3andstop said:I'm very happy to see these pool videos provided on line, but I'm also very curious as to why they seem to be playing these matches in the dark. Surely a digital camcorder can pick ambient light up better than this. Does anyone know why its so dark around the table?
champ2107 said:...fans of the game want to see run outs ...
Vinnie said:Not all fans. I personally think that it is very educational watching the pros deal with clusters and safeties. It gets pretty boring to watch pros running wide open racks all the time. I enjoyed the video.
Vinnie said:1. Are players allowed to purposefully rack the balls in a specific order?
champ2107 said:Watched it and that soft break was brutal!! in my opinion thats bs! breaking like that leaves me to believe cory feels he can not win strait up. Seems like its bit of legal sharking to me I would have been pissed off if I were larry. At tournament level they shouldnt allow that break, fans of the game want to see run outs.
In hockey the weaker teams play a system called the trap to try and give them selves a chance of beating the stronger teams, not fun to watch or play against. They have placed rules to try and stop it and make it a free flowing game that everyone likes to watch.
trustyrusty said:Was this in a tourney or a money game? Regardless, I couldn't care less what fans want to see. If there's a much better chance at winning playing this way, then do it. Your opponent has every right to do the same. I'd be much more interested (watching) to see how someone dealt with this tactic...than see runout after runout.
Why does Major League Baseball let those pitchers throw offspeed pitches and pitches that move 3 feet left to right, vice-versa, and up and down. I mean shouldn't the pitchers just have to throw it as hard as they can EVERYTIME to get the batter out? C'mon. If I knew someone COULDN'T hit a curveball, guess what I'm throwing him.
Complaining about a strategy that helps you win is like those in league who freak out if you play a lock-up saftey on them. Part of the game, and it should be.
trustyrusty said:Was this in a tourney or a money game? Regardless, I couldn't care less what fans want to see. If there's a much better chance at winning playing this way, then do it. Your opponent has every right to do the same. I'd be much more interested (watching) to see how someone dealt with this tactic...than see runout after runout.
Why does Major League Baseball let those pitchers throw offspeed pitches and pitches that move 3 feet left to right, vice-versa, and up and down. I mean shouldn't the pitchers just have to throw it as hard as they can EVERYTIME to get the batter out? C'mon. If I knew someone COULDN'T hit a curveball, guess what I'm throwing him.
Complaining about a strategy that helps you win is like those in league who freak out if you play a lock-up saftey on them. Part of the game, and it should be.
Most of that post was pretty retarded. JMHO.emf123 said:I got a very 'unfulfilled' feeling from watching that. They both played like crap, IMO. They should've given the prize money to a charity. I mean these are the two of the best players in the country, yet they both missed routine shots, Larry had a meltdown, and Corey broke like a pussy. I guess I just expect more, I actually like both players, especially Larry!
Imagine if Larry (or any top flight pro) had access to top flight sports psychologists and other modern training methods, like Olympic athletes do. You wouldn't see meltdowns like that and I think Americans would regain our stranglehold on this sport we all love. That is where we need to get to, IMO.
Eric
Neil said:Corey was out to win. He's playing a run-out player. What should his strategy be?? Hope your opponent doesn't run racks on you, or ensure that your opponent doesn't run racks on you. ??? Guess which is the right answer. Corey broke it down to a safety battle, where he figured to have the edge. Nevel wanted a runout game, and mentaly fell apart when he didn't get the chance for it.
Now, which one is the top player?? The one that used strategy, or the one that fell apart?? Nevel is great, but he has a few lessons to learn yet to be one of the top players. There's more to it than just pocketing balls.
DGunter said:Corey runs balls as good as anybody last I checked, but why do that when your sure your opponent will implode. Despite the fact that he did this the entire tournament, it was a good move to put the brakes on Nevel as he free-wheeled to 4-0. Funny video to boot.
champ2107 said:Cory is not a run out player? I would consider the top 100 (can I add a zero or two) players in the world to be run out players wouldnt you? You are right that he won!
So how I see your post is cory new he would get beat in a flat out evenly played race and needed to use strategy over skill to pull off the win. The strategy he used in my eyes was a form of legal sharking to through his opponent of his game. That was the first match I seen cory play since that ipt match, did he learn that break after that defeat? No disrespect to u Neil but I will debate this with u if u want in a respectful way![]()