Up

maha said:

he played to a 714 against 600 players and won. his fargo rating was lower than them but he played much higher, so the higher playing player won just as forgo would predict.

if he played to his rating he would not likely finished in the list.

why or how he played way over his rating needs to be determined.

Click to expand...

Why he played well is anyone's guess. He's not a rising young player and his robustness is 4k. Fargo predicted he would lose every match but the first one. His average opponent was a 632 so on average over that short event so his average match odds were 38% to win. At any rate I would consider this to be a major outlier and keep in mind I'm not attacking Fargorate but I started on this when Maha said fargo is "deadly accurate" at predicting who will win between two players. Not so much in my mind. Accurate? sure. But not "deadly"

hotelyorba said:

Wow, so you mean to say, there's really three chicanes in an otherwise fully straight stretch of road. You're right. That's serious.

Click to expand...

Never seen it but I know a lot of people need it.

There's also a lot of people looking for free money that would drive over plainly obvious hazards and then try to get money for doing it!

That leaves like 17 people who could handle a trip down that road.

Coos Cues said:

Tell me if you thought it was possible before the event that Eric were going to win? I didn't.

So why is there no way he wins it again?

Besides my point was to point out that fargo although a good indicator of skill over time is not "deadly accurate" to predict who will win.

So how have you done up there? I've been there lots with only a little success as far as results go. But probably more success than most. It's a tough row to hoe.

Click to expand...

To me it seems like a 30-40 point FR difference is pretty much an even match, either player can win. Doesn't BCA spot 1 game per 50 points of FR? If so its not really that shocking that 606 FR won the tournament.

Similar deflection but probably a crappy hit. You won't give CF a chance if you hate the hit.

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk

Black-Balled said:

There is nothing wrong or funny about that...well except you know if it was real, a lotta cars were damaged there when the line was straight

Click to expand...

Wow, so you mean to say, there's really three chicanes in an otherwise fully straight stretch of road. You're right. That's serious.

I purchased two of your controllers. Have you ship them yet? thank you

I do not interpret Fels’ advice as “slow roll” every shot. He’s saying stop hitting the balls too hard, if you are, which many do. They’re called “bangers” for a reason. There is a speed not so slow as to risk roll off and not too fast as to rattle the ball.

hotelyorba said:

also USA:
View attachment 898953

Click to expand...

There is nothing wrong or funny about that...well except you know if it was real, a lotta cars were damaged there when the line was straight

also USA:

I was disappointed in mine, they only hold two balls and one shaft.

Did the references ever get sent?

Can you post the details for #2 and the price?