UPA's Position on Danny Harriman's Issues

Blackjack

Illuminati Blacksmack
Silver Member
As many of you have read in some of the posts, Danny Harriman has gone public with his issues regarding money owed him for past tournaments sanctioned by the UPA. Danny's statements were brought up by himself publicly. Danny has contended that the money is owed him, yet the UPA has done nothing to assist him in getting paid. Danny also has said publicly that the UPA have been hounding him for his $100 membership fee, and that he had a verbal altercation with UPA Rep Frank Alvarez prior to his match with Corey Deuel at the Bicycle Club. Danny Harriman forfeited his match when he broke down his cue and left during mid-match. Danny addressed this issue publicly last week and responded to questions and thanked people for supporting him. I offered to work with Danny, the UPA, and Brady Behrman to come to a viable solution that would bring back a great player to the professional game. I publicly and privately offered to work on Danny's behalf to try to correct this situation. I have even offered to pay Danny's entry fee into the next UPA event in Jacksonville in an attempt to mend fences between Danny and Frank Alvarez. I have spoken to the parties involved,including Frank Alvarez & Brady Behrman. I have publicy and privately asked Danny to contact me to discuss a solution to this matter. Danny has yet to contact me regarding this situation, so I can only go by what he has posted here in regards to this issue.

I would like to say that the people I have talked to were very open about this issue. My reason for doing this was to try to bridge a gap between the UPA, the promoter, and the player. It is a very easy, workable solution which will work out for everybody. My goal is to ensure that Danny gets paid what he is due. Many have gravitated towards Danny's side in the issue, which is great, we should support the player. I'm not on Danny's side, I'm not on The UPA's side, or Brady's... I'm on pool's side. We need to address these issues and correct them much more efficiently than we have in the past, and hopefully we can learn from this incident. It is important, however, that we understand that we have only heard Danny's side of this issue.

In speaking with UPA Representative Frank Alvarez I found him very honest, open, and willing to resolve this issue. I can honestly say that I believe that Frank Alvarez, working on behalf of the UPA, has done everything in his power to resolve this issue with Danny Harriman. If anyone doesn't believe that, ask Frank. He will take your calls, he will answer questions, and I respect him greatly for that.

Danny Harriman Forfeits against Corey Deuel

Danny has said publicly that he did this in order to protest his issues with Frank Alvarez about the $100 membership fee the UPA requires. Though this may be partially the case, it is not the entire story of what happened prior to Danny forfeiting his match. Corey had played safe, Danny had no shot and he basically just fired at the cue ball. Someone in the crowd laughed, Danny didn't like it, and he decided that he had enough stress for one day.

The issue with Danny Harriman's UPA membership was not a new issue. Acording to the UPA, Danny had been represented as a UPA member
because of the monies owed to him - no other reason. Danny Harriman had been asked to take care of it in the past, and had refused to do so. Danny was represented and treated just as if he had paid that membership fee, a fact that he has not brought up. He enjoyed all of the perks that come with UPA membership (seeding, representation) yet he had not paid a dime for it. Apparantly, Tony Robles had also brought this issue to Danny Harriman, as well as Frank Alvarez. Frank Alvarez's version of what happened and why is much different than what has been portrayed in the other threads. Without going into who is telling the truth, and who is not telling the truth, it is safe to say that there was a communication breakdown between Frank Alvarez and Danny Harriman at the Bicycle Club event. Words were exchanged, and a line was drawn in the sand. Without getting into that, I will explain the issues that have already been discussed, and I will try add some clarity to the events.

Monies owed Danny Harriman by Brady Behrman

For problems beyond Brady Behrman's control, he came up approximately $10K short for the event in question. He owed other players money besides Danny. Danny had made this a major issue with the UPA. The UPA worked on Danny's behalf to ensure that Brady would pay Danny Harriman the $2000 that was owed him. According to Brady, he paid Danny Harriman with two $500 money orders. According to Brady, he sent Danny Harriman a PM on this site to ask why he was saying that he never paid him. According to Brady, he owes Danny approximately $800. Brady has publicly and privately acknowledged this debt and has every intention of paying what he owes. It is also important to note that Brady owes other players money, and to my knowledge, I think Danny is the only one close to being paid the enitre amount owed, yet he has been the most vocal in his dissatisfaction.

