CaptiveBred said:
My interpretation of Ken's post is-
The internet is a very cruel place... No telling when the machine will turn on you...
It's not a cruel place - it's a place where people get called out for the things they are accused of and a place where they get equal space and voice to defend themselves and acquit themselves if they can.
Time will tell if the internet will ever be a real force for positive change or whether it will simply become a place where millions jabber and no one takes action.
Nothing in the world is cheaper than a good idea with no action.
The UPA had a good idea. They however are either not capable or not willing to act on that idea.
Charlie Williams is a smart person. So is Frank Alvarez. I don't know what Charlie's official role is in the UPA right now but I assume he still has an active voice and some influence.
I don't even know what kind of organization the UPA has. Are they just a phone number? Do they have an office and a staff or is it just Frank?
I know from speaking with Ian Anderson, the president of the WPA, that their is mostly a volunteer organization with very little staff.
I have a lot of sympathy for anyone trying to better pool in this climate. You have many groups wanting to be "in control". You have a nebulous fan base. You have no clear path. You have a product that is constantly changed at the whims of the promoter/broadcaster. You have a product that is not considered a sport or even a worthwhile endeavor by 90%
of the world's population. Your product is also up against much more popular diversions like the National Spelling Bee.
What I don't however understand is WHY the people who want to make pool better only do it half-way? Why do they state such lofty goals and then fall so short of them. Why not state much less ambitious goals but ones which are attainable? Then attain them and move on to bigger things.
This is the time when everyone in the world is deluged with requests for their time and money. In order to stand out from the crowd one needs to be exceptional. The UPA will never get there if they approach these things halfway. If the professional player members of the UPA truly believe in their organization then they need to get out there and sell it and themselves in order to build the platform that they can depend on. And it cannot be done by 1 or 2 unpaid volunteers.
As much as I hate to use the IPT as an example I have to say that Trudeau was right about one thing - he did not receive the grassroots support of the IPT members in order to sell the world on the IPT. IF each IPT member had enlisted the circle of family and friends to get the word out then perhaps the IPT would have succeeded. However here is another situation where the UPA did not do that which they promised - premise number one, secure the money. One thing that they did do however was to insure that most of their innermost chosen membership became IPT chosen players. But that is another topic.
The point is that pool CAN make it. But not until the players do in fact stand up for themselves and withhold their talent in exchange for treatment that rewards the time they have spent attaining world class skill.
And for the record, being a pool professional is about a useless thing to be in the grand scheme of things. As is being a cue case maker. Try trading a pool lesson or a cue case for some bread.
BUT is still something that is a clear display of man's mastery over the elements. Seeing someone control the spheres so skillfully is entertaining. Especially for fans like myself. It is something that I gladly pay for and in fact is appreciated more when I pay for it as opposed to getting it for free.
So as long as people want to earn their living by contesting in pool against other highly skilled players then they either need to organize or accept that they are at the mercy of fate.