WNT, WPA and 2026

The WPA table specs include how parallel the facings are. There should be a specified amount of closing as you go into the pocket. This is very, very important for how the pocket plays.

I saw Fedor give a side pocket a long, hard stare after a ball popped back out. Are they really 4"?
4" is what I heard the commentators say. I don't know if they were correct.

Edit: I take that back. Let me check back.
Ok, the commentators said the pockets were 4 1/8" corners and 4 1/2" center.

Buddy Hall talks "Deflection"

That's something I wrote. Danny played with a big shaft for years. Then one day he comes in and decides to sand down his shaft to a 12.5 on my lathe. He said and I quote that Lassiter used to say he could not see how players played with those fat shafts.
Danny did say later that it improved his game.


At the old Congress billiards in Miami golf on the 6 x12 was the big game. Rex Williams was in town and hung around for a while. He played some golf when he was there. Surprisingly he was world champion snooker player
But could not beat the golf players at the Congress. As you know golf tables have roll offs that have to be memorized.
Point is though, the players got fascinated with his snooker cues. It was not long before they were using these weird cues with the tiny tips playing golf.
I always found it interesting how billiard players hitting those big balls use those short cues with like 10 mm tips. I wonder what the physics of that is. I knew Bob Byrne. He in his books he shows playing pool with a billiard cue. I always thought that was a mistake and was giving the wrong info to the reader trying to learn pool.

Ray Schuler made me a cue once for pool. Unfortunately it had too many billiard aspects to it. From butt to shaft taper you could not play good pool with it.
Now we have CF that not too many years ago would have sounded ridiculous to players.
The game after a century plus from the first custom built cues is still evolving.
I remember seeing pictures of pool tables in old western photos from the eighteen hundreds. Could imagine what it must have been like playing back then.
I don't know where I am going with this. I should just get out of bed and do something useful.
3c players these days are around the 12mm diameter.

WNT, WPA and 2026

The Predator ARC table with the 4" side pocket seems to be unplayable even at the pro level. You can see players avoiding it if they can. Can the pocket be cut differently and still maintain the 4" width?
The WPA table specs include how parallel the facings are. There should be a specified amount of closing as you go into the pocket. This is very, very important for how the pocket plays.

I saw Fedor give a side pocket a long, hard stare after a ball popped back out. Are they really 4"?

dear diary: a 14.1 journey to nowhere

thanks, thats motivating to hear.

Login to view embedded media
here’s a condensed version of yesterdays heartaches.

roll off got me on the 11 at the end. gotta remember to keep the cue ball just above that speed.
I'm going to introduce you to a concept called an "insurance ball", you may allready know it, but here it goes: Whenever you break up a cluster, it's a good thing to keep a ball near a pocket, such that if you get stuck up against a ball, you could still easily pocket it. Usually then, it will be on the side you are shooting the shot from. When you chose to break the cluster using the 4 ball, you should have kept the 1 as an insurance ball. This concept is of special importance when breaking the cluster from underneath, as it is very easy to end up with no shot or end up having to shoot over balls etc. The challenging bit here is getting on the 4 without using the 1, which is why I don't think it was the right play in this instance. I'd stay above the ball to give myself some margin of error, even if it gives less power to breaking the cluster.

There is also another way to go which has much less challenging position play and it's removing the 5 (and whatever balls you need to get on it). And then using the 14 to get on the 3 IF IT GOES INTO THE RIGHT CORNER (if not disregard). You will almost automatically make a new breakball, breaking the cluster at the right speed. If you play it right you will have shots to shoot up table. You won't have an insurance ball per se, but it's less critical when breaking from the side. Also, since the ball you are using to break is inside the cluster, you will have a lot more control over how the balls spread out, than you did with the 4.

There is a 3. option that might be better than the other two, because it lets you keep your breakballs and lets you attack the cluster early. Also you can probably pick the cluster off cleanly if you shoot the 6 ball off first. So there are two potential ways to use it to attack the cluster using the 6.
option 3.jpg

option 1.jpg
option 2.jpg

Buddy Hall talks "Deflection"

I remember hearing somewhere that Danny DiLiberto used a 14mm shaft originally, and was a great player with one, but when someone convinced him to switch to the 13mm or lower, his game elevated even more.
That's something I wrote. Danny played with a big shaft for years. Then one day he comes in and decides to sand down his shaft to a 12.5 on my lathe. He said and I quote that Lassiter used to say he could not see how players played with those fat shafts.
Danny did say later that it improved his game.


At the old Congress billiards in Miami golf on the 6 x12 was the big game. Rex Williams was in town and hung around for a while. He played some golf when he was there. Surprisingly he was world champion snooker player
But could not beat the golf players at the Congress. As you know golf tables have roll offs that have to be memorized.
Point is though, the players got fascinated with his snooker cues. It was not long before they were using these weird cues with the tiny tips playing golf.
I always found it interesting how billiard players hitting those big balls use those short cues with like 10 mm tips. I wonder what the physics of that is. I knew Bob Byrne. He in his books he shows playing pool with a billiard cue. I always thought that was a mistake and was giving the wrong info to the reader trying to learn pool.

Ray Schuler made me a cue once for pool. Unfortunately it had too many billiard aspects to it. From butt to shaft taper you could not play good pool with it.
Now we have CF that not too many years ago would have sounded ridiculous to players.
The game after a century plus from the first custom built cues is still evolving.
I remember seeing pictures of pool tables in old western photos from the eighteen hundreds. Could not imagine what it must have been like playing back then.
I don't know where I am going with this. I should just get out of bed and do something useful.

Filter

Back
Top