Shane Wolford VS Anthony Meglino (Action) $216K

Wow, you've definitely been beaten by a woman on numerous occasions and it shows.
99% of men will say NO women with the same fargo rate has ever won over me :LOL:
When it comes to 700+ Fargo rate, that's when I think the rating should be adjusted for women, for many many reason. 500 or even 600, I can live with that but I don't think it's fair when it is above 700 range, keep beating other female and become 800 fargo then being beaten by a 700 man badly is what I dont want to see but do want to see for entertainment purposes LOL

Shane Wolford VS Anthony Meglino (Action) $216K

Someone in the chat said Wolford bets all of his own money. Which I find hard to believe, unless his family is wealthy or something, or he owns a very successful business. They seemed to know him on a personal level and was very adamant. Betting 125K of your own money when you are not even a top 5-10 player in your own country is ridiculously stupid. He's ranked #19 in the USA. He is the 2nd best Shane though.
It's comments like this that just prove how little you know. I watched a player in Vegas(they live there) beat another guy out of 240k 1pckt before 9am, this is/was a regular game for these guys(they weren't helpless but there was no chance of either of them finishing top 10 at derby) Helfert will know who I'm talking about.

If this were the case, nobody would ever bet a dime on pool.

Do you think millionaires shouldn't be playing for 100k cash and up because theyre not top pros?

Nevermind, I should have my head examined

'08 Sugartree

I'm selling 1 of my Sugartrees. I bought it used in December and it plays just like a Sugartree does. Hit and feel are top notch. 2x 13mm shafts and cue weighs approximately 19.1oz. You will not be disappointed in this cue. Asking $1150.00 shipped to the lower 48.

Only reason for selling this cue is I bought 4 more cues since then and this one doesnt get used now.

Attachments

  • 617657918_10241418579861107_7603057557700074671_n.jpg
    617657918_10241418579861107_7603057557700074671_n.jpg
    260.2 KB · Views: 147
  • 618087617_10241418581141139_8768566509803803554_n.jpg
    618087617_10241418581141139_8768566509803803554_n.jpg
    274.2 KB · Views: 152
  • 619404299_10241418578901083_3489968043878614414_n.jpg
    619404299_10241418578901083_3489968043878614414_n.jpg
    134.7 KB · Views: 148
  • 621639453_10241418582301168_8016713852611981829_n.jpg
    621639453_10241418582301168_8016713852611981829_n.jpg
    308.7 KB · Views: 148
  • 621823446_10241418580541124_6961143466076881485_n.jpg
    621823446_10241418580541124_6961143466076881485_n.jpg
    157.5 KB · Views: 145

Shane Wolford VS Anthony Meglino (Action) $216K

Regarding their fargos, Anthony is a really good one hole player. If he has a lot of one hole matches in the system, it could have skewed his rating a bit higher.

There was another match for 60k where the lower rating won. Thomas Haas 726 vs Julio Burgos 737. They played 4 total sets, 2 9 ball, 2 10 ball, all race to 21. Thomas won 3 decisively, and Julio won one hill-hill. Both players have thousands of robustness.
I just can't believe that people don't understand odds 🤷‍♂️

Play enough sets and a 600 is gonna beat an 800, doesn't mean Fargo is wrong, in fact it will probably prove its right

Shane Wolford VS Anthony Meglino (Action) $216K

I think they should rate men and women differently, at least when the rate is reaching 700.
From there, all female vs female matches should not have been credited as same as vs male matches.
I know they can figure something out, but except Siming Chen :LOL: (I like to keep the debate going LOL), all other womens fargo is overrated by at least 25 - 50 points, PERIOD.
Well Im glad you're here to set years of math and proof straight. How do the #'s know its a male or female Einstein? This should be good.

If nothing else you're a good troll, love it!

Shane Wolford VS Anthony Meglino (Action) $216K

Regarding their fargos, Anthony is a really good one hole player. If he has a lot of one hole matches in the system, it could have skewed his rating a bit higher.

There was another match for 60k where the lower rating won. Thomas Haas 726 vs Julio Burgos 737. They played 4 total sets, 2 9 ball, 2 10 ball, all race to 21. Thomas won 3 decisively, and Julio won one hill-hill. Both players have thousands of robustness.

Filter

Back
Top