More Early Impressions Of The Diamond Professional
- By u12armresl
- Main Forum
- 33 Replies
Agreed. Just checking as I think most ppl here can play more than a little.Pretty clearly says most here?
Agreed. Just checking as I think most ppl here can play more than a little.Pretty clearly says most here?
My visit to the refinery in Canada had us building scaffold to plus 75 feet. Tube and clamp. My first build with an experienced partner had him telling me, "you are incharge until I tell you you are not." I said, "Cool". We got er done .Even had some fun. And a great friend.
To set the records straight he shot 91 on the North Course but it changed when he played the South Course to 114.bav,
your son shot in the 90's at golf because he played torry pines and that is not a bad score there.
ill bet any 80's golfer if i was around he would shoot in the 90's there from the tips. if he was lucky.
If the refs do not know the cue ball physics exactly what do they think they are watching for? What do they believe that they will see with the naked eye that will have a bearing on the call either way??? The sanctioning body really needs to look at that and ask the same question before selecting refs. As far as I know everyvjob onb theI wasn't watching the match, so this is my first look at the final shot.
While I figured this was a foul based on cue ball direction, I don't think it was as obvious as the Capito foul vs Lechner in 2025. It's bizarre that referees don't understand the principles governing good and bad hits when two object balls are near each other. So often, cue ball direction and/or speed will make the call obvious, but referees need better training. In the end, the referee clearly lacked the needed understanding to call a foul, and given this, could not logically call a foul here. I view this as a "lack of knowledge" situation, not a "grossly mistaken call" situation. Based on the referee's knowledge, the right call was made. Still, referees who don't have the knowledge to judge these situations should not get the nod in the final of a world championship.
"Tannoy", I had to look that up, I had no idea what that was.Two things I disagree with, you said if you were FSR you would be challenging the call, but his view of the table was blocked by Yapp who was directly infront of him as he played the shot so realistically FSR didn't know what happened so was never going to say anything. Wonder what he thinks of it now.
And you think the ref should have taken longer, but someone announced over the tannoy that Yapp was champion almost as soon as the black went in, so that opportunity was taken out of her hands. I feel like the person on the tannoy is partially responsible for it not to have been properly reviewed, pretty hard to roll back a decision after you've publicly announced the champion.
I absolutely said that one. Yeah, the missing windows and the white what I'm assuming were bed sheets being used as curtains floating in the wind outside of the windows were all the clues I needed from I94 to know that I did noy want to be there. Plus its not like it didnt have a not so stellar reputation and everybody knew that landmark even all the way from the freeway.I reckon you said this...
pj
chgo