Everyone keeps complaining about the spot shots and why don't they just play a 3rd set...seems pretty obvious to me (tho I'm a nobody)
How do you decide who breaks the 3rd set? Getting the break is usually a major advantage. Sure seems obvious to me that they want the tiebreak to be equal for both players, where as the player that doesn't get the break is at a disadvantage.
Someone compared the spot shots to flipping coins...huh? At least the spot shots are using the players skill to determine the outcome. Obviously not their skill at the complete game, but a pool skill nonetheless.
I'm not here to champion the decision, but I understand the thought behind it.