Not at all. Your drawing is a breath of more-or-less logical air in this thread, even if it doesn't apply.LaMas:
Sorry if I intruded on this thread.
pj
chgo
Last edited:
Not at all. Your drawing is a breath of more-or-less logical air in this thread, even if it doesn't apply.LaMas:
Sorry if I intruded on this thread.
It can only be one thing: home schooling.
LOL.
pj <- sounds like Hal's Holy Trinity to me
chgo
It can only be one thing: home schooling.
LOL.
pj <- sounds like Hal's Holy Trinity to me
chgo
LOL.Pat, since you had post #900, YOU WIN THE PRIZE! Now, you too can be home schooled! All you have to do is get Stans' DVD!
It can only be one thing: home schooling.
LOL.
pj <- sounds like Hal's Holy Trinity to me
chgo
For a change that's one video I'd like to see. Go ahead and post it.I can block off 1/2 of my table and shoot blind shots all day. I could make a video within a few minutes proving it.
Stop with the sensitive act.Stop with the religious crap
Backpeddling already?Even if I posted a video, you'd say that doesn't prove anything.
For a change that's one video I'd like to see. Go ahead and post it.
Stop with the sensitive act.
Backpeddling already?
pj
chgo
Not knocking you for using CTE....but one of the biggest drawbacks to that system is the extra curricular activity involved with the set up...
I lose my straightness of stroke....I notice that you have a move at the end that would drive me nuts...(perhaps it does not bother you)
After you do you pivot and take your final stroke....at the end of your stroke the cue dives back to your left.....For you it may be happening "after" contact but it almost seems like it could cause stroke consitency problems.
It is more noticable when you get more square to the camera...(Check 3:39)
That is a hurdle in the system that I have a real problem with.....
If I were to ever use the system....I would have to do what has been termed an "air pivot"....but if that is the case....why do I need to pivot in the first place....an air pivot I guess would just identify the shot angle...or in my case the aim line I am going to set up on....If that is the case...I really don't need the system to identify the "aim line"
I will also take your word that you did not cheat by looking at where the rails (ontop of your view blocker) intersect which would give you the corner pocket.....or dare I say (ghost pocket)....:smile:
Even if you can see the intersect, it's certainly a bad reference. I KNOW I stroked crooked. Has nothing to do with the system. As I mentioned, I did this cold with no warm up. I'm not happy with the way I stroked at all. Please don't confuse that with the system.
By the way, you bring up a good point. The extra movement is me rocking back and forth to be EXACT with my eye placement. It's TOTALLY goofy; however, it's required when shooting blind. If you watch me play normally, I don't do that. However, if you're shooting into a blind spot -- you HAVE to in order to be perfect with your eyes.
Good point.
Not trying to knock anything....just playing devels advocate for a minute...I am not really against the system (I use 3-line)....I have problems with the mechanics of the system.
I think you need to add a (raised) blinder that takes away the "bad reference" of the rails intersecting....otherwise it will be considered a Penn & Teller trick.....:wink:
IMO it DOES have something to do with the system.....the proponents of the system have you "pivot" your cue out of "natural" alignment right before you shoot.....your body is going to want to make that cue go back into its "natural" alingment....thus your cue dives to the left....I used the 3:39 example because it was well into the potting of balls and it had a good view....In that particular stroke it looked like you "fought" the cue wanting to dive to your left....it acutally looks like it starts to dive left...you correct it back straight (on the aim line) and then it still took a dive to your left again at the end.
I think a must for the way your pivot your cue...(becuase it does look like a pretty big pivot on film)...is by doing a "hip pivot" so that the cue and stroke arm stay in the same relative "natural" stroking position....Easier said than done....IMO
I am sure it can be done....I am just not sure that I can do it.....consistently...:smile:
Edit: Weather you know it or not...you make a valid comment for I'm guessing somewhere in the 90+% mark of why people miss....It is not aim....it is mechanics....(for all systems)
The silence is deafening.
Nice shooting Dave!
I am speechless...nice demo flick...clean it up and sell it.:smile:
I don't mind being put under a microscope. I'll do one better:
If the detractors want to meet in person (not pro tour players, but the usual suspects in this thread), we'll repeat this test with some assistants who can put a blinder up between the CB and the OB and we can not only shoot at a blind pocket --- but a blind OB as well. Maybe give a 3 second time limit before the blinder goes up and then all you see is whitey and see NOTHING else.
Let's record the delta between my score and their score. That's scientific.
It is a nice gaff thing to do...but it honestly seems like a wast of time..
I understand what your saying in theroy (or reality) is that once you have the your center to edge (and maybe the parallell shift) you really don't need the OB any more since you have an aim track line to set the cue on.
But that was a question I broght up in the past (in another thread)....based on the system....once you have your shift and parallell shift........why (if using CTE) would you ever need to look back up at the OB since the final alignment step of the system says "pivot to center CB"
IF when playing pool...I only had 3 seconds to "view" the shot and then only allowed to view of the CB ....I would probably start using CTE......Shortly after I would quit since it would be alot like playing night golf..:wink: