Kaci, pro pool and prize money

wonder if it was predator or matchroom that took him by the ear lol

it is tough. but there is also a connection between play better and pay better..
Kaci wrote in another post about losing in the first round of the Arizona Open to Sun Yi Hsuan of Taiwan:

"Dunno the guy, but he played great."

I had to wonder. Did Kaci look up Hsuan's Fargo (778)? Check any YT vids? Do any scouting at all - what else was there to do in Yuma?

Kaci seemed slow to wake up to how good Hsuan is.

Kaci, pro pool and prize money

There are definitely more players out there Today, able to afford travel (Not too many tho) compared to the twentieth century, but what he's saying I've heard many, Many times in the past.
The road.... Appletons observations.....and it's playgrounds are a frikin' grind there's No guarantee, unless you don't miss like Earl for years that you'll make ends meet.
But they are ah comin', this is Shanes last yr to be able to win the US Open, kids with Good EYES are starting' to Show up.
South Korean Wu won the worlds when he was 16, and just won the largest payout for pro play, I think it was 1.6 million in China, definitely over a Million.

Pool chalk

All I can say is that I used the taom I had. I tried two colors. It was fine. Maybe it was fake, I have no clue. Next time it was time to buy chalk I grabbed a masters gross.

I didn't like the shape and cost.
I didn't have to worry about losing one down a pocket.
All the pool halls I frequent use masters.
If somebody walks off with my chalk, no problem.
I have enough to probably last my lifetime.
The cleanliness aspect was not different enough for me to care.

Push Foul Explanation

Here is where Dr. Dave explains parallel english so that now you too can understand. https://drdavepoolinfo.com/faq/sidespin/parallel-english/

Yes, and he gets it right:
parallel english: aiming technique when using sidespin where the cue is placed parallel to the line of aim for a center-ball hit (with no sidespin) resulting in no compensation for CB deflection (e.g., for shots where swerve is expected to cancel the effects of squirt and throw, resulting in no net CB deflection, or where the amount of resulting pocket cheat is acceptable).

Funny, the underlined part is exactly what I said. Maybe read it over until you understand it…?

pj
chgo

Kaci, pro pool and prize money

Eklent Kaci is very opinionated - god love him. He is not very happy about pool payouts, a point Darren Appleton also made in his new podcast. "Seems to have gotten worse and worse for some reason," Appleton said the other day.

Kaci wrote on Facebook:

Tournaments with 128-256 players and an estimated $250K-$500K all players expenses, yet only $50K-$100K in total prize money-it’s simply bad business.
It’s like a meme coin scam. Totally bearish
I’ll be skipping them. And i suggest u do the same.


Kaci followed up with:

To clear up any misunderstanding from my previous post:
There is money in pool, and we’re grateful to have Matchroom, the WPA, and Predator investing millions into this beautiful game.
When I referred to “bad business” I was talking about the smaller ranking events. Like Bucharest Open , Vice city open, btw my brother won them both.
There are still plenty of tournaments that pay very well.
I’ve built a good life by playing the game I’m passionate about, and I have consistently earned a good living from it over the years.
And u get to see every inch of the world.


***

This is not a new issue. Pro pool doesn't pay much, especially when adjusting for inflation. The sport does not attract outside advertisers or get much TV revenue.

If we take Kaci at face value, not many tournaments would be suitable financially for pros like him. I counted 16 events with payouts of $125,000 or more in 2026.

Eight for WPA-Predator events, six WNT events (7 if the WPC is held this year), the China Open, and the Qatar Open. Prize money is also decent for smaller fields in the Premier League of Pool, upcoming WPM and some Predator events such as Teams or mixed doubles.

Appleton estimates it costs $2,000 to $3,000 for each player to attend a tournament. That includes hotel, food and travel. It might be more for international flyers.

His biggest complaint is the top-heavy payout distribution. He thinks players finishing say, 64-98, should get about $3,000 apiece. Help them at least break even. He also criticized WNT for increasing player entry fees -- something Frazer said in the past she would like to do away with.

***

How do pool players travel at all? The very best have endorsements from Predator, Cuetec and other cuemakers. Unofficial sources put this income at $50,000 to $100,000 a year for top players. And $30,000 or less for lesser players. A few apparently get bonuses for winning major tournaments.

Top players also get money from companies that make tips, chalk, pool tables and so forth.

All in all, though, they don't make much. Most of their sponsorship money is probably used to cover their cost of attending big events.

Could WNT and Predator pay more? I don't know. There is no easy solution.

Whatever the case, the likely result is more players missing more events compared to a few years ago. I heard the Billiards Digest editor say as recently as a few weeks ago that some 9-10 spots for the US Open were still available. They used to get snapped up the same day in the past.

If there is one saving grace, at least for WNT, close races for spots in the Mosconi, Reyes and WPM means more players will be chasing points in smaller events.
As far as the US Open, you must stay in the hotel to register. Texas has lots of players who would rather not stay at the hotel due to being local. It is possible you don't have to if you live within a certain distance of the venue but I haven't heard the outcome for that.

Pool chalk

I don't experience any more or less skids or kicks between taom(green or blue) vs masters. The only time I seem to catch a skid is when the balls are freshly polished and/or when using a high cueball at slow speeds.

Do you experience something different or are you just regurgitating something you heard from a commentary or sponsored pro?

Taom still leaves marks on the cueball and cloth just like any other chalk.
Don't be silly
Dr. Dave has collected and presented empirical data and video for many years. This is knowable information for anyone that actually desires to understand it. Your anecdotal evidence is factually irrelevant unless it was done scientifically and presented for review.

To be honest, I'm not sure why I am continuing to present meaningful information here when you refuse to acknowledge actual data. What's the old saying about arguing with...

As I continue to state: your position on tip offset is valid. Your position on cleanliness and kicks is invalid. If you have any verifiable information to the contrary, I'm happy to consider it. But so far, it's just your keyboard.

-td

[edit: I went ahead and did a search for the relevant information: https://drdavepoolinfo.com/faq/throw/cling/ Continuing to ignore the universe of information available to you will speak volumes.]

Filter

Back
Top