"knowledge doesn't do much good when you're frozen, on the end rail" - The Game
The main reason the "old one pocket players" could beat the young, 9 ball players was more about patience than knowledge. You could make a case that they are connected and at one level they are.....at the championship level (at times) they are not. What it comes down to is not what a player knows about the game, it's what the player can do with the cue ball.....and how creatively he he can utilize his shot making, and calculate odds.
When a player has enough "fire power" and cue ball control he can defeat even the most knowledgeable player....for awhile anyway.
'The GaMe is the Teacher'
The main reason the "old one pocket players" could beat the young, 9 ball players was more about patience than knowledge. You could make a case that they are connected and at one level they are.....at the championship level (at times) they are not. What it comes down to is not what a player knows about the game, it's what the player can do with the cue ball.....and how creatively he he can utilize his shot making, and calculate odds.
When a player has enough "fire power" and cue ball control he can defeat even the most knowledgeable player....for awhile anyway.

usually the one that executes the best ie less misses /best conrtrol of whitey etc wins most games imo
but why is it that knowledgeable old one pocket players past their prime could beat the young straight shooting 9 ballers back in the day when one pocket info was not as readily available????
i disagree with your statement bolded above
if the spread in execution is not severe the one with more knowledge can win in one pocket over the player that would rob him in 9/10 ball
just sayin
icbw