Hayden Ernst 14 Years of age...Straight shooter
- By JPB2
- Main Forum
- 73 Replies
I could well be wrong about his skill level, but I don't think his age alone should be a disqualifying factor. Another 14yo prodigy comes to mind - Yagiz Kaan Erdogmus, the Turkish chess Grandmaster. He just finished on a plus score - ahead of the current world champion Gukesh D - in one of the strongest annual invitational chess tournaments, Tata Steel (https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-tata-steel-chess).
Now, I know chess and pool aren't quite the same, but there are many similarities also (and, Yagiz is not the only example of a 15yo or younger player already thriving at or near the top level. Another is the 15yo American GM Andy Woodward, who won this year's B group (Challengers) at Tata Steel).
Yagiz's current FIDE chess rating, btw, would translate to something like 725-750 in Fargo terms. But he's competing successfully against players who are (in Fargo terms) 775-825+. Young players on an upward trajectory are often significantly underrated, so even if Hayden is not quite ready, I don't think we need to wait until he's 775+ as long as he keeps posting strong results and making progress.
I see what you are saying. Chess is different, although I am sure brain maturity and experience matter a lot from a 15 year old to a 21+ player. Exposing them to high level play is one thing. But the too much too soon approach can damage development. And people can easily overrate a young player. The classic example is the comparison between the development of Tiger Woods and Michelle Wie. I said back then I thought Wie was being mishandled. She had the POTENTIAL to be a great LPGA player. She had zero chance of playing the men’s game. Zero. But the hype and her parents etc… had people believing she could. I was happy to see her finally have a little success in the women’s game, but IMO her talent was not developed right.