ive never had the best or a great break and dont feel qualified to give my oppinion on it.drivermaker said:OK...for starters, answer Fred's post. That's a good one on breaking and your insights would be appreciated by one and all.
ive never had the best or a great break and dont feel qualified to give my oppinion on it.drivermaker said:OK...for starters, answer Fred's post. That's a good one on breaking and your insights would be appreciated by one and all.
ok sound good but i didnt spend 80+ post the last few days arguing with myself i hope. to post 80 posts i had to have at least 70 replies to respond to.Fred Agnir said:Maybe you should put less effort on defending yourself. Defending yourself isn't going to get anyone anywhere, considering nobody feels they're attacking.
I'd rather hear war stories, practice sessions, useful tidbits, and what it took to get over the hump.
Fred
mark tadd said:ive never had the best or a great break and dont feel qualified to give my oppinion on it.
mark tadd said:you cant expect me to answer every question. i dont answer every critisism either. sometime i forget to answer questions . but there are no ascuses if you pm or email me and i dont answer then shame on me
drivermaker said:Then what do you think the strong part of your game is/was that you can shed some light on? Christ...throw out SOME KIND of bone with a little meat on it.
Come to think of it, you can STILL answer the break questions. Even if you had a bad break...maybe your answers will shed some light on what NOT to do to get a Mark Tadd break.
mark tadd said:what does verbal skills and writing have to do with teaching? when i learned pool and figured out the things that i have, i didnt have to hear any flamboyent words or read any technical manuscripts on how to play the game.
you said, "Teaching is an art form, as is playing pool. Two separte entities." id like to know how are they separate entities. i think this is more of an opinion than a fact until proven.
Banker Burt said:Hello Mark,
You probaly won't remember me, but we spent a little time chatting at the Bank, one-pocket 9-ball event at he LA X Marriot.
You did real well back then but it seems you are more bent on proving yourself in this forum then you were in 93 to the endless pros you sent home in that tournament.
This is the general public of pool talking in these forums. You are a great player, but to me it sounds like your ego is disrupting your words.
People here would just like to know more about you, what made you a great player and maybe why your not playing anymore.
For me, I remember you saying (in 93) that there was something missing in your life. Have you found it and if so please share with us what it was and if not lighten up. we are just he commoners here and for me, I just want to wish you the very best in life.
Rich Reheard said:I doubt he is trying to prove himself to the general public, he has no reason to, just ask the people he has played. The guy was world I mean WORLD class, His opinion is very valued to alot of us. I guess I was one of the lucky ones who actually got to meet, watch, and talk with him a bit. I hope what he was missing in 93 was happiness and i for sure hope he found it. If so I'll bet he is as light as a feather. Pease, Rich,
PS. Don't mistake ego for knowlege,
mark tadd said:ty rich , i have no reason to prove myself for those that know me i think its was done in the past .i did however post a few storys of my life as growing up for those who wanted to know . and got very little response which is fine so what else do you guys want . almost all players i played wanted the 8 or more when i played including keith and he didnt like it on several occasions . since jam said it was laughable she can ask him..........hope i dont get slammed with bieng a ego maniac again its just a fact. if i dont post im a bad guy if i do im an eago maniac go figure![]()
![]()
![]()
mark tadd said:well strong parts of game? please be more spacific . as for my opinion on the break. i dont like giving my opinion if it not correct. when i come up with a solid answer that is true i will post on the break peace![]()
drivermaker said:OK Mark...I'll go along with that. If breaking wasn't your strong suit...I'd have to say you were one shootin' sumbitch then with the ability to knock balls in and move whitey pretty good.
So tell me how YOU like to apply english. You played against Buddy...he likes to twist his wrist just a little and use what he calls tuck and roll. Some guys use backhand english. How do YOU like to set up to the ball when you have a cut shot to hit it for english and what do you do?
Fred Agnir said:Maybe you should put less effort on defending yourself. Defending yourself isn't going to get anyone anywhere, considering nobody feels they're attacking.
I'd rather hear war stories, practice sessions, useful tidbits, and what it took to get over the hump.
Fred
drivermaker said:OK Mark...I'll go along with that. If breaking wasn't your strong suit...I'd have to say you were one shootin' sumbitch then with the ability to knock balls in and move whitey pretty good.
So tell me how YOU like to apply english. You played against Buddy...he likes to twist his wrist just a little and use what he calls tuck and roll. Some guys use backhand english. How do YOU like to set up to the ball when you have a cut shot to hit it for english and what do you do?
hondo said:DM, I'm beginning to think Tadd is deliberately not
answering your questions. It's kind of funny actually.
bruin70 said:IS THERE SOMETHING WEIRD GOING ON HERE?,,,,or hasn't anyone else caught it?
this isn't mark tadd posting!!!! not if you compare the diction on this thread with the diction on "mark tadd's" other posts! i would love to read what tadd has to say,,,but please,,,the real mark tadd.
Scott Lee said:Mark...As a professional instructor, I feel qualified to answer this question. A GREAT teacher needs excellent verbal skills in order to be able to effectively communicate with a wide variety of students. I often use different language when working with children vs. adults. Sometimes I explain something differently to a woman than a man.
www.poolknowledge.com
Jimmy M. said:This probably won't go over well, but I feel that you don't really know something unless you are capable of doing it. I can look at a golf swing - even a professional's golf swing - and pretty much understand what is going on and why. I may even see something that doesn't look right in their swing. However, I can't say that I *know* how to swing the club like them because I can't *do* it. For that reason, I'm not qualified to teach anyone else to swing a golf club. There are a few pool instructors (Randy G. being one) who can also play, but there are a lot of instructors out there who would have a tough time competing with any local 'B' player. I have to question how those people can teach someone else to play at a high level when they don't know how to do it themselves. That isn't to say they have no useful information but, as a student, I wouldn't expect any information that would get me past the level that my instructor was capable of playing himself (or herself). I do think there are exceptions to this rule but, in general, I would have a tough time believing there is no truth to what I've just said.