I recently revisited the article about the tip size and shape available here : https://billiards.colostate.edu/faq/cue-tip/size-and-shape/
I noticed that in all of the diagrams, the cue tip is perfectly level (parallel with the table surface) at contact. Take a draw shot in real life, there is pretty much always an angle, sometimes quite steep. In that case the postulated 60° of arc might not be enough, and the miscues will likely happen at less distance from the center if the tip is not rounded enough.
Also most if not all circular tip shapers in the market have these two flaws in my experience:
1. The diameter of the indent may be correct, but the indent is often pretty shallow so you will not get the needed 60° of arc on your tip.
2. A freshly shaped tip using a standard nickel or dîme shaper will have a rather linear (straight) slope with a pointy middle, looking more like a cone than the arc of a circle.
Topic for conversation: how would you design the perfect shaper of a given radius to adress these shortcomings?
I noticed that in all of the diagrams, the cue tip is perfectly level (parallel with the table surface) at contact. Take a draw shot in real life, there is pretty much always an angle, sometimes quite steep. In that case the postulated 60° of arc might not be enough, and the miscues will likely happen at less distance from the center if the tip is not rounded enough.
Also most if not all circular tip shapers in the market have these two flaws in my experience:
1. The diameter of the indent may be correct, but the indent is often pretty shallow so you will not get the needed 60° of arc on your tip.
2. A freshly shaped tip using a standard nickel or dîme shaper will have a rather linear (straight) slope with a pointy middle, looking more like a cone than the arc of a circle.
Topic for conversation: how would you design the perfect shaper of a given radius to adress these shortcomings?
Last edited: