SQUERVE: Squirt + Swerve - different for different shafts.
The reason it seems to dig into the rail more is because you are applying swerve (when you hit low-side) which is in essence a small curve or mini-masse. The cue ball is traveling to the object ball on the rail more from the side when you use low-side rather than straight at the edge of the object ball when you are using side only. The side spin by itself provides little if any swerve so you have to aim closer to the cue ball due to the cue ball squirt and lack of swerve.
Firm believer that low some shafts squirt the cue ball less but still haven't come to a conclusion if the absence of squirt is a good thing or a bad thing.
JoeyA
Dr. Cue has a nice youtube instructional about this subject: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgvNSoFIbv4&feature=related
SPINDOKTOR said:You do realize the shot is rail first?
you could use Center Left and pocket the 4, I couldnt gurentee the same result however.. My reasoning was I want as much spin off the rail as possible, the low with side seems to dig into the rail more, for whatever reason.
SPINDOKTOR
The reason it seems to dig into the rail more is because you are applying swerve (when you hit low-side) which is in essence a small curve or mini-masse. The cue ball is traveling to the object ball on the rail more from the side when you use low-side rather than straight at the edge of the object ball when you are using side only. The side spin by itself provides little if any swerve so you have to aim closer to the cue ball due to the cue ball squirt and lack of swerve.
Firm believer that low some shafts squirt the cue ball less but still haven't come to a conclusion if the absence of squirt is a good thing or a bad thing.
JoeyA
Dr. Cue has a nice youtube instructional about this subject: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgvNSoFIbv4&feature=related
Last edited: