I would like to heard opionions if the combining of BCA Leagues, ACS, VENE, etc under one Brand Name would IYHO be a smart move for Pool, and the games promotion.
I think there should be a single national governing body for pool with combined rankings and common national championships. The problem is arranging it so the private businesses that are the leagues see some advantage in belonging to the common ... umm ... let's call it a "congress."CocoboloCowboy said:I would like to heard opionions if the combining of BCA Leagues, ACS, VENE, etc under one Brand Name would IYHO be a smart move for Pool, and the games promotion.![]()
Bob Jewett said:I think there should be a single national governing body for pool with combined rankings and common national championships. The problem is arranging it so the private businesses that are the leagues see some advantage in belonging to the common ... umm ... let's call it a "congress."
Why this comment?? Dontcha like him??CocoboloCowboy said:Plus Joe Salasar would be in Sin City only 10 days.
Craig Fales said:Why this comment?? Dontcha like him??
CocoboloCowboy said:In Arizona we got the following leagues.
ACS
APA
APL
BCA
VNEA
TAP
Seems like many peoople on different ships.
Blackjack said:And a lot of those leagues are "franchised" and the league operators operate them as a "business" - not as a weekly tournament at a tavern.
Go back and read what Bob Jewett posted. The leagues are private businesses. They have preset goals and people that are willing to work their butts off to help the organization (as whole) to achieve those goals. Operating a league is no easy task. Asking the APA to merge or join forces with the BCAPL or ACS is sort of redundant because some of these leagues came into existence so that the leadership could separate themselves from one or many other league formats and establish their own unique operation.
It may seem as of there are too many leagues out there (and we're not counting independent house leagues) but I believe that it gets people out there to play. Most of these players couldn't pick Efren or Earl out of line up, nor would they be able to tell you who Darryl Peach is, or what he won a world championship in (go out on league night and ask that question - you'll laugh you ass off at the blank stares you receive).
However, these players will purchase cues, chalk, cases, perhaps a home table, and this is a tremendous help to the industry. I believe that this is what keeps the industry afloat. 65-70% of my students come directly from APA and BCAPL. Hell, start 10 more leagues - it won't hurt me at all.
As Craig pointed out, the league systems work fine. It's the pro level that is a mess right now on almost every continent.
I would like to see some numbers that show industry sales that are directly related to the league systems. I guarantee you that the numbers for industry sales coming directly from VNEA players for 2008 would be several times the income generated by interest in the entire UPA if we combined 2003-2008. (Not picking on the UPA - the numbers would remain consistent no matter what pro or open level regional tour I pick)
We have to find out how to turn those numbers around before anybody will invest big money into our sport.