I with you here.
Before this latest stint of high runs by Schmidt and Shaw, how did we know that Willie Mosconi's run was without a foul? Does the affidavit address whether someone was watching for fouls or what defined a foul (cueball vs. object ball, coaching, breaks, ball cleaning, etc)? Does it say how big the pockets were?
I don't understand nit-picking clear feats of greatness on the table. All the runs from Schmidt and Shaw in recent times are remarkable achievements.
As I understand it, if John Schmidt fouled in his latest run, then his run ended at 672. O.k. even still, he is one of two people who have proof of twice running over 600 balls. The same for Shaw whether run is 669 or 714, Shaw has twice run over 600 balls. Running 600 once is bonkers. Twice is clearly double-bonkers.
kollegedave
Actually, Justin is my friend. When I see him do something in rotation pool, I will be as happy as anyone, but he has yet to even attempt to do so.In his first major event in a long time, Bergman beat the following players across banks, singles and mixed doubles.
SVB
Gorst
Filler
Shaw
Biado
Maciol
Wojiecech
De Luna
Van Corteza
You are a hater.
Just accept the fact that Bergman is one of the best players in the world.
That would probably be illegalSend me some of what you are smoking.
4/4 on the spot shots from Jasmin, ice cold.
Jasmin Ouschan is falling apart against Brittany Bryant in this semifinals. She won the first set 4-1, and was trailing 3-0 in the second set but Bryant came back and won! Now Bryant is leading 2-0 in the 3rd set, winning 6 games in a row. They've both missed 8 balls each, but Jasmin's misses were during crucial points in the match where Bryant was able to take advantage and get the rack because of it. Jasmin is beating herself up and showing frustration at the table, which isn't helping.