Year 2007 overview with a Mosconi Cup winning team member (long but recommended)

Vahmurka

...and I get all da rolls
Silver Member
Dear AZers, I managed to interview Russian pool star Konstantin Stepanov for our local pool site. (He was a member of a Mosconi Cup 2007 winning team in case you missed that.) It has turned into tradition to talk to Kosta in the end of every season or after any big event. We had a long and interesting conversation, which is nothing special because Stepanov is a very interesting interlocutor. This time he told some very interesting things so I decided to pick those which must be familiar to you and translated those parts (please note that if any uncertainties or unclear things it is only me to blame as a translator). It took several hours to do but I believe it was worth doing. Enjoy!

Year 2007 overview with Konstantin Stepanov (extracts)

Q: After the European championship when asked about your dream for the moment you told us that it was being picked in team Europe for the Mosconi Cup. Now it's dreams come true, you not only were selected to play there but won!

KS: Yes, that's fantastic. For the first time when I realized Mosconi Cup can be a reality for me was last year, 2006, when I was one of the candidates along with David Alcaide and Sandor Tot. This time I couldn't believe I was in the team even when it was absolutely clear, because I couldn't imagine what an event it is and how it looks like. Of course I watched it on TV but being a part of it is a lot different to what you see on the other side of the screen.

Q: You secured your team place finishing on top of European ranking after the Holland Eurotour stop in Weert. You've been leading the rankings for three months by that time. Did you know that being number one guarantees Mosconi Cup team place? Did that influence your mind during the season?

KS: No, I didn't think about that at all because I didn't know the regulation. Only when I learned that before Weert event which was declared decisive I was anxious about that a bit. But in general I didn't link these things directly, being Europe number one and being included in Mosconi Cup team.

Q: And being on top of EPBF rankings you traveled to the USA to take part in straight pool world championship (because you were runner-up to Niels Feijen at European 14.1 championship).

KS: Yes, and that was one of my worst results during the year, despite I didn't lose any of 7 games at the group stage. I must admit my group wasn't tough, it was actually one of the weakest in my opinion. Two girls, though one of them mighty Jasmin Ouschan. My straight pool knowledge turned out to be better than that of the majority of my group players. The hardest match was vs Allen Hopkins. Diamond tables are hard for straight pool because you tend to play slower and more pragmatic there. But nevertheless I played relaxed at the group stage and it was all right until play-offs. There my game was down, I was tired of multiple tournaments by that time and wasn't motivated enough to perform. Additionally the tournament wasn't organized well enough, and perhaps one looking from aside could hardly call that a world championship. They were clarifying the rules of the game for several hours just prior the tournament start. There was no clear regulation, the score was kept on boards with markers... Organization was not at high level.

Q: You didn't go to the US Open again, why was that?

KS: I played there twice, in 2001 and 2002. Since then I didn't play there because the tournament is too long and it costs me much. On the one hand, I would like to play there again, but on the other, there are a lot of tournaments in Europe now which are similar to Eurotour events in terms of format, and they are 3-4 times cheaper to visit than the US Open. The prize fund is less there of course, but chances to win prize money are bigger.

Q: Next in tournament schedule is World Pool Championship 9-Ball. What do you think about new format of preliminary stage where round robin was replaced by double elimination groups?

KS: Every system has some drawbacks. In round robin there is room for meaningless or fixed games, and you can do nothing about it. New system eliminates that. But it in turn is not perfect in regard with strong players often facing one another in the same group and some players who you would like to see in play-offs get eliminated. So-called "groups of death" are drawn often, and that's what is not very good about new system, but in terms of fair sports it is quite acceptable, so I would prefer it stays like that.

Q: The rest to cope with should be soft break, right? Though some say you can't force players shoot it in a certain way since it's just the same shot like others.

