I Irish634 Whatever Silver Member Feb 4, 2008 #1 After reading a bunch of threads where cue dimensions are tossed about, I am a little curious about something. Why is the tip diameter the only dimension that is in metric, while all other dimensions are referred to in standard?
After reading a bunch of threads where cue dimensions are tossed about, I am a little curious about something. Why is the tip diameter the only dimension that is in metric, while all other dimensions are referred to in standard?
JoeyInCali Maker of Joey Bautista Cues Silver Member Feb 4, 2008 #2 I believe because the leather tip sizes were in metric. You don't find any .512" tips do you?
I Irish634 Whatever Silver Member Feb 4, 2008 #3 JoeyInCali said: I believe because the leather tip sizes were in metric. You don't find any .512" tips do you? Click to expand... Nah, I don't see them of course. It just struck me as being odd that one dimension is metric while the rest is standard. Thanks Last edited: Feb 4, 2008
JoeyInCali said: I believe because the leather tip sizes were in metric. You don't find any .512" tips do you? Click to expand... Nah, I don't see them of course. It just struck me as being odd that one dimension is metric while the rest is standard. Thanks
M masonh AzB Silver Member Silver Member Feb 4, 2008 #4 probably to difficult for people to go around saying,"i like my shafts at .499" not .512" or,"you get more action with a tip that is .486"compared to .512?"
probably to difficult for people to go around saying,"i like my shafts at .499" not .512" or,"you get more action with a tip that is .486"compared to .512?"
cueman AzB Silver Member Silver Member Feb 4, 2008 #5 The original cue tips came from France and they were using the metric system so it just stuck. Plus all the other reasons given above.
The original cue tips came from France and they were using the metric system so it just stuck. Plus all the other reasons given above.
cuebuilder www.cuesbydavesucher.com Silver Member Feb 4, 2008 #6 Much easier to sat "13 milemeters" than "five hundred and eleven thousandths".