How do LOW-COST CARBON FIBER SHAFTS Perform Compared to the Best?
- By KingSamurai
- Main Forum
- 84 Replies
I think it is fair to subtract 0.3 from the slow-speed numbers and 0.4 from the fast-speed numbers in the first video based on the Revo numbers in both videos. The natural pivot length numbers don’t need adjustment based on the short distance and very fast sleed (so cloth is not a factor).
In light of comparing across videos, I decided to summarize the results. Based on the Revo changes between videos, I decided it to multiply results from first video by .77 to account for changes in cloth, etc and this gives same result for Revo in second video.That's why looking at same sizes between brands is a more useful comparison.
While I really enjoy any analysis/evaluation on deflection, and I respect Dr. Dave, not having a like-to-like test and, apparently, not being able to compare tests across videos, really does limit the practical uses of these comparison videos.
There is no criticism meant in that comment, any more than there is criticism meant against any shaft in this comparison video. Just observation.
Seeing other companies' cheapo shafts perform similarly to a $500+ Revo is quite interesting, of course.
I also added a field called "Variance" which is difference in deflection between Slow and Fast speeds, which would likely account for aiming adjustment needed.
It looks like Wheat State is the winner of the results. Whether it is worth the price is up to the buyer, but the results look good.
Dr. Dave, do you approve of these conclusions?