Yes, let's add China to the player development discussion, but your comments are right on the mark.
Tougher tables did not help USA pros for 20 years
- Thread starter iusedtoberich
- Start date
Half physical, half mental, half practice, half having good backers and half game choice for a total of 86%
The only way is reduced size pockets - pocket reducers - no thanks
Except for in FL after a little bit eve the smokers agreed that smoking outside was better
If anything, you would think the best BB players would or do play on the BBs
Until somebody is making 5 - 10 million plus, there will be NO coverage or interest
sjm. i dont defend the practice of splitting. i just dont care if they do it or not. and i see and understand why players do it.
one, is they dont want the money swings that large.
two, as said it takes all night and they want it over with.
and if the t.d. cares then he needs to announce all winnings will be physically handed to the winners in the order of finish, and in a check, and so will the 1099. in their name for the payout.
one, is they dont want the money swings that large.
two, as said it takes all night and they want it over with.
and if the t.d. cares then he needs to announce all winnings will be physically handed to the winners in the order of finish, and in a check, and so will the 1099. in their name for the payout.
That's asking a lot.
Some tournaments don't even report to Fargo, even though they ask for your fargorate before entry and claim they report to Fargo.
Speaking of,
Does anyone think they should have separate Fargorates for 7ft vs 9ft tables?
Sometimes I see an amateur player on stream and they have a decent FR (high 500/low 600) but will completely dog it on a 9ft table. Then the commentator will mention that the player mostly plays on barboxes, which explains the high fargorate.
A 600 FR on the 9ft table is completely different from a 600 FR that got their entire robustness up from playing on 7ft tournaments.
I feel like it creates too much of a disparity and not very accurate.
For example, let's say I'm a 600 and all my matches have been on 9ft tables.
My opponent is also 600 but all their matches have been on 7ft tables.
Our match is on a 9ft table.
I will be the clear favorite but according to FR it will be an even matchup.
Does anyone think they should have separate Fargorates for 7ft vs 9ft tables?
Sometimes I see an amateur player on stream and they have a decent FR (high 500/low 600) but will completely dog it on a 9ft table. Then the commentator will mention that the player mostly plays on barboxes, which explains the high fargorate.
A 600 FR on the 9ft table is completely different from a 600 FR that got their entire robustness up from playing on 7ft tournaments.
I feel like it creates too much of a disparity and not very accurate.
For example, let's say I'm a 600 and all my matches have been on 9ft tables.
My opponent is also 600 but all their matches have been on 7ft tables.
Our match is on a 9ft table.
I will be the clear favorite but according to FR it will be an even matchup.
That's true, amount of money being paid out matters too.
but svb also practiced / practices alone, and a lot. he's a lonewolf outlier in my opinion, most people can't do what he does and get those results. is/was there even one other 700+ player in south dakota?
The best BarBox players are also th best big table players, there no difference when it comes to players in this country. They just can't keep up with the rest of the world.
Im not sure you've ever played poker in your life at a poker room
If im Filler, Gorst, Shane, ko's, Im not splitting anything EVER!
If I can move to your state and be top 15 within a month of practicing- your state SUCKS
