Everyone does not hold another man in the esteem of being their intellectual pool god & does not hold grudges when someone disagrees with their pool god & then resort to making the vile, disgusting, & immoral inference that the one that disagrees with their pool god is a child molester as a means of revenge the way DTL did.
Pivoting is a very subjective procedure as is getting the exact point to perform such a subjective pivot that would be correct for any given shot.
It's an added maneuver that is not necessary.
Colin Colensco has done some very extensive study of pivoting & has relayed how much that the most minute variance can be detrimental to shots.
That said, if pivoting is used to employ BHE along with utilizing the pivot point of a cue stick, Colin has shown those to be very beneficial.
so... I am in basic agreement with Pidge & hence the thumbs up in referende to his posts.
Does that mean that one can not become rather proficient after a time of subjective learning through the course of trial & errors, successes & failures?
No it does not, just as one one can become proficient with the use of ghost ball with no pivot.
Both are subjectively learned methods.
I will also say this, I could see some advantage of approaching a shot from the same direction repeatedly. The cue has to get into position somehow.
I think it might be nice if there was no cue stick at all until one was completely set & then BAM the cue appears & on line that one has visually chosen for the shot.
I think most have heard the eyes lead.
So... once one has the line with their eyes... setting the cue on that line in a consistent manner might & probably would be advantageous.