The UPA was not at fault during this issue. Some fault can be pushed Brady Behrman's way, but understand he can't pay what he doesn't have. He has made every effort to publicly acknowledge several issues where he owes money in relation to several difficulties he has experienced. In every instance, Brady has acknowledge and admitted fault, regret, and a solution to pay what he owes. That's not easy to do provately, nevermind doing it publicly as he has done in this forum and many others. Because of what happened with Brady Behrman's event, The UPA have since changed their policies when dealing with promoters, the specifics of these changes can be found at their web site ( www.upatour.org ). The UPA took it upon themselves to help a non-member (Danny Harriman) and on Danny's behalf worked tirelessly to assist him. In return, they had asked Danny to pay the UPA membership fee, seeing he was enjoying all the benefits of being a UPA member. Danny refused to pay in response to monies owed him by Brady Behrman (according to his own post). At this point it was clear to the UPA that he was using ths issue as a bargaining tool. If Danny Harriman wanted the UPA to assist him in this issue, their is a fee for that. Legal representation costs a lot more than $100, and that is basically what the UPA was doing on Danny Harriman's behalf - for FREE. Danny Harrimn was approached by the UPA at their players meeting in January, and Danny said he would take care of the membership fee but failed to do so. By the time Frank Alvarez confronted Danny Harriman at the Bicycle Club event, it had become an issue with other players that had paid their membership fee. For forfeiting his match, Danny would be barred from competing in the next UPA event. Danny's forfeit was a disppointment to all of his supporting fans, as well as Corey Deuel's fans.

There was a phone conversation between Farnk Alvarez and Danny Harriman in which Danny Harriman basically said he was through with the UPA and he no longer wanted to talk with Frank Alvarez. This is the last correspondence the UPA has had with Danny Harriman.

Monies owed Danny Harriman by Bin Min
According to Danny Harriman's own admission, he waited "A couple of months" before trying to deposit the check. Most checks are good for only 90 days, which was probably the case with the check he recieved from that event. According o Dannys post, he admittedly says he is "unorganized" and lost the copy of the check that bank mailed him. This is not the UPA's fault, and it's not Bin Min's fault at all. When asked to produce the original check, Danny says he sent a copy which Mr. Min did not accept as the original. Mr. Min has no problems paying Danny Harriman the money once the original check is recieved. This is not "the whammy" as Danny Harriman referred to it. This is a business man that requires proof that money is owed before he pays you. The reason for this is: If you waited past the date of the check being valid, he doesn't owe Danny a red cent. Where The irresponsibility or Danny Harriman's admitted "unorganization" becomes the UPA's problem is not clear; yet Frank Alvarez went to bat on behalf of Danny Harriman to make sure he would receive his money. It's a safe bet that if he does not have the original, he won't be receiving money from Bin Min, and its not Mr. Min's fault, or the UPA's. It's Danny Harriman's fault for not depositing the check in a reasonably timely fashion.

In response to Danny's situation, I made an offer with Danny so that we could try to sit all parties down to come to a solution. In doing so, I talked to several people and I am still willing to do that. A player of Danny's ability should play with the best players in the world. In putting personal differences aside and coming to a solution , the following needs to occur.

1) Danny you need to contact me. My offer still stands. I will pay your entry fee to the Jacksonville event and your $100 UPA membership fee - to make this right - no strings attached. In return, you will be an active UPA member and receive all the benefits that come along with that - including tour points
seedings, and representation. All I am asking is that we sit down and handle this as adults.

2) Brady must pay Danny the remainder of what he is owed. Brady says its $800. Danny says he was never paid a dime, yet Frank Alvarez confirmed that Brady has made payments to Danny Harriman. Brady Behrman attempted to contact Danny privately to ask why Danny is saying he hasn't recieved money from him. Danny, you never replied to Brady Behrman.

In closing, I would like to let Danny Harriman know that all of us want this situation corrected. Nobody I have talked to is against Danny Harriman. In speaking with the UPA, there are several ways that this situation will be avoided with in the future. There have also been talks between myself and several tour directors about having an entity set up for the players to use in situations such as this. This would keep situations like this from getting out of hand. It is safe to say Danny that is a very good possibility that the money owed to you can be in your bank account by the end of this week - if you'd just pick up the phone and talk. It's great that everybody is behind you
during your misfortunes, but they also need to know the other side of the story. In situations such as this, it can be very easy to get caught up in a popularity contest instead of what the facts are. I hope that doesn't end up being the case here. The ball is in Danny's court. If he wants a solution, he'll contact me, Frank, or Brady to discuss this issue and resolve it once and for all. Either way, Danny, you win. Feel free to contact me anytime at
(386) 208-0011.
 
Blackjack,.... That's a lot of information to digest. Thanks for stepping up to bat on this. You're a scholar and a gentleman. Once again you've gone way above and beyond the call of duty.
 
Just a question

Can we assume Barry has copies of the money orders he sent Danny?
You are suppose to enter payee on m.o. before leaving the counter.
 
Issues ...

I, personally, know Danny, and have played in a few Midwest 9 ball tour events with him in the past. I found him to be a very nice person, very congenial, and a person with no quirky personality traits or rude in any way. He is a very good Pool player, and a good sport.

Most Pool players always need money, so I find it hard to believe that a check, if received, would not be deposited in a timely manner.

There are state laws governing how long a check must be good for, most fall into the category of 180 days, not 90. I was Payroll supervisor for 5 years for Learjet when they had over 5,000 employess so I familiar with the Payroll laws and regulations. During that time, we had a Supervisor that had payroll checks that were over 3 years old that had not been deposited since he had other sources of income. Even though the original checks were past the 180 days of being good, we cancelled the original checks (3 of them), and reissued new checks to replace the originals. You see, he still did the work for which he was owed to by the company, he was a trusted and long standing employee, and that took precedence over the expiration date of the original checks.

It is kind of like if someone commits a foul in Pool, and you did not see it. Some would say it is your fault, and some would own up to the foul, and give you ball in hand, which you would deserve.

If you truly want to promote goodwill and a sense of fairness, the UPA should cancel what they say was the original checks after verifying they had not been cashed to date, and reissue the check plus pay Danny what is owed to him. That would be the right thing to do, and would go a long way towards making amends.
 
Blackjack, someone should make you the President of Pool. If more players, promoters, and room owners were as reasonable as you we could make some progess marketing our sport. The az forum is made better by your contributions, and it looks like Danny Harriman's wallet will be made a bit bigger as well.
 
nfty9er said:
Can we assume Barry has copies of the money orders he sent Danny?
You are suppose to enter payee on m.o. before leaving the counter.

Brady, not Barry. Barry promotes the US Open every year. Brady is his son.

That's beside the point anyway. The beef here is that Danny is bitching that the UPA isn't doing anything for him to get money he didn't receive from Brady. Since Danny never paid his UPA dues, the UPA isn't obligated to do so. The UPA has, though, worked on Danny's behalf anyway to try to get the money owed him, even though Danny has never paid his UPA dues, and therefore is entitled to ZERO representation from the UPA.

I can kinda see things from both sides. Danny thinks the UPA should represent him better in order to get his money, the UPA thinks Danny should pay his dues in order to receive that particular benefit. Regardless of the outcome, all I can say is that pool needs more Blackjacks around.

-djb
 
Coop1701 said:
Blackjack,.... That's a lot of information to digest. Thanks for stepping up to bat on this. You're a scholar and a gentleman. Once again you've gone way above and beyond the call of duty.

I agree, another very generous offer, even more generous than Mike's guarantee of $500 profit to teacherman which he refused! Sorry, couldn't resist....

Anyway, I just want to mention that people who are not familiar with the board, and I know Danny is a new poster, may not notice if they've been PM'd. But now he should know. Once I didn't see a PM in my box for about 3 weeks. I never think of looking in the upper right corner...
 
I agree

DoomCue said:
Brady, not Barry. Barry promotes the US Open every year. Brady is his son.

That's beside the point anyway. The beef here is that Danny is bitching that the UPA isn't doing anything for him to get money he didn't receive from Brady. Since Danny never paid his UPA dues, the UPA isn't obligated to do so. The UPA has, though, worked on Danny's behalf anyway to try to get the money owed him, even though Danny has never paid his UPA dues, and therefore is entitled to ZERO representation from the UPA.

I can kinda see things from both sides. Danny thinks the UPA should represent him better in order to get his money, the UPA thinks Danny should pay his dues in order to receive that particular benefit. Regardless of the outcome, all I can say is that pool needs more Blackjacks around.