KS: Yes, soft break is the thing to beat and they officials work on it, I think they will come with some decision sooner or later. Breaking restrictions are enforced only to make our sport more watchable and popular, because every event promoter wants his product to be appealing and interesting for the viewers. Soft break makes the game look boring and predictable, thus killing all the interest. I have never been using soft break and will never be. I think if it can not be eliminated when playing 9-ball, in time it will be replaced by 10-ball at the WPC, I'm not the first to come out with such an idea. But at the moment positions of 9-ball are strong enough, it has been a symbol of the game for long time and it's hard just to throw it to trash.

Q: How did you feel when it became clear you were going to face The Magician himself, best cueman ever like the majority believes, Efren Reyes?

KS: I can't say I was absolutely self-confident. Certainly I was very nervous before the game. But it went in such a way that I started playing good from the very beginning. As soon as the match started my nerves settled down and I started to keep this feeling through the game. I managed to do that, and what helped me along was that Efren made several mistakes. Having seen that I realized something was wrong with his game and I had to add pressure to use that in my favor. And when the score came back to even at some moment (3-3) I well knew that after several racks I became mentally stronger than before.

Q: What did you think before a game against another strong Filipino fighter, Jeff De Luna? He seemed to be very confident if not self-assured during the tournament.

KS: He is a very strong player, crazy shooter, very powerfull energetically, he is a tough opposition. I caught a glimpse of him during practise, and I knew he won a local tournament with all mighty Filipino players present just before the WPC. But after I defeated Efren it was easier to prepare mentally for De Luna. And again, my opponent started making mistakes, Jeff struggled harder than before when he played me. When facing a strong opponent you usually feel if his game is tuned well or there is some problem, and so did I when watching him. I noticed his uncertainty and led the game like I needed to the very end, running out last three racks. It was easier to play De Luna than Reyes for me.

Q: What prevented you from overcoming the next hurdle, namely Karl Boyes? Hardly anyone expected that it would be him to beat you after you passed two strong locals.

KS: It is some sort of a paradox, because it happens quite often when the strongest of the two - in the majority's mind - doesn't win. I was preparing mentally to face the Filipinos as if it was my last fight to survive, and I can't say the same about my match vs Karl. I didn't need to beat thousand percent of it, I just needed to play good, that's it. Because actually at that WPC there was no any difference between Reyes and Boyes. Karl played almost perfect, very good, he didn't make any single mistake in open layouts. In this game it was me to be nervous from the beginning, I played without confidence and made several errors, last being quite an easy ball missed, and that was it.
Moreover, he was using soft break which killed me completely. I just don't have mental ability to play against soft break, because with soft break you face a system, as if you hit a wall. It like switches you off, your will to fight - because when you break strong you rely on luck to some extent, and at the same time you know that your opponent eliminates luck factor. That kills self-confidence and will to fight to the end.
Of course we can mention opponent's soft break as a key factor to my loss but there also was some underestimation - not by me personally but by the majority of people. They considered Boyes to be easier rival than those I defeated before, and it was hard for me not to listen to them because I lived in the society and communicated with other people.

Q: After your defeat some supposed that when you were playing Filipinos you were an underdog, but in match with Englishman it was you who was a favorite and you couldn't cope with that role, is that correct?

KS: Probably it is. At the world championship where you are involved in only one match (at the play-off stage) the most important thing is mental preparation. The match will go the way you tuned yourself. Most probably in this particular game I was destroyed by huge volume of irrelevant information. But we should also give credit to Karl who was almost flawless throughout the tournament.
 
continued

Q: Okay, here we go with the season apex which was the Mosconi Cup. What came to your mind when you learned the final team Europe roster? What did you think such team could achieve?

KS: For me personally this team was ideal, because all the team members were easy going and communicative people. In my opinion, for example, Oliver Ortmann is not a man of a kind. I knew all my future teammates pretty good except Daryl Peach, somehow it happened that we didn't talk much before. But as soon as we started I understood that we have an ideal team, the atmosphere in the team was very friendly. Daryl turned out to be very nice and humorous guy. All the way he was entertaining us with famous English humor, you know, staying serious himself. Everyone was unique, we were completely different, I think it was most diverse European team ever. Take for example Tony Drago who doesn't fit in any team limits and who, how reality revealed, can hardly play any team match. Or Ralf Souquet who is used to order and regulation and found himself in that mess of us. He even felt uncomfortable at first because he took the tournament very seriously and was very eager to win. For that reason Ralf was our best trump from the very beginning because the rest of us were feeling his confidence.

Q: What did you expect from the team, did you think you could win?

KS: I realized that team play is very different from individual one. At any given moment members of the team are differently prepared, some better and some worse. Like Daryl who was in a gap after winning WPC title and won only one game of five played. But a team is called a team for a reason, there some are leaders and some have a right to make a mistake. I understood we won't escape some trouble but the same I understood about team USA, because their squad, very experienced and with multiple titles under their belts, was at the same time aged enough and had some inner problems. And it turned out to be right, I noticed that from the very start.

Q: What role did non-playing captain Johan Ruijsink play in the team?

KS: He was like another team member, and sometimes even more. It was him to choose correct team preparation and overall game strategy. There was very hard moment after the first day and he held the pressure and worked it out very professionally.

Q: Could you tell us about some things inside the team, like decision making, player selection?

KS: We arrived to Las Vegas only 2 days prior the tournament and we had to gather in a short period of time, to find common language, so we started right away. On the next day we went to a poolroom provided by some American, there were two Diamond tables with cloth recovered, so it was similar to the tournament table. There we were practising, communicating, eating - all the time we spent together. It doesn't mean we were talking about pool all the way, in the evening we were just talking about something irrelevant, joking, telling stories, just like you would in normal life. But when it was required to concentrate quickly Johan took his part to bring us to the top of it in no time.
Johan was the head of the team and decision maker, but he did ask for player's preferences. Like it was my preference to play first game on the final day, as I didn't want to bear the responsibility of decisive matches because I wasn't most experienced player.
We worked pretty well as a team in first two days though it was yet to be tested under the lights and cameras to tell the truth. But the atmosphere in the team was good. And it depends on results of the team very much, because if no result achieved the team starts to fall apart. After Day One we felt disunited, we didn't act as a team, and Johan insisted that we should pursue our goal, that we came there not only to play but to take the Cup.
By the way I've heard the Americans made a bet against themselves before the start. May be it was said just to mislead us, but it could be that they were trying to hedge the risk and earn money either way, winning or losing.

Q: Very interesting, but the Europeans lost Day One with disastrous 1-4. What did you feel, what did you do?

KS: Usually in such a situation you try to find someone to be guilty of your misery, the team has to find a scapegoat to put some steam off because there was quite enough of it. We played awful, we didn't work as a team, made a lot of mistakes. Just because it is unique feeling being there which can't be compared to anything else, to any tournament seen on TV. Because it is not an individual event but there is a team behind you you feel nervous from the very beginning.
So after the first day we were in trouble. We were supposed to meet in a practice room in the evening, all together to analyse our mistakes and come out with a decision - and not everybody bothered to attend. Johan was quite angry about that, but then he had a conversation with him or them later and the problems were solved. We realized that tomorrow it was going to be different.
Johan worked great as a team captain and coach, like he decided that Tony Drago should play single matches instead of doubles because he felt uncomfortable there. And you know what happened, Tony won all four and was awarded an MVP of the tournament. He won very important match against Rodney Morris when he was down 1-5 in a race to 6. After that win Tony has become our engine and beacon. From there we played like we had wings, we started playing as a real team and supported each other both during the games and behind the scene. We forgot all the contradictions and no negative emotion was in the team.

Q: Did you like a game where all the team was involved, playing 5 vs 5?

KS: Yeah, it was great, and I think there should be more such matches, after all Mosconi Cup is a team event. Final day should be decided by singles, but team games are great, like before they played in threes and so on.

Q: You played doubles with Drago, Peach and Feijen. Apparently the latter you enjoyed most? Though you didn't communicate a lot which was quite unusual, and after the match Niels said it was your collective decision to play each other's game and relying upon the partner.

KS: Yes, I felt most comfortable playing with Niels. May be it did look unusual but it was good because both of us well realized a certain thing we figured out during practise. At any given time our task was to pocket a ball and play as good position on the next as possible. So I made a shot and didn't think about what was going to happen next, as if I didn't care. Somehow I knew everything will be all right and I was sure about that so much that I couldn't even imagine Niels could do something wrong. So we were pretty sure in each other. Again, playing with Niels was very comfortable.

Q: Did you feel comfortable with the shot clock? Players were rushing the shots very often when they heard the buzzer. And how did you like the sound?

KS: The shot clock was pretty disturbing, I got caught a couple of times on hard shots, and I think no player managed to escape that. It was similar to being pushed in the shoulder during preliminary strokes. I think it could have been better if the buzzer started 10 seconds before the end, so that the player knew he still got some time to aim properly. And the sound was awful.

Q: Could you name some special coaching methods of Johan Ruijsink, either drills or psychologic?

KS: There was enough of mental work. Like we had a special pre-game routine which we used every day and there was a lot of fun. I don't remember exact words now, but we gathered in circle and responded to Johan who was asking "Where are best players?" - "In Europe!", "Who wins the Mosconi Cup?" - "Europe!", something like that.

Q: Besides you had a great flag.

KS: Yes, it was our banner. Johan carried it everywhere we were heading to. Either eating or practising, our flag was always with us there, everytime. Before the tournament we've been told that the best player will take it home afterwards.

Q: Meaning it was Tony Drago to get it?

KS: Yes, Johan mentioned Ralf did great job at certain moments and he well deserved to get that award but if we measured Tony's achievements it became obvious that it was him to receive the flag. I suppose he presented it to his mother, Tony said it would be a wonderful present for her.

Q: What do you think about breaking restrictions at that event? Probably all of them put together was too much?

KS: The break was very special and we couldn't get used to it at first. We were experimenting, came out with several solutions to the break. We didn't choose to break hard and hit the yellow ball full in the face because it didn't result in pocketed balls.
On the very first day we noticed that the Americans didn't know how to break properly, because everybody was breaking his own way. Unlike, we chose a certain way to break and all of us were utilising that break. Team USA noticed that and used the same break the day after. The only drawback of that cut break was that the cueball was heading towards side pocket way too often, occasionally being knocked straight in by passing balls. Breaking like that was quite good except the shot itself is disgusting. It both looks and feels like that. But I think it was good in general because it brought some unpredictability so it was interesting to watch.

Q: Which of restrictions would you exclude?

KS: Crossing the headstring alone is not sufficient any more, because such rule is used at Eurotour events and there is a system created already which allows to stick to that rule and play shape on the yellow one consistently. Though it is not a soft break in common sence but we are dealing with a system again which allows to control the first ball. I regret we can't force players to hit the head ball full in the face in order to pocket it in the side often. Pro players were trying to play the one in the side before soft break was invented, and the final layout was unpredictable.
What I wouldn't do is shifting the rack. The head ball should remain on the spot, and Ralf Souquet has the same opinion. The game was created to be played like that, it has its own history and traditions, so you shouldn't change that, otherwise it is not 9-ball any more.

Q: Well, back to the action. After Day Two team Europe managed to equalize the score. Day Three, and you made several outstanding shots during doubles match with Feijen. Like a very thin carom shot off the red three. TV commentators said one couldn't contact that ball any thinner. The position was so tough that only a safety seemed logical and it even looked like you fluked that shot. Did you go for it intentionally?

KS: Yes, it was intentional. I was able to see the edge of the three ball, about 2 millimeters (less than 1/8 of an inch), and I saw that if I manage to hit it thin I will pocket the seven. And this shot selection was ideal for that position because the cueball then parked in shape on the three easily. So I took the risk though perhaps anybody else could hardly see that shot possibility.

Q: The playing session of the third day ended with rumble. After Souquet vs Strickland match Daryl Peach threw a pacifier to Earl. Could you tell about that?

