What killed the slip stroke?

fels could play when younger and there were a lot that played like him or near his speed. names no one will ever hear again or remember.

there was a long list of no name players that would spot people that played decent, 50 or even 100 no count. and no one would win at that.
Never got that deep into the crowd. I'm still like that. Names and stories I've seen or heard and whatever comes out the cue. lol...
 
I was practicing this stroke about a year ago and I was really liking it. It only works if you are already accurate with tip position but is great for shots against the rail
 
I've been playing with a stroke slip since the late 80's. I don't know how, why, or when it started (it just came naturally) but I do remember two specific instances from decades ago where I didn't actually catch the cue and it slipped out of my hands on to the table - one was league night and one was a tournament. I haven't done that in a long time but once in a while I will notice my grip hand pinky-finger is no longer touching the cue and my ring finger is on the bumper and my fore and middle fingers are all that's holding the cue, that just happened the other day while banging some balls. Obviously, it's only used on shots that require a stronger stroke, drawing it 1", no slip, drawing it 4', depends on the table and conditions, drawing it 6-10 feet, absolutely using the stroke slip.

One thing I never see anyone mention is how the weight of the cue affects a stroke slip (i.e. toss). I shot with a 20oz (Huebler) cue for nearly 30 years, then moved to an 18.8oz (Ned Morris) cue for a couple of years, and sometime around 2020 I settled on a 17.7oz (Huebler) cue. From the late 80's until 2004 (I only played occasionally from 2004 until 2018) I bounced around between 9' and 7' tables but I didn't know then what I know now so never really noticed a difference, primarily because I had a heavy cue and it works on both big and small tables. Fast forward to 2020'sh and the only pool hall in my area with 9' tables had the absolute worst tables in the world so I stayed away from them and stuck with the 7 footers and I fell in love with my light cue and exclusively played on 7' tables for the next few years. Then, in 2024 I played on the new 9' Diamonds with my light cue and I couldn't play for shit and couldn't get any action on the cue. I tried a few different things but ultimately I pulled out my original 20oz Huebler and Voila - I was shooting lights out, just like my 17.7oz Huebler on a 7' table. I realized then how much the weight of the cue affects a stroke slip.

The key is, on a stroke slip, you are literally throwing the cue at the CB which means your grip, forearm, bicep, backstroke, have no affect on the cue once released, the only thing that matters is the speed of the cue when it leaves your hand (accuracy is another thing). The point at which you release the cue also matters, are you releasing it when your forearm is perfectly perpendicular to the stroke angle versus releasing slightly before or after that point, I honestly don't know when I release it nor am I going to pretend to know the difference. With the same stroke (i.e. all other things being equal), a 17.7oz cue has much less energy then a 20oz cue and therefore imparts much less energy on the CB which results in MUCH less draw/follow in my experience, I would easily come up 3' short on a really long draw shot using the light cue on a 9' table, heavy cue I was spot on. I actually went back and forth between the two cues to get a feel for it and it was revolutionary.

I rarely play on 9' tables but when I do I pull out the old heavy Huebler and put the shaft from the lighter Huebler on, in an attempt to keep deflection and tip feel/affect the same for consistency. Seems to work for me. Interested in hearing what others think.

I also find it ironic that someone mentioned Cortland Irish Linen (at least Irish linen) because other than my Ned Morris, which had a newer linen wrap, I have exclusively played with Cortland Irish linen with my Huebler's, original wraps from the 80's and 90's. The heavy Huebler is much more used and much dirtier but than the new one but they both have the same feel. The Ned Morris was perfect until I met up with Ned at his house and before he shipped it back to me he repressed it and when it arrived it was like glass and I simply hated it, no ill will towards Ned, he's a great guy and thought he was doing a good thing, but that ruined that cue for me and I sold it, that's when I moved the 17.7oz Huebler. I also have a post on here about installing a new wrap on a newer Huebler I recently purchased. It's a perfect wrap install but it's new linen and is too slippery, I literally want to go eat a dozen cheeseburgers and fries and play for days just to dirty the wrap so it feels better.

Regarding leather or other types of wraps, or no wraps. IMHO, there is no substitute for an Irish linen wrap, I've played with them for over 40 years and haven't found a better alternative yet. I did have an MVP tulip wood cue I enjoyed but it was bit too forward balanced for my liking but, it had an elephant ear wrap and it was the closest thing to my Cortland wraps. I have also played quite a bit with a 50+ year old bar cue with no wrap and the fact it's all beat up and has a dull finish seems to work but I have found newer bar cues with shiny finish will stick during the "slip" and won't play as accurately. I have also shot around with a few cues with "sport" wraps and those simply doesn't work with any type of slip stroke or stroke slip, work pretty good for breaking but that's about it.

And for reference:


The original (heavy) Huebler is #1 in this link, the new lighter Huebler is #3, the newer Huebler (which is heavier) is #2 in this link, the Ned Morris is #6, the bar cue is #8 (I have converted to a 2 piece and it's my current break cue), and the MVP cue is linked in post #1. An honorable mention is the Dzuricky I owned. I played an entire BCA session and took second in individual rankings, it played well, just not like the others I have mentioned.

i've read this correction before but always forget it. i don't see any use for a slip stroke of this definition whatsoever

I would tend to agree unless you're also using stroke slip. I can't imagine getting down on a ball and setting up the distance from tip to CB and then doing a backstroke and then moving your hand (same result as slip stroke) and then execute a forward stroke expecting to know exactly when the cue is going to hit the CB, just doesn't make sense. However, if you're using a stroke slip then you're at least releasing the cue prior to contact so as long as the backstroke and forward stroke apply the exact energy you're looking for then it might not be that big of a deal, either way, not for me.
 
Back
Top