Hello everyone!
Where I live there are not many top pros really - maybe a couple 700-730 Fargo players. One of them is my coach and he has a lot of ball knowledge, certainly and he has helped me improve immensely.
BUT:
I tend to question some of his "demands" from time to time about certain technical things.
He says there are basically 4 spots where you are supposed to hit the cue ball: Follow (top of the cue ball); stun follow; stun draw; draw (lowest point of the cue ball). The in-between spots are non-existent according to him - like let's say a bit of draw but not really the lowest part of the cue ball but maybe a half a tip above it.
Do you agree? Do you think that with the correct technique this 4 spots are sufficient for a perfect position play? (disregarding the side-spin, which is a completely different dimension of it all)?
Where I live there are not many top pros really - maybe a couple 700-730 Fargo players. One of them is my coach and he has a lot of ball knowledge, certainly and he has helped me improve immensely.
BUT:
I tend to question some of his "demands" from time to time about certain technical things.
He says there are basically 4 spots where you are supposed to hit the cue ball: Follow (top of the cue ball); stun follow; stun draw; draw (lowest point of the cue ball). The in-between spots are non-existent according to him - like let's say a bit of draw but not really the lowest part of the cue ball but maybe a half a tip above it.
Do you agree? Do you think that with the correct technique this 4 spots are sufficient for a perfect position play? (disregarding the side-spin, which is a completely different dimension of it all)?