KS: Yeah, really. It was quite a big pacifier, just to fit Earl. Because everyone was mad about him, his teammates included. It was obvious because he was ruining team atmosphere and was pulling the team back. Like missing too many shots in doubles. When you play for yourself let it be, but when you play for team it is another story, and you simply can't let such a man in a team. Despite all his titles, Earl's behavior is unacceptable. They say he's been diagnosed schizophrenia and has to take meds to be in full control.
We knew he was unbalanced so during all games he was involved we were more active cheering and supporting. It did work good enough to shake him, he lost control there. And it was our tactics, our trick. After he lost to Ralf he threw his hand after a handshake and said some rude words calling Ralf names, etc. I believe Earl could be easily banned from pool for a couple of years for that. That's why I think a joke with pacilier was great.

Q: You mean it was a joke prepared in advance and a pacifier was carried specially to be thrown to Earl regardless of how the match ends?

KS: Yes, it was carried intentially, so that it could blow his mind.
 
finished

Q: But it looked too harsh on Earl, and American viewers didn't like that act of a world champion. They decided it was his own initiative and were curious if Peach brings dummies to every tournament he is in and so on...

KS: No, it was a team decision. The initial idea belongs to Daryl really and I don't even know where he got that pacifier. But when he presented his idea to us we were delighted. And it was a team decision to throw it to Earl when he starts talking too much - to show he should keep silent. It was just a joke, don't forget that Mosconi Cup is not only a tournament but a show and it is great there is a room for fun as well and play a joke, even an evil one just a tiny bit. Earl himself is a more severe thing than such a pacifier in my opinion, and what he said to Ralf is dozen times worse than such a joke by Daryl. Remember later Daryl tried to stay calm and didn't react on Earl's talk until he did really get under Daryl's skin when Peach even raised from his seat to threaten Strickland? I'm on Daryl's side there.

Q: But it looked too harsh on Earl, and American viewers didn't like that act of a world champion. They decided it was his own initiative and were curious if Peach brings dummies to every tournament he is in and so on...

KS: No, it was a team decision. The initial idea belongs to Daryl really and I don't even know where he got that pacifier. But when he presented his idea to us we were delighted. And it was a team decision to throw it to Earl when he starts talking too much - to show he should keep silent. It was just a joke, don't forget that Mosconi Cup is not only a tournament but a show and it is great there is a room for fun as well and play a joke, even an evil one just a tiny bit. Earl himself is a more severe thing than such a pacifier in my opinion, and what he said to Ralf is dozen times worse than such a joke by Daryl. Remember later Daryl tried to stay calm and didn't react on Earl's talk until he did really get under Daryl's skin when Peach even raised from his seat to threaten Strickland? I'm on Daryl's side there.

Q: You mentioned why you played a starter on the final day against Shane Van Boening. You met him at the WPC in Manila for the first time, and like the majority of pool fans around the world you must have discovered him only this year. Tell us what you think about him.

KS: Shane is a very strong player. I suppose he is the strongest among all the Americans at the moment, and he is young enough to have time for further improvement. I would say he has one advantage - which you would never call an advantage in ordinary life but it is like that in regard with pool - that he is 98 percent hearing impaired. It is absolutely special level of concentration. At the same time he makes his living playing pool and probably has been living all his life only playing. Playing and gambling since his childhood. I think he is most composed player in the US. And if we take a look at various elements of his game, I bellieve his strongest part is safety play and kicking. He is always able not only to hit the ball but to hit it at deserved side and even required cut. He plays wonderful off the rail.

Q: Do you agree he is a future world champion?

KS: I suppose that is correct. I won't be surprised to see him winning the worlds because he is one of rare players who love the game so much and are dedicated to the game so much and who are able to study it that deep. Certainly he spent so much time on it, literally lived with the table - just like Efren Reyes perhaps. Shane has a lot to be learned from. I mentioned his strong side and that was where I lost our encounter I believe though I was leading 4-2. Both of us missed some easy balls in the early stage of the game and I can't say I lost in terms of tactics. I did my best for the moment playing safe but he returned that on me or put me in situations where I could do nothing. Partly it was luck, partly it was him to compose himself and made it clear he wouldn't give up without a fight. And he just didn't lose any of those safety battles, and in the end almost every rack was like that. Every time I hooked him he managed to solve the task. So we should give credit to Shane, winning that game was his own merit. He made several outstanding shots I didn't expect to happen. I thought I was in command in those situations but it turned out I was not.

