Having come up with a trick-shot which appears to require lots of skill,(one of those things that just flips into one's brain) in fact, it appears more difficult than anything I have seen on TV or heard of, and perhaps more difficult than the one resulting in someone who was able to go 11 rails. The only thing mine and that person's shot have in common is that both shots begin by sending the cb airborne, though the techniques to send the cueball airborne may be different.. That is, if this one is not IMPOSSIBLE.
Now, this is where this idea came from and one of the difficulties I am having is determining what is happening in terms of physics/spin to that air borne cb. I had been doing a shot, mostly for fun, in which an ob was near a corner pocket, and could be easily pocketed with regular spin, but with, consequently after striking the cb, being only a few inches from the adjacent long rail, and what appeared to be a small angle of incidence. So in this shot, I hit the cb hard, with a nearly vertical downward strike, with a very small amount of inside. Then when the ball went airborne, it struck and pocketed the ob, and created a larger angle into the cushion than would normally be obtained with regular spin and then ran down the length of the table for a strike on the opposite end rail. So, not only was the angle increased, but so was the velocity. Now I am not sure where in this airborne strike the ob was hit, but it definitely hit the cushion airborn. I have speculated that the ob is hit at the beginning of the airborn arc, hitting the cushion on the downward arc, but again, not knowing for sure if this is what is happening.
So to be able to predict its action onto the other rails, I need to know what such a hit is DOING to the cb, to create such an effect. And, of course, I need to know the physics of that shot, and what velocity can be created to see if the rest of the shot is scientifically posible.
I have been emailing with Tom Rossman, who right off the bat agreed to look at the shot,and determine if it can be done, once I can provide him with the diagram and a verbal description.But I cannot produce a diagram without knowing what is happening. I have, also in my mind, the possibility of starting with the airborn, without an ob involved, if this would result in more velocity to kick in the other balls. He has really been encouraging me to do this, also. A real nice guy.
The difficulty in the shot comes in:
1) Accurately predicting kick angles, which would have to be very thin cuts, so that little energy is imparted to the pocketed balls, enabling the cb to continue around multiple rails. Not nearly as many rails as the 11 rail one, but more difficult because of the accuracy of the kicks required by the TSA.
2) The other part of the difficulty is being able to put the airborne ob on the cushion at a specified angle and with sufficient force, which would theoretically be able to give it enough velocity to kick in the other shot(s),at the desired angles and go a specified number of rails, also based on what is posible by the laws of physics, determined by the amount of velocity which can be obtained from that airborne hit on the cb.
Now, I am not experienced enough that I jump obstructing balls. This is not something I have even attempted because I am currently working on shape. Also, it is of greater desire to me, to master multiple rail kicks,banks,masses before jumping over balls. I have been able to kick around an obstructing ball, however, on some occasions, by doing a slight variation,but the cb is not to the naked eye airborne, where a normal kick would not have been able to strike that ball. In those cases, sufficient kick angle could not be produced to strike the desired ball, due to the proximity of the balls to the rail and to each other, so curve resulted in a kick, which appeared to be otherwize impossible. Some might say in those cases, that perhaps it is a masse kick, but without knowing when a ball is a curve, at what point it becomes masse and so forth, it was kind of a feel kind of thing and consequently one which I cannot define.
So, I need some physics to explain, first, what is producing the initial effect on the airborne cueball.
Thanks in advance.
Laura
Now, this is where this idea came from and one of the difficulties I am having is determining what is happening in terms of physics/spin to that air borne cb. I had been doing a shot, mostly for fun, in which an ob was near a corner pocket, and could be easily pocketed with regular spin, but with, consequently after striking the cb, being only a few inches from the adjacent long rail, and what appeared to be a small angle of incidence. So in this shot, I hit the cb hard, with a nearly vertical downward strike, with a very small amount of inside. Then when the ball went airborne, it struck and pocketed the ob, and created a larger angle into the cushion than would normally be obtained with regular spin and then ran down the length of the table for a strike on the opposite end rail. So, not only was the angle increased, but so was the velocity. Now I am not sure where in this airborne strike the ob was hit, but it definitely hit the cushion airborn. I have speculated that the ob is hit at the beginning of the airborn arc, hitting the cushion on the downward arc, but again, not knowing for sure if this is what is happening.
So to be able to predict its action onto the other rails, I need to know what such a hit is DOING to the cb, to create such an effect. And, of course, I need to know the physics of that shot, and what velocity can be created to see if the rest of the shot is scientifically posible.
I have been emailing with Tom Rossman, who right off the bat agreed to look at the shot,and determine if it can be done, once I can provide him with the diagram and a verbal description.But I cannot produce a diagram without knowing what is happening. I have, also in my mind, the possibility of starting with the airborn, without an ob involved, if this would result in more velocity to kick in the other balls. He has really been encouraging me to do this, also. A real nice guy.
The difficulty in the shot comes in:
1) Accurately predicting kick angles, which would have to be very thin cuts, so that little energy is imparted to the pocketed balls, enabling the cb to continue around multiple rails. Not nearly as many rails as the 11 rail one, but more difficult because of the accuracy of the kicks required by the TSA.
2) The other part of the difficulty is being able to put the airborne ob on the cushion at a specified angle and with sufficient force, which would theoretically be able to give it enough velocity to kick in the other shot(s),at the desired angles and go a specified number of rails, also based on what is posible by the laws of physics, determined by the amount of velocity which can be obtained from that airborne hit on the cb.
Now, I am not experienced enough that I jump obstructing balls. This is not something I have even attempted because I am currently working on shape. Also, it is of greater desire to me, to master multiple rail kicks,banks,masses before jumping over balls. I have been able to kick around an obstructing ball, however, on some occasions, by doing a slight variation,but the cb is not to the naked eye airborne, where a normal kick would not have been able to strike that ball. In those cases, sufficient kick angle could not be produced to strike the desired ball, due to the proximity of the balls to the rail and to each other, so curve resulted in a kick, which appeared to be otherwize impossible. Some might say in those cases, that perhaps it is a masse kick, but without knowing when a ball is a curve, at what point it becomes masse and so forth, it was kind of a feel kind of thing and consequently one which I cannot define.
So, I need some physics to explain, first, what is producing the initial effect on the airborne cueball.
Thanks in advance.
Laura