StevenPWaldon said:Americans just don't want to watch pool. It's that simple.
They just dont know what they are watching, a friend(dosent play) said its just a bunch of balls going everywhere-i took him to the pool room one night and played a strong player, in the UK people KNOW what they are watching-even people who arnt players there understand whats going on, players obviously know more and can appericate some shots more so than nonplayers. Snooker is part of their culture, pool here in that respect died long ago.
I'm gonna catch some heat for this but I firmly believe snooker is a far better game for TV, the ebb and flow of it is better than 9,10 ball, or 14.1. The safety battles are better than on a 9' table as well. Also the rule that allows the player to have his opponent put the CB back to where it was laying if his opponent fouls for a second attempt at the same shot people like to watch that(the non players) because they get to watch a second attempt, players know how easy or hard it is so the 2nd chance thing isnt as important. Also the no-rail after a hit makes it simple for nonplayers to understand, I dont know why but people who dont play just dont understand why or what a rail after the hit means(they just dont get it), its vitaly important in 9' table games but not in snooker, just running the CB upto the stack and freezing it is an awesome shot.
All these reasons is why pool is suffering on TV here, the main reason is the cultural thing-pool is dead and the general public just dosent get it so they change the channel, I know I do unless the commentators are good like TAR-Acustats etc. I like Jimmy Wytch even some dont-he is really getting better and reads this forum so be nice!!!
Last edited: