U.S. OPEN 2026, Frisco, Texas, August 25-30
- By DieselPete
- Main Forum
- 1278 Replies
Glad he made that after the phone crap.
People suck.
People suck.
Referee giving Capito loads of time.
My thought on the Matchroom break rules is this:If the refs aren’t complaining about soft breaks, I’m not thinking or worrying about it.
He definitely is, but you won't hear the media call him that.You don’t think the mayor of NYC is polarizing?
100%.Good match for TV!
Well, you’re dancing around it. We all have views, everyone. So are we all polarizing?
It’s amusing that terms like this are never used to describe anyone but someone with conservative leaning views and it’s done to imply a bad connotation to having those views, It reeks of projection.
Meanwhile you never hear anyone with conservative leaning views refer to those with liberal views as polarizing, when many of those views promote aberrant behavior befitting a reject of the island of misfit toys. Interesting [emoji848]
Yes, I was saying the same thing.Good match for TV!
You’re trying to respond to a guy that clearly is trolling.View attachment 927388
He didn't soft break that one...
1 ball down, 4 balls past the head string.
Technically 5 balls past the head string, but the 4ball came back down to the side pocket.
Ha! I’m from New England, and there is no question what he meant!I had to look that up. I don’t know if that’s a regional expression or maybe it’s generational?
Well, you’re dancing around it. We all have views, everyone. So are we all polarizing?Well, I said yesterday that Joe is a polarizing figure (when we were speculating about the police presence). I do think he is - some love his views, some don’t. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t welcome him expanding the audience and sharing his love of the game.
Of course you can!Is Joe Rogan a Christ like figure who I'm not allowed to he even mildly critical of?
Fair point, and he’s not. He is not a professional commentator and it tells. MR just wanted him on for the opening.I appreciate his love of the game but that doesn't mean it's appropriate for him to commentating throughout the duration of the match.
Irrelevant. He’s just talking about pool. If he brings more attention to pool, on net, and it benefits the sport and it’s players, I’m good with that.Especially given that he's a polarizing figure
We are a big, diverse country. Someone is always bound to be offended.What exactly does that mean? That he holds opinions that you don’t agree with so he’s polarizing as a result? Really?![]()