ok pj, ya wanna win, huh?? here are some FACTS...
you are correct about the book 'Zen in the Art of Achery' but that is not what i stated...
again if only you are interested, here is 'only' what i have been led to know and understand, right or wrong, again, only what i have have been led to understand...
according to the myth of Zen Masters there were experiments done on film to determine the veracity of great claims of Zen Masters
the arrow in the bulls-eye by a blind Master was demonstrated, and further, the blind Master then split the previous arrow...
all on camera/s
i would have hoped you would never doubt that i am a fool [not only you, but my wife and children too - lol] and that i never speak without knowledge, but i have had much more important hopes that also failed
so be it
anyway, all the best,
smokey
No, it wasn't. You're thinking of an episode described in Zen in the Art of Archery. The "blind man" was the teacher and the author was the student - and the teacher wasn't blind, it was just in a darkened room. The teacher later explained that it was just a fluke shot, and a shot that hits the previous arrow is actually a bad shot, not a good one.
pj
chgo
you are correct about the book 'Zen in the Art of Achery' but that is not what i stated...
again if only you are interested, here is 'only' what i have been led to know and understand, right or wrong, again, only what i have have been led to understand...
according to the myth of Zen Masters there were experiments done on film to determine the veracity of great claims of Zen Masters
the arrow in the bulls-eye by a blind Master was demonstrated, and further, the blind Master then split the previous arrow...
all on camera/s
i would have hoped you would never doubt that i am a fool [not only you, but my wife and children too - lol] and that i never speak without knowledge, but i have had much more important hopes that also failed
so be it
anyway, all the best,
smokey