iusedtoberich said:

Regarding their fargos, Anthony is a really good one hole player. If he has a lot of one hole matches in the system, it could have skewed his rating a bit higher.

There was another match for 60k where the lower rating won. Thomas Haas 726 vs Julio Burgos 737. They played 4 total sets, 2 9 ball, 2 10 ball, all race to 21. Thomas won 3 decisively, and Julio won one hill-hill. Both players have thousands of robustness.

Click to expand...

I just can't believe that people don't understand odds

Play enough sets and a 600 is gonna beat an 800, doesn't mean Fargo is wrong, in fact it will probably prove its right

july9x said:

I think they should rate men and women differently, at least when the rate is reaching 700.
From there, all female vs female matches should not have been credited as same as vs male matches.
I know they can figure something out, but except Siming Chen (I like to keep the debate going LOL), all other womens fargo is overrated by at least 25 - 50 points, PERIOD.

Click to expand...

Well Im glad you're here to set years of math and proof straight. How do the #'s know its a male or female Einstein? This should be good.

If nothing else you're a good troll, love it!

Bump..Open to Offer Beautiful Cue

Regarding their fargos, Anthony is a really good one hole player. If he has a lot of one hole matches in the system, it could have skewed his rating a bit higher.

There was another match for 60k where the lower rating won. Thomas Haas 726 vs Julio Burgos 737. They played 4 total sets, 2 9 ball, 2 10 ball, all race to 21. Thomas won 3 decisively, and Julio won one hill-hill. Both players have thousands of robustness.

garczar said:

He said he was not far from J. Zimmerman. That guy is very good at these jobs. Save a ton on not having to ship.

Click to expand...

That's who I would hire to do the work.

Can you tell them to start sponsoring players and events with all money they make LOL

9-7, possible comeback

yep, 9-8. but fedor to break

Kris_b1104 said:

Someone in the chat said Wolford bets all of his own money. Which I find hard to believe, unless his family is wealthy or something, or he owns a very successful business. They seemed to know him on a personal level and was very adamant. Betting 125K of your own money when you are not even a top 5-10 player in your own country is ridiculously stupid. He's ranked #19 in the USA. He is the 2nd best Shane though.

Click to expand...

is he the one who's dad owns a poolroom? sounds ridiculous either way to bet your own

jazznpool said:

Like new. Save.

Click to expand...

Do you have a picture of this thing assembled?

Texas Carom Club said:

who knew 20 fargo points counted for so much!
im headed to vegas, i cant lose now with this information

Click to expand...

just make sure those players has > 5000 of recent games in the database or robustness what Fargo called it.
9-ft and a long enough race so no luck get on the way, let the math helps you from there don't forget to send tips to the Fargo rate team.

jasonlaus said:

Who likes 30%? You're the one who thinks fargo rates men and women differently

Click to expand...

I think they should rate men and women differently, at least when the rate is reaching 700, until there is no Women pool association no more. There is a reason that women have their own division in events and there are pool federations & associations for pro women players. Unfortunately, pool is a physical demanding sport, like it or not, and a man is always favorite to win by nature.

From there (700 range), all female vs female matches should not have been credited as same as vs male matches.
I know they can figure something out, but except Siming Chen (I like to keep the debate going LOL), all other womens fargo is overrated by at least 25 - 50 points, PERIOD.

skogstokig said:

ought to be banned

Click to expand...

I clean my table once a week and thats not so bad. It’s the dark blue marks on the cue ball I have to clean off constantly that get annoying.

SBC said:

Players probably under 5 k each.

Meglino showed to be the stronger player in both sets. Does not make any bad decisions and executes at a very high level.

Click to expand...

I wouldn't be surprised if Anthony had more than that in it. I havent been around that crowd in about 14 years so I wouldn't even know who to ask...not that its any of my business

jasonlaus said:

Went up to 250

Click to expand...

Players probably under 5 k each.

Meglino showed to be the stronger player in both sets. Does not make any bad decisions and executes at a very high level.

july9x said:

This particular match, YES. If the odd is 7/3 you better take it, I know you are smart and you did your home work and still didn't have a clue who will win, so use the power of math LOL. They play max 3 sets race to 30, the numbers and math say you are most likely to win 2 sets, probably all 3. Don't be like someone that likes 30%

Click to expand...

Who likes 30%? You're the one who thinks fargo rates men and women differently

Bavafongoul said:

Until simeine comes out with a chalk superior to TAOM V10 or Pagulayan’s square version, why bother with any other brand of chalk? So far, nothing seems superior to V10. And it lasts a long time…..I am still using the same piece of V10 chalk for the last 14 months and it will likely last most of 2026. It is so cost effective and works better than other higher price chalks.

Click to expand...

How often are you chalking?

that would lead to believe the table wasnt breaking well for dennis.