-djb

I mis spoke on name. I was just making point if they want proof from Danny with a copy of check I imagine the converse is appropriate that Brady show proof he paid Danny with his copy of the money orders.
Also I am confused not really disputing or disagreeing here, but usually original checks are always sent back to the originator not the recepient unless of course Danny never deposited the check because it was so old.
Either way it is great to see someone working for the betterment of pool.
 
[QUOTE.The reason for this is: If you waited past the date of the check being valid, he doesn't owe Danny a red cent.
[/QUOTE]

Gimme a break!

Sounds like if you give me the called seven, and i forget to call it on a hanger, your gonna tell me "no good you didnt call it"

Is that the way you see things? Why doesnt Ben Min stop payment on the original check, deduct the 'stop payment fee' and send Danny another check? Matter settled instantly!

If true that Danny waited months to deposit a check from a POOL EVENT, that is just about the dumbest thing I've heard lately though. I know one guy who stayed an extra day at the US open just so he could be at Barry's bank Monday morning.

I hope u can help get this settled though BJ, but it's pretty clear whose side you are on.
 
Last edited:
Blackjack said:
I offered to work with Danny, the UPA, and Brady Behrman to come to a viable solution that would bring back a great player to the professional game. I publicly and privately offered to work on Danny's behalf to try to correct this situation. I have even offered to pay Danny's entry fee into the next UPA event in Jacksonville in an attempt to mend fences between Danny and Frank Alvarez. I have spoken to the parties involved,including Frank Alvarez & Brady Behrman. I have publicy and privately asked Danny to contact me to discuss a solution to this matter. Danny has yet to contact me regarding this situation, so I can only go by what he has posted here in regards to this issue.

You deserve kudos for going over and beyond the call of duty to rectify this matter. We all applaud you for your willingness to handle this in such a positive manner.

Blackjack said:
I would like to say that the people I have talked to were very open about this issue. My reason for doing this was to try to bridge a gap between the UPA, the promoter, and the player. It is a very easy, workable solution which will work out for everybody. My goal is to ensure that Danny gets paid what he is due... I'm not on Danny's side, I'm not on The UPA's side, or Brady's... I'm on pool's side. We need to address these issues and correct them much more efficiently than we have in the past, and hopefully we can learn from this incident.
Agreed.

Blackjack said:
Danny Harriman Forfeits against Corey Deuel

Danny has said publicly that he did this in order to protest his issues with Frank Alvarez about the $100 membership fee the UPA requires.
It's in very bad taste when an organization is unable to pay its members, what they're due. Yet they still expect to receive money from the member.

When the original party receives what it's due, then that party would be willing to pay the other party what it's due.

The membership fee is paid in advance, and is basically a contractual agreement between the two parties for the following year. During that time frame, if the UPA was unable to deliver on the monies that were due to its members (including Danny), then they are basically in breech of contract.

It's a bit ludicrous to expect those members to re-up and pay the next year's fee, when that organization is proven to be unable to fulfill on its obligations.

If you have an extended warranty on your car, and then when your car finally breaks down, the company is unable to fulfill on the repairs, it would be stupid for you to pay for another warranty. That would be sending good money out with the bad.

That organization failed to fulfill on its monetary obligation. Makes no sense to give that organization more money.

Blackjack said:
Though this may be partially the case, it is not the entire story of what happened prior to Danny forfeiting his match. Corey had played safe, Danny had no shot and he basically just fired at the cue ball. Someone in the crowd laughed, Danny didn't like it, and he decided that he had enough stress for one day.
Assuming that all else is true - Danny wins, doesn't get paid by UPA, thus doesn't pay UPA next membership fee, UPA representative then has the gaul to come ask Danny for that membership fee... I wouldn't be surprised if it became very difficult for Danny to put forth his full forth effort and concentration necessary to play in that tournament against Corey Duel. Note, I understand that a champion poolplayer has to be able to rise up and overcome mental distractions. Just saying, that I wouldn't blame Danny if he didn't have his heart in that tournament, being a bit on tilt from not getting paid, and could potentially win and not get paid for that tournament as well. Not saying that any of this is true, only Danny could say for sure... Just saying what would be an obvious presumption.

Blackjack said:
The issue with Danny Harriman's UPA membership was not a new issue. Acording to the UPA, Danny had been represented as a UPA member
because of the monies owed to him - no other reason. Danny Harriman had been asked to take care of it in the past, and had refused to do so. Danny was represented and treated just as if he had paid that membership fee, a fact that he has not brought up. He enjoyed all of the perks that come with UPA membership (seeding, representation) yet he had not paid a dime for it. Apparantly, Tony Robles had also brought this issue to Danny Harriman, as well as Frank Alvarez. Frank Alvarez's version of what happened and why is much different than what has been portrayed in the other threads. Without going into who is telling the truth, and who is not telling the truth, it is safe to say that there was a communication breakdown between Frank Alvarez and Danny Harriman at the Bicycle Club event. Words were exchanged, and a line was drawn in the sand. Without getting into that, I will explain the issues that have already been discussed, and I will try add some clarity to the events.

Monies owed Danny Harriman by Brady Behrman

For problems beyond Brady Behrman's control, he came up approximately $10K short for the event in question. He owed other players money besides Danny.
Problems beyond Brady Behrman's control??? Obviously vague... but clearly you're trying to let him off the hook too easily.

Even if the sentence were simply rephrased to remove the opinion and just state the fact - Brady Behrman came up approximately $10K short for the event in question. That would be simply accurate and to the point without any leaning to one side or the other...

Blackjack said:
Danny had made this a major issue with the UPA. The UPA worked on Danny's behalf to ensure that Brady would pay Danny Harriman the $2000 that was owed him.
According to Brady, he paid Danny Harriman with two $500 money orders.
Unless I'm doing some old fashioned math, two $500 money orders does not add up to $2000.

Blackjack said:
According to Brady, he sent Danny Harriman a PM on this site to ask why he was saying that he never paid him. According to Brady, he owes Danny approximately $800. Brady has publicly and privately acknowledged this debt and has every intention of paying what he owes. It is also important to note that Brady owes other players money, and to my knowledge, I think Danny is the only one close to being paid the enitre amount owed, yet he has been the most vocal in his dissatisfaction.
For whatever reasons that Brady was unable to pay originally. We can give respect and allowances for him and his willingness to rectify the situation without trying to cover up and do some spin job. At least his business has accurate enough accounting practices to know exactly what is owed. That demonstrates a true willingness on his part to rectify a wrong to restore credibility. As opposed to trying to sleaze out of it, only covering their own bottom line.

Could continue and say alot more... But the original message was long enough.. and my response is making it even longer....

But it conveys the essence....

Maybe will pick up the rest at some later time....

As a final note, if there is a genuine and honest attempt by the other party to rectify the wrongs, then Danny, might you ease up a bit. Try to salvage the best of the situation and let bygones be bygones. For the good of the professional pool community and everyone involved.

And UPA stand behind your work.... get your membership fees from the recovery of money for Danny and others. You're not entitled to your 100% until he gets his.
 
Nostroke said:
[QUOTE.The reason for this is: If you waited past the date of the check being valid, he doesn't owe Danny a red cent.

Gimme a break!

Sounds like if you give me the called seven, and i forget to call it on a hanger, your gonna tell me "no good you didnt call it"

Is that the way you see things? Why doesnt Ben Min stop payment on the original check, deduct the 'stop payment fee' and send Danny another check? Matter settled instantly!

If true that Danny waited months to deposit a check from a POOL EVENT, that is just about the dumbest thing I've heard lately though. I know one guy who stayed an extra day at the US open just so he could be at Barry's bank Monday morning.

I hope u can help get this settled though BJ, but it's pretty clear whose side you are on.[/QUOTE]



Howdy,
Now let us hear what SJM ,the master of Diplomacy,got to say.
Vagabond
 
Snapshot9 said:
I,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
If you truly want to promote goodwill and a sense of fairness, the UPA should cancel what they say was the original checks after verifying they had not been cashed to date, and reissue the check plus pay Danny what is owed to him. That would be the right thing to do, and would go a long way towards making amends.

that's EXACTLY what i was thinking. if someone neglects to cash a check, you don't say "tough luck, time's run out".

blackjack is trying to show he's fairminded but it's seems one sided to me. he only got one side of the story since danny never contacted him,,,and more than that, did not get a feel for danny's emotional input.
 
