The title says it all… were the players forced to pick between the 10 ball and the one pocket?
They aren't entirely forced to pick, but the Expo's policy of insisting that a player must forfeit a match if two are scheduled for the same time no doubt does play a part in the players' decisions.
The issue is at least partly logistical. The Expo is much shorter than, say, the DCC and they have to get both events in. It would be a real scheduling issue to try to accommodate multiple entries (and deep runs) in both events.
Gideon
but the Expo's policy of insisting that a player must forfeit a match if two are scheduled for the same time no doubt does play a part in the players' decisions.
Sounds like they have no idea how to run a Professional tournament.
The title says it all… were the players forced to pick between the 10 ball and the one pocket?
The one pocket was full at 32 and there was a waiting list. Last year they opened up (to 48?) and it ran a little late.
The title says it all… were the players forced to pick between the 10 ball and the one pocket?
How'd you do? I know from being glued to the 3Cushion event, you were still standing on Sunday morning.
Actually, the no nonsense approach is by far the best approach IMO.
Otherwise, you would have people playing in both events, screwing over the players who chose to play in only one event, when the player playing in one event, shows up on time, and finds out their match was rescheduled so that greedy pro pool player, could try to win as much money in both events.
That garbage has happened enough times in the past.
Be done with it.
The only problem that the current system causes, is that you have people buying entries into both events, and then forfeiting one, and taking up a spot where someone else who wanted to play, could have entered.
This isn't the derby with some master of the table hinged on who plays well in both.
Far from that.
This is a 4 day tournament.
Pick your favorite event, go play.
The double to single elimination garbage, that's an entirely different story.
But the whole, "let's give special treatment to everyone who wants to play in both, and screw over everyone who doesn't" has to stop.
All that does is make the situation worse, and enable players to be spoiled.
Like the players need more reasons to cry.
The SBE brackets show that Bob Jewett finished in 5th-8th place. Good going, Bob!
32 with a waiting list.I may have missed it but how many people were in the one pocket total? ...
32 with a waiting list.
Cool thanks. Not sure if it was SBE or another tournament but I thought I recalled reading one pocket was going to limited to 48? Guess it was a different one. So did you end up having to play the guy I mentioned ( Tommy Z )?
PS - congrats on your great finish Bob!
So you mean to tell me that the dumb a$$s should hold two tournaments, and poorly schedule the matches, and if a player has two scheduled at the same time because of the dumb a$$s running the tournament, they should have to forfeit one or the other?!
The answer is YES.
You really don't get it do you. LOL
This is 4 days.
Pick one event and stick with it.
What you are suggesting would never work.
Even if YOU were the one running and scheduling the event.
There is no way on earth you could do it in the given time frame. They barely get finished on time as is.
If you do what you are proposing, and a couple players do well in both, the tournaments wouldn't be over till Tuesday.
But that's ok.
You don't have to believe me.
You can go right ahead thinking that your superior scheduling skills, would be so amazing, that there would be nothing but smooth sailing.
Ain't happening though
Tommy Z beat Warren Kiamco in his first match, lost his second, then won 5 in a row to get to the finals. Here is the chart: https://www.dropbox.com/s/n0n1oo5rw64jk2d/Pro1Pocket.pdf?dl=0
As to your remembering a 1-Pkt. event for 48 players, that was the plan for the US Open One-Pocket Championship, which started today in CT. Unfortunately, they only got 16. Appleton had to drop out because of illness, and Orcollo got stuck in an airport.