pharaoh68 said:If anyone thinks that 99.9% of your tip shaping is done by a cube of chalk, then I feel confident in saying that 99.9% of those people are purely and utterly retarded.
ShootingArts said:I have it on good authority that not more than 99.875% of tip shaping is done by the chalk. 99.9% is a gross exaggeration!
Hu
PS: I'll be marketing my chalk with the precision ground pocket in it already formed to a precise nickel or dime shape in the very near future. Get your preproduction orders in now. Regular price will be one dollar a cube but pricing for early orders will be drastically reduced to 99 cents!
Cue Freak said:To the OP-- I'm not trying to be abrasive here (pun intended) but if you read that thread earlier, then you saw the riot it caused. Why would you start another thread about it, other than to get a rise...?...
nevermind
Cue Freak said:To the OP-- I'm not trying to be abrasive here (pun intended) but if you read that thread earlier, then you saw the riot it caused. Why would you start another thread about it, other than to get a rise...?...
nevermind
pharaoh68 said:She asked because not everyone saw the other thread. She asked because the statement made (that started THIS thread) is the most ludicrous statement that has been made on this site to date (with the exception of Grassley telling me to pull my pants down and slide on the ice - :shrug: ) She asked because she wanted to know if everyone shared in this ridiculous thought or if there actually did still exist a small portion of posters here with a modicum of intelligence.
But if you feel a lneed to nitpick about someone's intentions, I'll join ya.
Why would you go out of your way to post your disapproval of this thread and its content, only to follow it up with the word 'nevermind'. By saying 'nevermind', you are expressing that you don't really care to learn the answer. If that's the case, why continue to post the question?!?!
You wanna nit-pick over someone's intentions??? Try not to make yourself look like a fool. It'll help your cause in the long-run.
Jude Rosenstock said:Wow, more static. Someone PM me when something of value gets posted, please?
poolmonkey said:I was just reading another thread and was just curious as to what you guys thought of this statement.
99.9% of your tip shaping is done with chalk, yes or no?
supergreenman said:No, while chalk is somewhat of an abrasive, it's so soft that it would take a 100 years to take a very small percentage off of a tip, most shaping of tips is done either by contact with the cue ball or intentional shaping/scuffing/tapping.
pharaoh68 said:She asked because not everyone saw the other thread. She asked because the statement made (that started THIS thread) is the most ludicrous statement that has been made on this site to date (with the exception of Grassley telling me to pull my pants down and slide on the ice - :shrug: ) She asked because she wanted to know if everyone shared in this ridiculous thought or if there actually did still exist a small portion of posters here with a modicum of intelligence.
But if you feel a lneed to nitpick about someone's intentions, I'll join ya.
Why would you go out of your way to post your disapproval of this thread and its content, only to follow it up with the word 'nevermind'. By saying 'nevermind', you are expressing that you don't really care to learn the answer. If that's the case, why continue to post the question?!?!
You wanna nit-pick over someone's intentions??? Try not to make yourself look like a fool. It'll help your cause in the long-run.
Jude Rosenstock said:Wow, more static. Someone PM me when something of value gets posted, please?
Blackjack said:Don't sweat it, Jude.
I remember a few years ago people were laughing at Joe Tucker's "pitchfork".
Keep selling those tip shapers.
Oh well...
Here's some more static - from a recently Certified Tip Googan.
![]()
:shrug:
poolmonkey said:I was just reading another thread and was just curious as to what you guys thought of this statement.
99.9% of your tip shaping is done with chalk, yes or no?
pharaoh68 said:Jude-
Check your PMs.
-B
Jude, you said it yourself.... very fine and good sandpaper. This is true, it is also true the Colorado river many thousands of years to carve out the Grand Canyon, the point I was trying to make was the compaction of the CB hitting your tip and the use of commercial scuffers and tip tappers have more to do with the shape of a tip than chalk.Jude Rosenstock said:Actually, sir, billiard chalk is composed of some of the hardest materials on Earth. It's very fine and very good sandpaper.
Jude Rosenstock said:Thanks for the laughs Blackjack. It's amazing, we just had this discussion in another thread. We posted the exact make-up of chalk, went over their properties and concluded chalk is very abrasive and now it seems we have to start all over again here and what's more, to even more antagonistic rhetoric.
Pharoah - seriously, I thought everything was quashed between us but I guess I was wrong.
supergreenman said:Jude, you said it yourself.... very fine and good sandpaper. This is true, it is also true the Colorado river many thousands of years to carve out the Grand Canyon, the point I was trying to make was the compaction of the CB hitting your tip and the use of commercial scuffers and tip tappers have more to do with the shape of a tip than chalk.
Respectfully yours,
SGM
As I said it took just under a minute to READ AND RESPOND to this. If my computer was a little faster it might not have taken so long. Now almost another minute is gone. ThanksBlack-Balled said:Its got a 3% chance of being such an item.
Edit:
BVal- how did your (first) post take you a minute?!?!?! WTF!?