How do LOW-COST CARBON FIBER SHAFTS Perform Compared to the Best?

I think it is fair to subtract 0.3 from the slow-speed numbers and 0.4 from the fast-speed numbers in the first video based on the Revo numbers in both videos. The natural pivot length numbers don’t need adjustment based on the short distance and very fast sleed (so cloth is not a factor).
That's why looking at same sizes between brands is a more useful comparison.

While I really enjoy any analysis/evaluation on deflection, and I respect Dr. Dave, not having a like-to-like test and, apparently, not being able to compare tests across videos, really does limit the practical uses of these comparison videos.

There is no criticism meant in that comment, any more than there is criticism meant against any shaft in this comparison video. Just observation.

Seeing other companies' cheapo shafts perform similarly to a $500+ Revo is quite interesting, of course.
In light of comparing across videos, I decided to summarize the results. Based on the Revo changes between videos, I decided it to multiply results from first video by .77 to account for changes in cloth, etc and this gives same result for Revo in second video.

I also added a field called "Variance" which is difference in deflection between Slow and Fast speeds, which would likely account for aiming adjustment needed.

It looks like Wheat State is the winner of the results. Whether it is worth the price is up to the buyer, but the results look good.

Dr. Dave, do you approve of these conclusions?

Attachments

  • Carbon Cue Graph.jpg
    Carbon Cue Graph.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 43
  • Carbon Cue Deflection.jpg
    Carbon Cue Deflection.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 45

Have you heard about Titlist chalk (by Dr. V's Custom Shop) before SVB's recent announcement?

Needed more Taom V10, so picked up Dr V's chalk and a cube of Pagulayan.

I use Taom for cleanliness - any properly applied chalk works fine in my experience.

Dr V's Titlist chalk is clean, but not quite as clean as Taom. Titlist chalks dusts up a bit like Masters. Taom almost never does.

The Titlist chalk is a little "creamier," though, and feels nicer to apply. Not sure I will switch from Taom, but I like Titlist so far based on how it goes on.

Haven't used the Pagulayan yet, but if it's just reformulated Taom in a square shape, I wouldn't have anything to say. Chalk shape is no big deal to me.

Now Fedor Gorst is about to come out with his own chalk.

Best thing that could happen is all the competition drives down prices. Shocked that Kamui still charges $30 or more for some versions of its chalk!

Gorst dishes on US Open, lopsided prize funds, long race with Filler

A few tidbits from Gorst on a recent webcast.

*Says some kind of long race with Filler this year seems more likely than not. Filler has shown more interest after beating Fedor in Vegas. Doesn't think some players - like a Kaci - could drum up enough money and support to make a long race worthwhile.

*Says Frisco is probably the best city in the state of Texas to hold a big tournament. Seemed pumped about the location change. Expects a lot of fans.

*Says participating in Bosnia at the European Open costs a U.S.-based player at least $3,500 to attend, and up to $5,000. A U.S. player would have to finish in the top 8 to make his money back.

*Says there's a "really good chance" Joe Rogan will play in the U.S. Open.

*Says St. Louis would "probably be the best location in the U.S." for a pool major.

*Says Predator is "probably losing a lot of money in its big events." Says it's crazy to think the Predator events could actually be making money. He pointed to the prize fund for the World 8 Ball Championship - $90,000 for the winner, $42,000 for the runnerup and $21,000 for third.

*Says prize money breakdowns aren't very fair, by and large. Pointed to the WPA 8-ball event. Also cited the $40,000 prize for a winner of most WNT majors, with the runner up getting $18,000. "Which is very, very ridiculous."

Still, "everyone will show up, and no one will say anything, so nothing is going to change."

Gorst went on. "But I am out here on the podcast, and I am saying it, so maybe Emily will hear it and send me a message. We'll see."

NOTE: Frazer claimed last year players wanted a bigger prize for the winner and less further down the food chain. Gorst suggested, no, players want the money spread out a bit more.

Gorst said promotors want to try to get more PR mileage out of big prizes for the winner. He referred to Chinese 8 ball and said its promotors are doing the same thing.

Filter

Back
Top