Teacherman said:And some people can handle classless people with class and some can't.
That is so True.
Teacherman said:And some people can handle classless people with class and some can't.
Jude Rosenstock said:Think of it this way... It's a lot better than the guy that slammed the remaining balls on the table only to have them bounce all over the bar and throw his whiskey glass across the room (something one of my APA opponents did after I had a nice out). People are going to express their anger from time to time. At least this was subtle.
Jude M. Rosenstock
Teacherman said:And some people can handle classless people with class and some can't.
whitewolf said:...Granted, the APA handicapp system doesn't deal well with new players...
whitewolf said:Granted, the APA handicapp system doesn't deal well with new players, and I don't either LOL, especially for SL7s who somehow get ranked an SL2.
WW
FLICKit said:...After about 6 matches, the player should be very close to an accurate rating. After 10 matches, most all players are rated accurately, based on play.
Teacherman said:After about 6 matches the players trying to win should be very close and then only if their opponent was trying to win.
Very few on the competitive teams in the APA are close to what they should be.
Every new APA player is first given a handicap without ever being watched. What a joke.
The ONLY handicapping system that can work is a league operator watching the players play and judging each player against known players and their handicaps..........
FLICKit said:...Every new APA player starts off in the middle handicap and go up and down based on performance over time...
lunchmoney said:I wouldn't call you petty at all, I know exactly how you feel. Some people can concede a game with class and some can't.
Lunchmoney
Teacherman said:No need to read the rest of your post because you don't/won't understand.
...."based on performance" is where it all falls apart.
I'd be an APA 7 if I moved to your town and showed my speed. BTW, so would people who play up to 2 balls below me and/or 5 balls better than me. What is fair about that?
But, the bigger problem is, if I wanted to, I could make my handicap be whatever I wanted it to be. And only show a little speed here and there.
And you're proud of this system. You believe it helps pool. You believe it is part of the future of pool.
Pool will not grow until several factors come into play. One of which is league play is taken over by billiard rooms and jerked out of bars.
FLICKit said:As was already asked... why are you so bitter?
First of all sandbagging happens in any system. No matter what you devise, there will always be a way to cheat. But there are methods that are used to weed out the cheaters and make it not worthwhile.
There are other advanced leagues within the APA that top players can compete in. At the top level, there is no need for handicaps, so it's a non-handicapped league. This creates more avenues for big money within the pool community.
FLICKit said:As was already asked... why are you so bitter?
First of all sandbagging happens in any system. No matter what you devise, there will always be a way to cheat. But there are methods that are used to weed out the cheaters and make it not worthwhile.
There are other advanced leagues within the APA that top players can compete in. At the top level, there is no need for handicaps, so it's a non-handicapped league. This creates more avenues for big money within the pool community.
pete lafond said:I think billiards should grow in billiards rooms and also grow in Bars. Why, because it's growth. Further more I believe that billiard rooms should conform to bar league handi-cap systems as well. Actually there should only exist one handi-cap system for everyone. This creates standards which is fair for all. There are to many off-the-wall handicap systems that try to do to many things. Golf has one system, lets do the same. Actually someone should start a topic - "Your opinion, create a fair and simple handicap system". Maybe this forum can agree which could be a good start. If it gets enough publicity, the league players can then demand that their league use it.
pete lafond said:I think billiards should grow in billiards rooms and also grow in Bars. Why, because it's growth. Further more I believe that billiard rooms should conform to bar league handi-cap systems as well. Actually there should only exist one handi-cap system for everyone. This creates standards which is fair for all. There are to many off-the-wall handicap systems that try to do to many things. Golf has one system, lets do the same. Actually someone should start a topic - "Your opinion, create a fair and simple handicap system". Maybe this forum can agree which could be a good start. If it gets enough publicity, the league players can then demand that their league use it.
Teacherman said:With all due respect pete, you fall into the "customers without a clue" category.
Teacherman said:How long have you been around pool????? Where do players go? Where the money is. What is the nature of players. Get the money. Anyway possible.
And, the only answer for sandbagging is in house leagues. Yes, they will always try. And, yes, I can always spot them before they ruin the league session. The APA can not. In fact, the APA doesn't see a single player play until it's too late.
Teacherman said:Pool will not grow until several factors come into play. One of which is league play is taken over by billiard rooms and jerked out of bars.
FLICKit said:Where else can you win $15,000 whether you are a beginner, intermediate, or advanced player?
LOL.. You are so clueless again... There are other ways that the APA can watch a player as well. But you know not what you are talking about. So it's pointless.
Here's a challenge.... What league do you like, other than your own, and why? Let's see if you can actually say something constructive instead of destructive.