Last edited:
Nostroke said:
[QUOTE.The reason for this is: If you waited past the date of the check being valid, he doesn't owe Danny a red cent.


Gimme a break!

Sounds like if you give me the called seven, and i forget to call it on a hanger, your gonna tell me "no good you didnt call it"

Is that the way you see things? Why doesnt Ben Min stop payment on the original check, deduct the 'stop payment fee' and send Danny another check? Matter settled instantly!

If true that Danny waited months to deposit a check from a POOL EVENT, that is just about the dumbest thing I've heard lately though. I know one guy who stayed an extra day at the US open just so he could be at Barry's bank Monday morning.

I hope u can help get this settled though BJ, but it's pretty clear whose side you are on.

I'm not sure what you mean by me choosing sides. I think I was pretty clear that I was on "pool's" side. The inconsistencies in what Danny said in several of the posts had to be addressed and pointed out because the information I provided was verified. If it seems as if I chose a side in any of this, then you are reading too much into this. In the instance of the check given to Danny from Bin Min, Danny admittedly held on to it longer than usual. Danny said something about the account being closed, or the check not accepted. Either way, Mr. Min asked for the original copy of the check, which he needed to justify writing a new one. Until Danny comes up with the original, it's basically his loss. It becomes an issue between Danny and Bin Min, not the UPA. Danny was paid with the original check. Danny himself said in his post that he was very "unorganized" and he misplaced the letter from the bank (or the returned check). This is not the UPA's fault at all. It's not Bin Min's fault either. It's Danny's for waiting as long as he did. If Danny cannot come up with the original, then he learned a $400 lesson entitled Punctual Check Deposit 101.
 
bruin70 said:
that's EXACTLY what i was thinking. if someone neglects to cash a check, you don't say "tough luck, time's run out".

blackjack is trying to show he's fairminded but it's seems one sided to me. he only got one side of the story since danny never contacted him,,,and more than that, did not get a feel for danny's emotional input.


Not one sided at all. Danny received a check. Aparantly the check was either old, or not accepted because the account was not active any more ( unsure as to which) nonetheless, if Danny had deposited or cashed the check immediately, we wouldn't be talking about this. The line between "take care of me UPA" and what is "Danny Harriman's personal responsibility" has been crossed in this situation. It's unfortunate, but Danny must take responsibility for that check sitting around for so long - not Frank Alvarez, Bin Min, or Brady Behrman. Staying focused on the solution to the original problem, all parties must be willing to correct the situation. Fussing, arguing and pointing fingers will get all of them nowhere. My solution, is lets get the man paid, and lets get him back at the table. Everything else is secondary to that.
 
Blackjack said:
I'm not sure what you mean by me choosing sides. I think I was pretty clear that I was on "pool's" side. The inconsistencies in what Danny said in several of the posts had to be addressed and pointed out because the information I provided was verified. If it seems as if I chose a side in any of this, then you are reading too much into this. In the instance of the check given to Danny from Bin Min, Danny admittedly held on to it longer than usual. Danny said something about the account being closed, or the check not accepted. Either way, Mr. Min asked for the original copy of the check, which he needed to justify writing a new one. Until Danny comes up with the original, it's basically his loss. It becomes an issue between Danny and Bin Min, not the UPA. Danny was paid with the original check. Danny himself said in his post that he was very "unorganized" and he misplaced the letter from the bank (or the returned check). This is not the UPA's fault at all. It's not Bin Min's fault either. It's Danny's for waiting as long as he did. If Danny cannot come up with the original, then he learned a $400 lesson entitled Punctual Check Deposit 101.

So, Let me get this straight..................I write a check to someone--I deduct the amount from my account--then if they don't cash it--I GET TO PUT IT BACK IN MY ACCOUNT????? PLEASE

There is only one solution:

(1) As someone stated, Bin Min stops payment on his check, deducts the fee from the NEW check he writes.

(2) Brady pays what he owes.

(3) Then Danny can pay his UPA membership...If he chooses to remain a member.


If you want to help him why don't you get this done for him. All it looks like, is deadbeats trying NOT to pay, all they have to do is give him his money.

One guy (Bin Min) trying to get out of it saying give me the original check....its not possible so stop the payment and deduct it and give another one or cash with a receipt.

