One problem is what to do when you run out of time. My feeling is that forfeiting the game is sometimes too large a penalty. Suppose both players are in time trouble and I run out of time first. We are playing to 35 and I have 34 while my opponent has 12 and only one minute of time left.Bob,
Bingo!
I have already developed a scoreboard/time clock/inning counter specifically for our 3-cushion players. It will not only keep the score, but it will automatically keep innings. A "game clock" is also an available feature. Unlike a "shot clock" it gives you an amount of time FOR YOUR ENTIRE GAME! (just like the chess clock)
Therefore, you can take your time when necessary on tough shots, but overall you need to keep things moving along. If you run out of time, you lose, regardless of the score. That'll speed things up.
I just want everyone to understand that NO PRIZE MONEY is donated BY THE USBA. It all comes from individuals that donate extra money towards the players' prize funds.
Nobody should find it difficult to agree with the above. It is just plain, good common sense.Don't intend to take a position in the debate, just want to provide some info that may be helpful. As BJ said, Europe has gone through this process in the past 20 years, and we've asked ourselves the same questions.
1) Time-keeping, in some form, is a very good thing from a spectator viewpoint, but more importantly, it is necessary to keep the playing field level. Being slow (by nature, or as a deliberate tactic) should not be an advantage.
2) The Dutch league (in the highest division, that is) uses time-clocks in its 50 pt matches, 50 sec, two time-outs. Works well, but there are several disadvantages. a) the clocks are very expensive, most brands are 700 / 900 euro, have never seen any under 500. b) they need to be operated by referees, using clickers. Experience has taught us, that no amateur will be able to referee and use the clickers, without some training and hours of experience. All sorts of things come into play: the use of cue-extensions, having to wait for the adjacent table, etc. If the ref forgets his clicker just once, you have an incident at the table, nobody wants that.
3) The Belgians use the chess clock, and I applaud that. a) responsibility goes back where it belongs: to the player. Wanna study a shot for three minutes? Go ahead, but you'll have to make up for it. Heated arguments about bathroom breaks, whether used for peeing or smoking, can be a thing of the past b) chess clocks cost next to nothing. c) a tournament director can plan rounds of play, knowing a match cannot last longer than x minutes.
sightline,
Please put him in touch with me. We are going to need a lot of financial support for the USBA National stream in April. We do not want to charge a fee to watch the Nationals but we want a professional well produced tournament. I think all U.S. viewers deserve to watch enjoyable matches from the best in our country.
How does chess clock work exactly?? A player has to finish the match with the given amount of time??
If both players having hard time scoring the points. Time is out but the match is not done... What would happen then??