Samiel said:
Considering the average Chess Grandmaster makes more than the average (pre-IPT) pool champion. I personally think that pool players should make a little more in their tournaments if Chess players are making more...
How do you figure? GM Nakamura won $25,000 for the U.S. Open Championship, and he is the very best GM our country has to offer. He is very NOT an average GM, and he is very much NOT a contender for World Champion. He also does not HAVE to win the US Open every year. Furthermore, chess is a dying beast in America, not that many big tourneys. As far as I know, there "might" be perhaps 3 tourneys per year wiith at least 7 rounds and a $10,000-$15,000 payout. Any fewer rounds than this, and it is a tossup to where even our best GM wins it.
The only way an average GM makes more than the average pre-IPT Champion is if he makes his primary income off giving lessons. Now, if we add in the fact that the great majority of GMs have Master's degrees or higher, then we might see the disparity in income.
ANYone with a Master's degree was a favorite to make more than a pool champion. Perhaps this is a statement as to the different relative worth to society.
And lets not forget that being a GM, and being a pool champion are two TOTALLY different things. One, being a pool champion CAN happen without a truly immense physical talent. Two, making Grandmaster takes both the dedication of a champion pool player, as well as an immensely rare intellectual gift.
Did I mention it usually takes about 11-13 years, as well? Most GMs start at 5 or 6 years old, an make GM (nowadays) anywhere from 16-18.
Don't make comparisons if you don't have the facts down.
Russ