Q: When you were talking in Manila Shane invited you to come to the US and play in Action Challenge 10-Ball which has become popular recently. You have a background of challenge matches against Souquet and Stalev, races to 35 (first lost, second won). What do you think of Shane's offer?

KS: It is interesting but it is not where I belong. Here our interests with Shane are opposite. He is a real gambler, so I can never match him in such conditions. It is much more interesting for me to play in tournaments rather than gambling in a long race. I never play long races for money because I get tired. I don't see any particular reason to play money games seriously because when gambling you win today and lose tomorrow, meaning you play for the sake of not the result but process. I don't think it could bring me any additional fame or bonus so I don't think I will be part of such action.

Q: There is a place on Earth where gambling action is about to start and go on non-stop, 24 hours a day. That's Louisville, KY, famous Derby City Classic. Almost every year you plan to go there and still you have never been there. Any reason?

KS: Yes, this time it's quantity of tournaments I played during the season. I just can't devote all my life to pool, I have other interests and I need other emotions, that's just what I am. May be it is not very good for the game and in terms of professionalism I should invest more time in it but I can't limit my life to the rails of the table. I need to rest, I need to have fun and be involved in other activities. Sometimes I get tired of multiple tournaments especially if they are enegy-consuming. Just like now when I returned back from Mosconi Cup I decided to rest for a month and will not even think about anything, just resting and regaining power. So the main reason for not being at Derby City this time is that pool is not everything in my life, I can't tell if it's good or bad.
I hope I manage to visit Louisville sooner or later. Of course it depends a lot on how intensive my season will be, and if in the end of the year I don't have to play any big tournaments I will have more power and more motivation. Sure I want to go there, it is really fascinating event. If I didn't make it there this year I will schedule it for the next. Oh well, it is not very convenient for us Russians if it starts in early January, you know how we celebrate the New Year... If only someone loads me on the plane and I wake up in a hotel holding my cue... :)
 
thanks for the translation and a good read. but i have to admit i didn't like the tone of the way they were talking about the incident with earl. he, and the team, almost seemed gleeful about watching him torment himself.
 
worriedbeef said:
thanks for the translation and a good read. but i have to admit i didn't like the tone of the way they were talking about the incident with earl. he, and the team, almost seemed gleeful about watching him torment himself.
neither did I actually because I'm one of probably rare pool fans nowadays who don't feel Earl should be treated like he is. Especially if it is true about his illness. I still believe there is a way to deal with Strickland though he's been complaining about bad luck too often. (even during IPT challenge game vs Archer he continued that streak)
So I didn't appreciate to learn that dummy trick was intentional. But it was just like that, and it is history now.

btw I wonder why the interest is not high enough, I really liked the stuff he is talking about. Should I change the title to "Fatboy" or "OB-1" because those threads get about a thousand hits while this didn't get to a hundred? ;) May be I will give it another title later so that the content is more clear to everyone.

...oh my, it turned out thread title can't be changed :rolleyes: Even by thread starter. Time to ask for assistance ;)
 
Last edited:
oh, someone even considered rating the thread ;) Great pleasure that I (but mostly Kosta) managed to reveal you something you didn't know about pool scene :)
 
the title of this thread is a bit misleading, it should be:
NON FATBOY THREAD - Interview with godzilla who beat Efren without OB-1 shaft!!! (CLICKEY)
this will invite fatboy thread anthusiasts and opposers alike.

oh i concur, i think we need more pool scene and news from other parts of the world.

i also agree with kosta that SVB have some advantage for being hearing impaired. seems like he has a bit of autism that kept him to focus for a long time and kept his mental state (in tourney or practice).
this would give him the edge on long races, imho.
 
lost.in.space said:
i also agree with kosta that SVB have some advantage for being hearing impaired. seems like he has a bit of autism that kept him to focus for a long time and kept his mental state
Kosta is not the first to mention that, I suppose it was Shane's mom here in the forum saying that during some serious matches Shane can even turn his helping device off and hear nothing what could possibly distract him.

billbOK said:
Thank you for the work my friend ! I really appreciate this kind of stuff!
Rep for you !
LOL imagine it's gonna be my first rep point for this :D Okay, it's not about green I am concerned here, but what really worries me that people who like such stuff and would like to read could miss the topic anyway.
I couldn't give this thread straightforward title at that moment, but now when I made such a thread named "Interview with Stepanov" it got only 25 or so views... Well, perhaps too few care about foreign players even if they talk about such popular matters like Mosconi Cup and Shane Van Boening.
 
Vahmurka said:
....... but now when I made such a thread named "Interview with Stepanov" it got only 25 or so views... Well, perhaps too few care about foreign players even if they talk about such popular matters like Mosconi Cup and Shane Van Boening.


VAH,
I think you may be off-base a bit in your assumption. The number of views can be quite misleading. There are many worthwhile threads that occasionally fly past the radar - the initial date of this thread was the last Friday of DCC - THE BIGGEST POOL NIGHT OF THE YEAR for many of us here in the States. It is very easy for a thread to pass unnoticed on such a day. Don't take it personally.

I think that as the thread progresses you will find quite a few more views from the serious students of the game; and take it from me, I know we all appreciate it.

It is a great article, and is the kind of thing that makes the whole AZB forum worthwhile. Where else can we find first hand report from such a notable foreign player?

Not all AZB'ers are interested in the same things; but there are plenty that just love this type of information; so KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.

P.S. - perhaps you can also fill us in on the Russian pool scene. I was fortunate to observe Evgeny Stalev in action last year at DCC; how are such proficient players developed over there??
 
Last edited:
Excellent article. Your translation is superb. I'm always amazed at how fluent non-native English speakers can be.

It is interesting that Stepanov is not a gambler and would not take up Shane in a TAR match. However, Stalev is known for being a money player, and I think would be an excellent candidate for such a match (as long as we don't get "Shane Saturation").

By the way, I was talking to a Russian colleague and asked him what your Avatar means. He never heard of "Vahmurka". He said the elements were something like "bad cat". Any enlightenment on your avatar's meaning???
 
Thank you for your interview ,and the insights it provided from both you and Konstantin.
 
Read like a great interview to me. For what I seen of Kosta so far, I would say I like his style of play and demeanor. I wish there were more interviews like this with the star players around the world.

'Oh well' to the Earl incident. One man's joke doesn't always sit well with the next guy, not that I would have expected Earl to laugh about. The US vs Europe matchups in pool and golf have a lot to be desired of classy sportsmanship these last few years.
 
Derek said:
'Oh well' to the Earl incident. One man's joke doesn't always sit well with the next guy, not that I would have expected Earl to laugh about. The US vs Europe matchups in pool and golf have a lot to be desired of classy sportsmanship these last few years.

D,
I was also interested in the account of the "Great Pacifier Incident."

Earl's behavior and sportsmanship was poor. While Peach's attempt was not the funniest thing I've ever seen; certainly Earl deserved it, and had no grounds for complaint. It isn't brain surgery, a little humor is just fine with me.

The promoter's can choose whomever they like; and the captains can play whomever they wish. The Mosconi Cup will always be held back by the antics of Earl - it can't get bigger with such a low standard of sportsmanship. No American wants other people in other countries to think that Earl is representative of us (well...unless they have an incredibly underdeveloped sense of sportsmanship). If the Mosconi Cup aspires to the same prestige and level of international popularity as the Ryder Cup; some things will need to change. It's okay for what it is; but to truly get the nation behind the players would require some changes.
 
Back
Top