA player must be calculating the arc and trajectory of a jumper. Yes that's what's occurring but how he arrives at that point is purely physical.
So yeah,... I'm sure most will read half of this post and go back to their folly but for the few that make it to end that's what's occurring on its most basic level.
The main controversy stems from those who want to disprove something bc it goes against their so called "beliefs" or bc they themselves can't or aren't willing to do it.
Obviously I stand on the side of CTE, Hal and Stan's work on the topic has been tremendous. Let me start by saying this upfront though. Although I know the ins and outs of the system it does not mean that I'm a world beater or that I can make every shot everytime.
Knowing the system is one thing execution is another. But the main point is that what Stan has discovered is so revolutionary and profound that I think it's a bit of shock and if ur not ready for it then u should probably wait till ur a little more grown up to learn it.
I see a lot of ppl bring up fractional aiming and ghost ball as a direct comparison to CTE and what it represents. Ghost all and fractional aiming is a physics/math explanation of what occurs at the pool table when spheres collide.
CTE or ProOne is an explanation of how the human body and vision execute a pool shot. No different from an explanation of how to stand or stroke a ball.
I find that the argument everyone seems to use of fractions or ghost ball is how the body sees and executes is ridiculous. It's the same as if a student driver was handed a manual of how the car engine works and be expected to drive based on that.
Stan's work is the first and only to explain how the body is able to make a pool shot. What most of the world sees when they line up a shot is pretty close to the precise visuals that we use in CTE. But why aren't they able to make the ball aside from stroke errors? Bc what most of us see at ball address is the shotline without a calculation for CIT or throw.
When u don't know how to move into the CB you are essentially hitting the ball where u want but that doesn't account for throw. Therefore you miss and are perplexed as to why bc u swear that's where it supposed to be contacted.
When u say that ghostball or fractions is the way to aim then why hasn't anyone said how to arrive at that aim? How do u move into the shot? How do I line up the edge of the CB to make that perfect overlap? And once I find that how or when do I adjust for the CIT?
See the folly in the argument? CTE ProOne is a professional aiming system. It's what the pros are doing whether they know it or not. Just the same as professionals are making the spheres collide at the perfect fraction or ghostball.
One is physics and math. The other is the human body. I never heard an argument that a NBA player must be calculating the arc and trajectory of a jumper. Yes that's what's occurring but how he arrives at that point is purely physical.
So yeah,... I'm sure most will read half of this post and go back to their folly but for the few that make it to end that's what's occurring on its most basic level.
