Value of a Cue?

duke@neo.rr.com said:
tap, tap, tap! nicely said, I agree with you!
jeff <<add me to your list of people who can't stand Jimbo

LOL one more guy who isn't good with the truth. I guess liars stick together.

Jim <---liar slayer
 
Bishop said:
Well I'm not going to post screen names from PMs I just won't. Nothing I can do one way or another to prove they are real. lol and that was just a few. I pretty much figured you'd respond that way. Basically you are calling me a liar and a fake so I guess you've resorted to name calling as well. Hooray. I take comfort in knowing a lot of people just don't respect the person that you are and the way you conduct yourself dispite who you know.

My simple point in the most neanderthal way I can put it is that you don't talk down or create a negative vibe in someones for sale thread. You fail to get this time and time again. Really thats the whole arguement. You think its ok to open debate in the BST forum and you're wrong. Flat out wrong. Thats the main point, we can debate it, but you're wrong and most people think you're wrong.

You are wrong and you don't speak for most people, and I am in chat right now, so unless you plan to add to the thread just go there and call me names.

Jim
 
JimBo said:
LOL one more guy who sees my true colors.

Jim <---Pompous, arrogant, ignorant bafoon.
Fixed that for you!







I tried and then just couldn't resist lol
 
Last edited:
Bishop,

Seriously, how may hours did you stare at this thread today just waiting for it to change?

This is a whole new level to the term stalking.

Koop - not one of your private supporters.
 
Koop said:
Bishop,

Seriously, how may hours did you stare at this thread today just waiting for it to change?

This is a whole new level to the term stalking.

Koop - not one of your private supporters.

It's like a nasty car wreck..........you know it's going to be ugly but you still slow down to take a peek!

Should be working myself.............
 
Fortunately I have a job that allows me tons of interweb time.

lol Jimbo and I have something in common. Gotta love them Cowboys.
 
BarenbruggeCues said:
It's like a nasty car wreck..........you know it's going to be ugly but you still slow down to take a peek!

Should be working myself.............

why work? this is better than a car wreck! it's more like a huge pile-up. :)
 
skins said:
why work? this is better than a car wreck! it's more like a huge pile-up. :)

I know .........and the forum used to be such a nice place to come express ones heart warmed feelings and just enjoy the togetherness and companionship.
krunch...krunch....krunch......(eating popcorn)
Slurp...slurp...slurp....(drinking rootbeer)
Geez I hope I didn't hurt anyones feelings......................
Krunch.........slurp....
 
Okay!!

We've heard from other posters, and I will tell you why I stated my comments as such, because when I was trying to sell a Schon SP-35 with 3 certifications of it being such, I was lambasted by 3 or 4 posters calling me a liar, even though I had pictures of it from the 1980's as it being a SP-35. The owner also talked to the cuemaker himslef on more than one occasion. They were claiming it was another model number, which it was not. Both model numbers were in the Blue Book, and the other model was similiar, but did not possess the detail and quality of materials that my friend's cue had. Bob had the Blue Book and I saw both listings myself.

Those 3 or 4 people were not reprimanded or warned in any way, so that is why I have repeatedly asked if it was okay to challenge a price in the for sale/wanted section publicly. It enters into the area that many people are cue experts here, not in the making, but in their value on the market, and do they have an obligation to the populace of the board to say when they think something is out of line in the for sale/wanted section. And also, when you come on here, you are on an international basis, not just a regional basis like you are without the internet.

You mean I don't have the right, on a public international board, to say you are a little too proud of stick, IMO or I don't think any plain jane cue is worth a $1,000 or more. Anybody that makes a product adjusts their pricing by the feedback they get back from the public, or they end up with more inventory than they know what to do with. I have never made an outright negative comment in the for sale/wanted section, I just want it clarified as to whether it is acceptable or not, and if not, then why did I have to suffer the barrage of accusations and comments I did. And I won't even go into the 1st amendment thing.
 
Snapshot9 said:
I have no problem with cuemakers trying to sell their cues on here, BUT when they do, they become open to comments and questions about those products. THIS IS A PUBLIC BOARD, NOT THEIR PERSONAL WEBSITE. Besides, it doesn't matter where, if I was interested in a cue, but thought the price was too high, I would tell him that, on here, or to his face. And I am sure it would not be the first time they were told that either.


Bishop???