One guy (Brady Berman) trying to get out of it saying "I only owe $800 not $2000". WELL....GIVE HIM $800 AND FIGHT ABOUT THE REST.


Anything other than the above proves that they are just deadbeats.
 
Blackjack said:
Not one sided at all. Danny received a check. Aparantly the check was either old, or not accepted because the account was not active any more ( unsure as to which) nonetheless, if Danny had deposited or cashed the check immediately, we wouldn't be talking about this. The line between "take care of me UPA" and what is "Danny Harriman's personal responsibility" has been crossed in this situation. It's unfortunate, but Danny must take responsibility for that check sitting around for so long - not Frank Alvarez, Bin Min, or Brady Behrman. Staying focused on the solution to the original problem, all parties must be willing to correct the situation. Fussing, arguing and pointing fingers will get all of them nowhere. My solution, is lets get the man paid, and lets get him back at the table. Everything else is secondary to that.

Good job so far on your part Blackjack. Hopefully Harriman is willing to cooperate to resolve all issues. You may want to talk to Bin Min again and have him cancel the earlier check and write a new one minus the fees for the cancelled check. This would be the right thing to do and I have done this many times in business. It is wrong to say Bin Min has no responsibility, he has $400 more than he should and Danny has $400 less than he should.
The other parts it sounds like everyone is willing to work things out if Harriman cooperates, and maybe Danny will owe a few apologies for painting false pictures.

Wayne
 
First, lets open by saying "well done" to Blackjack. His detective work in this matter is what's called a labor of love, and he has helped to frame the issues surrounding this unfortunate affair. While it's clear from this thread that some feel Blackjack has investigatived and filed his report with a slight bias, let's all recognize that presenting this situation in a perfectly objective way would be near impossible. It should be clear to all of us that Blackjack is trying to further a very noble cause called "reconciliation," a cause we all believe in. I know this because, through our posts, we on the forum have shown that, we too, believe that the resumption of Danny Harriman's fullest participation in professional pool is good for the game.

So what's my opinion? Mine is that those prompted to action by Blackjack take the steps he suggests. Blackjack has offered the facts and , more importantly, the roadmap to reconciliation, here. Reconciliation is, regrettably, the road less traveled all too often in professional pool disputes, but all parties involved can do themselves proud by stepping up to the plate to bring this unfortunate incident to a close, and thereby facilitate the reactivation of a pro pool career in which we all see a lot of promise.

Thanks, Blackjack, for trying to be an ambassador for professional pool here.
 
Last edited:
FLICKit said:
Assuming that all else is true - Danny wins, doesn't get paid by UPA, thus doesn't pay UPA next membership fee, UPA representative then has the gaul to come ask Danny for that membership fee...

Uhh the UPA was not the one who didn't pay Danny, it was Brady Behrman. Now it turns out that what Danny has said about not being paid is not true either, he was paid by Bin Min but never cashed the check. He has been paid a large part of what he is owed by Brady. Unfortunately, it appears that Harriman has been altering the truth (unless everyone else is lying which seem very unlikely)


Problems beyond Brady Behrman's control??? Obviously vague... but clearly you're trying to let him off the hook too easily.

Even if the sentence were simply rephrased to remove the opinion and just state the fact - Brady Behrman came up approximately $10K short for the event in question. That would be simply accurate and to the point without any leaning to one side or the other...

This has been covered a number of times previously, an Ice Storm hit the east coast, the event took a beating and Brady couldn't cover his losses at the time, but it sounds like he is and intends to make good on it.

Wayne
 
Ya know...

I don't have a dog in this fight, but here is what my morals would have me do.

Number 1, I would not worry about the four hundred bucks. That should be peanuts to a player like Danny Harriman...hell I have lost more than that in 4 hands of blackjack.

Number 2, the situation where the guy did not pay him, if that was indeed due to inclimate weather, I would be a gentleman and tell him to settle up with me whenever he could...let that be on his conscious and not mine. Knowing my focus is on my pool game and not on whose playing me or paying me, I would not be concerned about being paid due to circumstances beyond my control. Last time I checked I am not mother nature.

Be a gentleman Danny, that's what this sport needs.

That's just me...and I also commend Blackjack for trying to get these people through this difficult situation.

Take it for what it's worth...about a penny,
Shorty
 
Back
Top