Some people are going off track a bit. The question was all things being equal ( in this case a plain cue, no inlays) which cuemaker's cue would be worth the most money. This is not asking what one or two people would pay, or if they would even like it or not. What the secondary market value is for such a cue and how it would compare to another similar cue by another maker. This is not a thread for which is better and how, etc. Purely what cuemaker is bringing the most money on the market.
I may really like cue brand x, I may feel that no other cue even comes close in quality, hit, feel, workmanship, etc. It does not change what the market value of it is. Cue brand y may get twice as much than my favorite brand x. I personally may never think that anybody in their right mind should purchase that cue at half of its market value. It does not change what the market value is. What determines that is the FACT that many other people absolutely WILL pay that much and maybe more for it.
So, if you owned a cue from 50 different cuemakers, and they were all a plain jane maple cue with a wrap, which one would sell for the most? This is the question. Not what your favorite one is, or which you would choose to play an important match and why. Or how this one has better construction than tha, etc.
Just my two cents.