Bishop????

Where the hell is Bishop when the you need him?!?!?!

I mean, here it is, the one point that completely negates any and all of Bishop's arguments, spelled out by Snapshot in plain, easy-to-read language and yet somehow it seems to have missed him!!!!
 
Snapshot9 said:
. .

You mean I don't have the right, on a public international board, to say you are a little too proud of stick, IMO or I don't think any plain jane cue is worth a $1,000 or more. Anybody that makes a product adjusts their pricing by the feedback they get back from the public, or they end up with more inventory than they know what to do with. I have never made an outright negative comment in the for sale/wanted section, I just want it clarified as to whether it is acceptable or not, and if not, then why did I have to suffer the barrage of accusations and comments I did. And I won't even go into the 1st amendment thing.

As long as a BST forum exists discussion guidlines should remain as they are. This minimizes the creation of phantom/false markets.

If we eliminate the ability to question we should question if we want to maintain the ability to sell.

We might also question if the AZ site should be responsible for playing a significant role in someones livelihood. It seems like this has been a factor in some of the more emotionally charged situations.

Freedom to market/sell without checks/balances can lead to chaos.

The challange is finding a way to question without it leading to confrontation.
 
BarenbruggeCues said:
I know .........and the forum used to be such a nice place to come express ones heart warmed feelings and just enjoy the togetherness and companionship.
krunch...krunch....krunch......(eating popcorn)
Slurp...slurp...slurp....(drinking rootbeer)
Geez I hope I didn't hurt anyones feelings......................
Krunch.........slurp....

Dave aren't you one of those cuemakers who will not post here because of me, and aren't you one of the guys who PMed Bishop in the I hate JimBo fan club??? I've heard about all these cuemakers who are affraid to post here and who hate me, I'm just trying to meet a few.

Jim
 
JimBo said:
Dave aren't you one of those cuemakers who will not post here because of me, and aren't you one of the guys who PMed Bishop in the I hate JimBo fan club??? I've heard about all these cuemakers who are affraid to post here and who hate me, I'm just trying to meet a few.

Jim

Such a tyrant...........you scare the living hell out of me! I've seriously contemplated giving up posting, building and drinking. You've hurt my feelings terribly.
Jimbo........hate is such a dirty word!

I have to go shower now.
 
ribdoner said:
The challange is finding a way to question without it leading to confrontation.

I hope whom ever is able to do this will run for president next term also.

It would be an ideal world if it were possible........I just believe human nature won't allow it.
 
pharaoh68 said:
Bishop???

Bishop????

Where the hell is Bishop when the you need him?!?!?!

I mean, here it is, the one point that completely negates any and all of Bishop's arguments, spelled out by Snapshot in plain, easy-to-read language and yet somehow it seems to have missed him!!!!
Doesn't negate what was said. Had the forum listed discussion under its heading it might but it doesn't I don't disagree with that line at all. I think if a cue maker enters a thread like this one in this forum you have more of a right to your opinion here but not there. If you have to be a jerk there are appropriate places other than someones bst thread for it.

Although its not their personal website it is their personal sale thread. I understand the parameters of this place have not set clear guidelines as to proper conduct in someones sales thread, because common decency for a mans personal business should be respected and negative free. It should go without saying. Some here just don't have the common decency to understand that.

Do you go into someones small business shop and tell all the customers their not to buy his stuff because you thinks its overpriced. No, you'd get kicked out and in some cases you might get your tail whipped. Just because its a message board and not someones store front you don't have the right to be disrespectful of someone personal business.

Do you understand the difference, well I guess not. There are places here on this board for discussing the values of someones work, clearly the bst is not for that.

Jimbo I know you aren't totally in the dark bro. They PM'd me because they don't want a confrontation with you. Try real hard to put some deeper thought into it next time.
 
TellsItLikeItIs said:
You had no intent of buying that cue, at any price! Your only reason for commenting was for the attention you might receive. That's your style Jimbo, has been for years and probably always will be.

!

I thought you told it like it is??? I don't need attention if that were the case there are easy ways to do so on this forum. I was just pointing out the truth and as I've stated many times I was proven right in the end.
But I must add I feel you are doing a dis-service to the screen name, if you're going to name yourself that then at least try to be honest and consistant.
That being said was I wrong in anything I posted?? (Please tell it like it is)

Jim
 
Back
Top