pocketspeed said:does anyone even care anymore? i was hoping that all these threads would disappear in the "upgrade".
brian
Actually, I thought these threads would be moved to the ancient history forum.
pocketspeed said:does anyone even care anymore? i was hoping that all these threads would disappear in the "upgrade".
brian
SUPERSTAR said:And she is allowed to do what she wants.
Yes, it sucks to be them, but if they think, or if anyone thinks that they are ENTITLED to have a say in what she does, or anyone that they buy in the calcutta, they are wrong.
This was an open tournament, as there are many out there. There are also men's only tournaments and women's only tournaments. You're complaint is ridiculous.stick8 said:come on captain k, get it off your chest!!! i just dont think women should be allowed in a mens tourny-- now many men you see in ladys????and yes i am smart enough to know ther are some women that can play.and am sure they can beat a old has been as myself, im now 70yr of age and just speaking my openion. just how i feel!!! STICK
So, let me get this straight. Jeanette Lee was approached by an unknown person in a crowd of many. In your post you say "she always has people hounding her for pictures and autographs, I go find her". You say this because (in some form of words) you believe that you're being magnanimous and doing her a favor. After all, finding her in order to offer an opportunity to buy half of herself was a gesture that you didn't have to do. Especially because you say "we think we got a steal" by buying her. So you assess her to be a surefire lock for return on the investment.
When you propose that she can buy half of herself from you, and she says "I'll let you know", you both put your honor on the line via a verbal contract. Thinking rationally: she would have a hard time finding you (as an unknown) in a crowd of many. So she makes the effort to go to the tournament director and announce that she will take the offer, which fulfills on her end of the bargain to let you know. You and everyone in the crowd knows of the verbal agreement.
At this point in time, if you don't believe that Jeanette Lee is good for the $70, then you have easy access to locate her and get the money in advance. Instead you sit in the crowd, remaining difficult to distinguish, even if you happen to be within 5 feet of her, or whatever. You make no effort to complete the agreed upon transaction.
Afterwards, you insist that she has no claim to half of the calcutta...
You can play it that way if you choose, but personally in this case (knowing that you have no reason to doubt someone like Jeanette Lee), I think I'd honor my word in the verbal agreement rather than try to stiff Jeanette Lee on a couple of hundred bucks.
Like I say, you can play it that way if you choose.
Personally, I'd honor my word.
Doesn't suprise me at all. I have never been a jeanette lee fan. Its amazing what arrogance and ego can do to some people...
It is amazing what arrogance and ego can do to and for some people. Arrogance and ego wins pool tournaments! It takes somebody pretty arrogant and with a pretty big ego to think they can beat the best.
Some hide it better than others but I have never met a champion that didn't have both arrogance and ego.
Hu
Actually, I thought these threads would be moved to the ancient history forum.
Just curious who the pro was?I've bared witness to this on another occasion down in drexelline billiards in upper darby, pa. Once again, it was another 'pro'. The guy who bought the 'pro' in the calcutta asked the 'pro' did want to buy half of himself, the 'pro' turned around and said ' let me see how i do and i'll get back to you' and walked away. Me, the buyer and another bystander all looked like scooby doo with that collcetive look on our faces like, wtf???????'...anyways,@the end of the tourney, the 'pro' won and then proceeded to collect 'his percentage' from the 'buyer'. The buyer turned around and was like ' man if you dont get the h%ll out of my face...etc. The pro looked in shock and disbelief like the buyer was wrong. Long story short, after a few more words were exchanged, the 'pro' didnt see a coin of the calcutta.
THERE IS A CODE OF ETHICS IN THE WORLD AND POOL WORLD FOR THAT MATTER THAT SHOULD BE PUT TO THE FOREFRONT AT ALL TIMES. WHETHER YOU ARE A 4-YEAR OLD GIRL OR A 4-TIME WORLD CHAMPION, A SUPERSTAR OR PUBLIC ENEMY #1, THE #1 PLAYER IN THE WORLD OR A SUPER NOBODY, THE RULES APPLY TO BOTH. IMO, The problem in todays pool world is that IT SEEMS we give A LITTLE too much respect to the 'higher ups' AND THAT ALLOWS THEM TO DO THINGS LIKE THIS. We love and appreciate what they do, but thats as far as it goes. As the bible says 'give every man his just due'. If you dont give money in the beginNing, dont expect to receive money in the end. 'Give and you shall receive'- SIMPLE MATHEMATICS.